Literature DB >> 29043540

Between quality of life and hope. Attitudes and beliefs of Muslim women toward withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments.

Chaïma Ahaddour1, Stef Van den Branden2, Bert Broeckaert2.   

Abstract

The technological advances in medicine, including prolongation of life, have constituted several dilemmas at the end of life. In the context of the Belgian debates on end-of-life care, the views of Muslim women remain understudied. The aim of this article is fourfold. First, we seek to describe the beliefs and attitudes of middle-aged and elderly Moroccan Muslim women toward withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments. Second, we aim to identify whether differences are observable among middle-aged and elderly women's attitudes toward withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments. Third, we aim to explore the role of religion in their attitudes. Fourth, we seek to document how our results are related to normative Islamic literature. Qualitative empirical research was conducted with a sample of middle-aged and elderly Moroccan Muslim women (n = 30) living in Antwerp (Belgium) and with experts in the field (n = 15). We found an unconditional belief in God's sovereign power over the domain of life and death (cf. determined lifespan by God) and in God's almightiness (cf. belief in a miracle). However, we also found a tolerant attitude, mainly among our middle-aged participants, toward withholding and withdrawing (treatment) based on theological, eschatological, financial and quality of life arguments. Our study reveals that religious beliefs and worldviews have a great impact on the ethical attitudes toward end-of-life issues. We found divergent positions toward withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments, reflecting the lines of reasoning found in normative Islamic literature. In our interviews, theological and eschatological notions emerged as well as financial and quality of life arguments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  End of life; Grounded theory; Islam; Moroccan Muslim women; Non-treatment decision; Qualitative empirical research; Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatments

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29043540     DOI: 10.1007/s11019-017-9808-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Health Care Philos        ISSN: 1386-7423


  24 in total

Review 1.  Legal issues in end-of-life care: perspectives from Saudi Arabia and United States.

Authors:  Amani Babgi
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Ensuring cultural sensitivity for Muslim patients in the Australian ICU: considerations for care.

Authors:  Melissa J Bloomer; Abbas Al-Mutair
Journal:  Aust Crit Care       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 2.737

3.  Medical experts & Islamic scholars deliberating over brain death: gaps in the applied Islamic bioethics discourse.

Authors:  Aasim I Padela; Hasan Shanawani; Ahsan Arozullah
Journal:  Muslim World       Date:  2011

4.  Redefining the domains of decision making by physician and patient.

Authors:  J T Berger
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Brain death in Islamic ethico-legal deliberation: challenges for applied Islamic bioethics.

Authors:  Aasim I Padela; Ahsan Arozullah; Ebrahim Moosa
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 1.898

6.  Treatment decisions in advanced disease: a conceptual framework.

Authors:  Bert Broeckaert
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2009-01

7.  Islamic perspectives on clinical intervention near the end-of-life: We can but must we?

Authors:  Aasim I Padela; Omar Qureshi
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2017-12

8.  The practice of hope: a longitudinal, multi-perspective qualitative study among South Asian Sikhs and Muslims with life-limiting illness in Scotland.

Authors:  Maria Kristiansen; Tasneem Irshad; Allison Worth; Raj Bhopal; Julia Lawton; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 2.772

9.  Care of terminally-ill patients: an opinion survey among critical care healthcare providers in the Middle East.

Authors:  M ur Rahman; S Abuhasna; F M Abu-Zidan
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 0.927

10.  Reflections on palliative care from the jewish and islamic tradition.

Authors:  Michael Schultz; Kassim Baddarni; Gil Bar-Sela
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 2.629

View more
  5 in total

1.  Turkish imams and their role in decision-making in palliative care: A Directed Content and Narrative analysis.

Authors:  George Muishout; Nuray Topcu; Anne de la Croix; Gerard Wiegers; Hanneke Wm van Laarhoven
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 5.713

2.  Muslim physicians and palliative care: attitudes towards the use of palliative sedation.

Authors:  George Muishout; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Gerard Wiegers; Ulrike Popp-Baier
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Factors affecting the attitudes and opinions of ICU physicians regarding end-of-life decisions for their patients and themselves: A survey study from Turkey.

Authors:  Nur Baykara; Tuğhan Utku; Volkan Alparslan; Mustafa Kemal Arslantaş; Nermin Ersoy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  [Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions].

Authors:  Spyros D Mentzelopoulos; Keith Couper; Patrick Van de Voorde; Patrick Druwé; Marieke Blom; Gavin D Perkins; Ileana Lulic; Jana Djakow; Violetta Raffay; Gisela Lilja; Leo Bossaert
Journal:  Notf Rett Med       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 0.826

5.  Palliative care utilization in oncology and hemato-oncology: a systematic review of cognitive barriers and facilitators from the perspective of healthcare professionals, adult patients, and their families.

Authors:  Marco Bennardi; Nicola Diviani; Claudia Gamondi; Georg Stüssi; Piercarlo Saletti; Ivan Cinesi; Sara Rubinelli
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.234

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.