Literature DB >> 11231939

Racial and ethnic colorectal cancer patterns affect the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in the United States.

C P Theuer1, J L Wagner, T H Taylor, W R Brewster, D Tran, C E McLaren, H Anton-Culver.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Colorectal cancer screening beginning at age 50 is recommended for all Americans considered at "average" risk for the development of colorectal cancer.
METHODS: We used 1988-1995 California Cancer Registry data to compare the cost-effectiveness of two 35-year colorectal cancer screening interventions among Asians, blacks, Latinos, and Whites.
RESULTS: Average annual age-specific colorectal cancer incidence rates were highest in blacks and lowest in Latinos. Screening beginning at age 50 was most cost-effective in blacks and least cost-effective in Latinos (measured as dollars spent per year of life saved), using annual fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) combined with flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 years and using colonoscopy every 10 years. A 35-year screening program beginning in blacks at age 42, whites at age 44, or Asians at age 46 was more cost-effective than screening Latinos beginning at age 50.
CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal cancer screening programs beginning at age 50, using either FOBT and flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy in each racial or ethnic group, are within the $40,000-$60,000 per year of life saved upper cost limit considered acceptable for preventive strategies. Screening is most cost-effective in blacks because of high age-specific colorectal cancer incidence rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11231939     DOI: 10.1053/gast.2001.22535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  29 in total

Review 1.  Access to health care for ethnic minority populations.

Authors:  A Szczepura
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Should African Americans be screened for colorectal cancer at an earlier age?

Authors:  John M Carethers
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2005-08

3.  Telephone outreach to increase colorectal cancer screening in an urban minority population.

Authors:  Charles E Basch; Randi L Wolf; Corey H Brouse; Celia Shmukler; Alfred Neugut; Lawrence T DeCarlo; Steven Shea
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Factors that increase risk of colon polyps.

Authors:  Sarah W Grahn; Madhulika G Varma
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-11

5.  Characteristics of colorectal cancer in the human immunodeficiency virus-infected African American population.

Authors:  Avishek Kumar; Nihar Shah; Yashpal Modi; Hamid S Shaaban; Joseph DePasquale; Vincent A DeBari; Swaroopa Yerrabothala; Michael Maroules; Gunwant K Guron
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Age at cancer diagnosis for blacks compared with whites in the United States.

Authors:  Hilary A Robbins; Eric A Engels; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Meredith S Shiels
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  Characterization of the Hispanic or latino population in health research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Abraham Aragones; Susan L Hayes; Mei Hsuan Chen; Javier González; Francesca M Gany
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2014-06

8.  Prevalence of colon polyps detected by colonoscopy screening in asymptomatic black and white patients.

Authors:  David A Lieberman; Jennifer L Holub; Matthew D Moravec; Glenn M Eisen; Dawn Peters; Cynthia D Morris
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Decision making about cancer screening: an assessment of the state of the science and a suggested research agenda from the ASPO Behavioral Oncology and Cancer Communication Special Interest Group.

Authors:  Marc T Kiviniemi; Jennifer L Hay; Aimee S James; Isaac M Lipkus; Helen I Meissner; Michael Stefanek; Jamie L Studts; John F P Bridges; David R Close; Deborah O Erwin; Resa M Jones; Karen Kaiser; Kathryn M Kash; Kimberly M Kelly; Simon J Craddock Lee; Jason Q Purnell; Laura A Siminoff; Susan T Vadaparampil; Catharine Wang
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Gender and race/ethnicity affect the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Charles P Theuer; Thomas H Taylor; Wendy R Brewster; Hoda Anton-Culver
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.798

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.