Literature DB >> 16532978

Gender and race/ethnicity affect the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening.

Charles P Theuer1, Thomas H Taylor, Wendy R Brewster, Hoda Anton-Culver.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Colorectal cancer screening beginning at age 50 is recommended for all Americans considered at average risk for the development of colorectal cancer regardless of gender or race/ethnicity. We determined the influence of gender and race/ethnicity on the cost-effectiveness of recommended colorectal cancer screening regimens.
METHODS: We determined age-specific colorectal cancer incidence rates; the proportion of left-sided cancers; and the proportion of localized cancers in Asian, black, Latino and white men and women using the California Cancer Registry. We incorporated these data and available data for life expectancy and colorectal cancer survival to model the cost-effectiveness of two 35-year colorectal cancer-screening interventions.
RESULTS: Age-specific colorectal cancer incidence rates were highest in black men and lowest in Latino women. Screening beginning at age 50 was most cost-effective in black men and least cost-effective in Latino women (measured as dollars spent per year of life saved) using annual fecal occult blood testing combined with flexible sigmoidoscopy every five years and using colonoscopy every 10 years. The cost-effectiveness of a 35-year screening program in black men beginning at age 45 was similar to the cost-effectiveness of screening white men and black women beginning at age 50 and more cost-effective than screening nonblack women as well as Asian and Latino men beginning at age 50.
CONCLUSIONS: Screening is most cost-effective in black men because of high age-specific colorectal cancer incidence rates. Initiation of colorectal cancer screening in this high-risk group prior to age 50 should be strongly considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16532978      PMCID: PMC2594807     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc        ISSN: 0027-9684            Impact factor:   1.798


  20 in total

1.  The California tumor registry: a state-of-the-art model for a regionalized, automated, population-based registry.

Authors:  J E Seiffert; W T Price; B Gordon
Journal:  Top Health Rec Manage       Date:  1990-12

2.  The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J S Mandel; T R Church; J H Bond; F Ederer; M S Geisser; S J Mongin; D C Snover; L M Schuman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-11-30       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Cost effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in the elderly.

Authors:  J L Wagner; R C Herdman; S Wadhwa
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-11-15       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Racial and ethnic colorectal cancer patterns affect the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in the United States.

Authors:  C P Theuer; J L Wagner; T H Taylor; W R Brewster; D Tran; C E McLaren; H Anton-Culver
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Subsite-specific incidence rate and stage of disease in colorectal cancer by race, gender, and age group in the United States, 1992-1997.

Authors:  X Cheng; V W Chen; B Steele; B Ruiz; J Fulton; L Liu; S E Carozza; R Greenlee
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer: update of early detection guidelines for prostate, colorectal, and endometrial cancers. Also: update 2001--testing for early lung cancer detection.

Authors:  R A Smith; A C von Eschenbach; R Wender; B Levin; T Byers; D Rothenberger; D Brooks; W Creasman; C Cohen; C Runowicz; D Saslow; V Cokkinides; H Eyre
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A Sonnenberg; F Delcò; J M Inadomi
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-10-17       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 8.  Cancer statistics, 2004.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Ram C Tiwari; Taylor Murray; Asma Ghafoor; Alicia Samuels; Elizabeth Ward; Eric J Feuer; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Screening sigmoidoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality.

Authors:  P A Newcomb; R G Norfleet; B E Storer; T S Surawicz; P M Marcus
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1992-10-21       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J V Selby; G D Friedman; C P Quesenberry; N S Weiss
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-03-05       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of screening strategies for pre-malignant lesions using a biomathematical approach.

Authors:  Jihyoun Jeon; Rafael Meza; Suresh H Moolgavkar; E Georg Luebeck
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 2.144

Review 2.  Characterization of the Hispanic or latino population in health research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Abraham Aragones; Susan L Hayes; Mei Hsuan Chen; Javier González; Francesca M Gany
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2014-06

3.  Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening - an overview.

Authors:  Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Amy B Knudsen; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.043

Review 4.  Risk-stratified strategies in population screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Reinier Meester; Lucie de Jonge; Andrea Buron; Ulrike Haug; Carlo Senore
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 7.316

5.  Outcomes of men who present with elevated serum PSA (>20 ng/mL) to an inner-city hospital.

Authors:  Satoshi Anai; C Shawn West; Myron Chang; Kogenta Nakamura; John Pendleton; Charles J Rosser
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 6.  Disparities in colorectal cancer in African-Americans vs Whites: before and after diagnosis.

Authors:  Anastasios Dimou; Kostas N Syrigos; Muhammad Wasif Saif
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Individualizing colonoscopy screening by sex and race.

Authors:  Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Ann G Zauber; Rob Boer; Janneke Wilschut; Sidney J Winawer; J Dik F Habbema
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-05-24       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Ancestry in translational genomic medicine: handle with care.

Authors:  David Gurwitz; Jeantine E Lunshof
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 11.117

9.  Review of economic evidence in the prevention and early detection of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kim E Jeong; John A Cairns
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2013-09-12

10.  Why equal treatment is not always equitable: the impact of existing ethnic health inequalities in cost-effectiveness modeling.

Authors:  Melissa McLeod; Tony Blakely; Giorgi Kvizhinadze; Ricci Harris
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2014-06-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.