Literature DB >> 19345554

Concerns about end-of-life care and support for euthanasia.

Jane L Givens1, Susan L Mitchell.   

Abstract

Popular support for euthanasia is known to vary according to sociodemographic characteristics. However, little is known about whether support is associated with concerns regarding the emotional, physical, and economic burdens of end-of-life care. This study used data from the 1998 General Social Survey, a national survey of community-dwelling adults. The outcome variable assessed the respondents' support for a doctor's right to end life in the setting of terminal illness. Independent variables assessed the following concerns: 1) concern about the emotional burden of end-of-life decision making for family members; 2) worry about the economic burden of terminal illness; 3) concern about pain at the end of life; 4) worry that lack of money or insurance will result in second-class end-of-life care; and 5) belief that their religious community will be helpful at the end of life. Multivariable logistic regression estimated the independent effect of these concerns on support for euthanasia, adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics. Of 786 respondents, 70.6% approved of euthanasia in the setting of terminal illness. In adjusted analyses, respondents with concerns about the emotional toll of decision making on family members, economic burden, and poor health care because of lack of insurance were significantly more likely to support euthanasia. Respondents with faith in the helpfulness of their religious community were less likely to support euthanasia. In conclusion, emotional and economic concerns about end-of-life care were associated with support for the right to euthanasia. Future work can evaluate whether alleviating these concerns may reduce the perceived desire for euthanasia by patients near the end of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19345554      PMCID: PMC2782598          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  20 in total

1.  Euthanasia: moral paradoxes.

Authors:  H A ten Have
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.762

2.  Public attitudes toward euthanasia and suicide for terminally ill persons: 1977 and 1996.

Authors:  M A DeCesare
Journal:  Soc Biol       Date:  2000 Fall-Winter

3.  Should physicians aid their patients in dying? The public perspective.

Authors:  R J Blendon; U S Szalay; R A Knox
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-05-20       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Understanding economic and other burdens of terminal illness: the experience of patients and their caregivers.

Authors:  E J Emanuel; D L Fairclough; J Slutsman; L L Emanuel
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-03-21       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Life-sustaining treatment and assisted death choices in depressed older patients.

Authors:  K Blank; J Robison; E Doherty; H Prigerson; J Duffy; H I Schwartz
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Correlates of attitudes toward euthanasia.

Authors:  B K Singh
Journal:  Soc Biol       Date:  1979

7.  Doctor, I want to die. Will you help me?

Authors:  T E Quill
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Instability of attitudes about euthanasia and physician assisted suicide in depressed older hospitalized patients.

Authors:  K Blank; J Robison; H Prigerson; H I Schwartz
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.238

9.  Attitudes and desires related to euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide among terminally ill patients and their caregivers.

Authors:  E J Emanuel; D L Fairclough; L L Emanuel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Why Oregon patients request assisted death: family members' views.

Authors:  Linda Ganzini; Elizabeth R Goy; Steven K Dobscha
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  5 in total

1.  New frontiers in the future of palliative care: real-world bioethical dilemmas and axiology of clinical practice.

Authors:  Uría Guevara-López; Myriam M Altamirano-Bustamante; Carlos Viesca-Treviño
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 2.652

2.  Factors associated with preferences for long-term care settings in old age: evidence from a population-based survey in Germany.

Authors:  André Hajek; Thomas Lehnert; Annemarie Wegener; Steffi G Riedel-Heller; Hans-Helmut König
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Pain acceptance in cancer patients with chronic pain in Hunan, China: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Xianghua Xu; Qinqin Cheng; Meijun Ou; Shaping Li; Chanjuan Xie; Yongyi Chen
Journal:  Int J Nurs Sci       Date:  2019-09-23

4.  Associations of end-of-life preferences and trust in institutions with public support for assisted suicide: evidence from nationally representative survey data of older adults in Switzerland.

Authors:  Sarah Vilpert; Carmen Borrat-Besson; Gian Domenico Borasio; Jürgen Maurer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  'Burden to others' as a public concern in advanced cancer: a comparative survey in seven European countries.

Authors:  Claudia Bausewein; Natalia Calanzani; Barbara A Daveson; Steffen T Simon; Pedro L Ferreira; Irene J Higginson; Dorothee Bechinger-English; Luc Deliens; Marjolein Gysels; Franco Toscani; Lucas Ceulemans; Richard Harding; Barbara Gomes
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 4.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.