Literature DB >> 20833348

Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening - an overview.

Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar1, Amy B Knudsen, Hermann Brenner.   

Abstract

There are several modalities available for a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program. When determining which CRC screening program to implement, the costs of such programs should be considered in comparison to the health benefits they are expected to provide. Cost-effectiveness analysis provides a tool to do this. In this paper we review the evidence on the cost-effectiveness of CRC screening. Published studies universally indicate that when compared with no CRC screening, all screening modalities provide additional years of life at a cost that is deemed acceptable by most industrialized nations. Many recent studies even find CRC screening to be cost-saving. However, when the alternative CRC screening strategies are compared against each other in an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis, no single optimal strategy emerges across the studies. There is consensus that the new technologies of stool DNA testing, computed tomographic colonography and capsule endoscopy are not yet cost-effective compared with the established CRC screening tests.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20833348      PMCID: PMC2939039          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1521-6918            Impact factor:   3.043


  85 in total

1.  Colonoscopy services in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  B Macfarlane; R Leicester; C Romaya; O Epstein
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Comparative evaluation of a new bedside faecal occult blood test in a prospective multicentre study.

Authors:  N Hoepffner; Y M Shastri; E Hanisch; W Rösch; J Mössner; W F Caspary; J Stein
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 8.171

3.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of fecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Catherine Lejeune; Patrick Arveux; Vincent Dancourt; Sophie Béjean; Claire Bonithon-Kopp; Jean Faivre
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.188

4.  The Personalized Medicine Coalition: goals and strategies.

Authors:  Edward Abrahams; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Mike Silver
Journal:  Am J Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2005

5.  Pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics: origin, status, and the hope for personalized medicine.

Authors:  W Kalow
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.550

6.  Colorectal cancer screening in Australia: an economic evaluation of a potential biennial screening program using faecal occult blood tests.

Authors:  Christine A Stone; Robert C Carter; Theo Vos; James St John
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.939

7.  Guaiac versus immunochemical tests: faecal occult blood test screening for colorectal cancer in a rural community.

Authors:  Karen Hughes; Barbara Leggett; Christopher Del Mar; John Croese; Stephen Fairley; John Masson; Joanne Aitken; Alexandra Clavarino; Monika Janda; Warren R Stanton; Shilu Tong; Beth Newman
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.939

8.  Randomized trial of different screening strategies for colorectal cancer: patient response and detection rates.

Authors:  Nereo Segnan; Carlo Senore; Bruno Andreoni; Arrigo Arrigoni; Luigi Bisanti; Alessandro Cardelli; Guido Castiglione; Cristiano Crosta; Roberta DiPlacido; Arnaldo Ferrari; Roberto Ferraris; Franco Ferrero; Mario Fracchia; Stefano Gasperoni; Giuseppe Malfitana; Serafino Recchia; Mauro Risio; Mario Rizzetto; Giorgio Saracco; Mauro Spandre; Delio Turco; Patricia Turco; Marco Zappa
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Colorectal cancer in African Americans.

Authors:  Sangeeta Agrawal; Anand Bhupinderjit; Manoop S Bhutani; Lisa Boardman; Cuong Nguyen; Yvonne Romero; Radhika Srinivasan; Radhika Srinvasan; Colmar Figueroa-Moseley
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Gender and race/ethnicity affect the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Charles P Theuer; Thomas H Taylor; Wendy R Brewster; Hoda Anton-Culver
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.798

View more
  14 in total

1.  Awareness of Stomach and Colorectal Cancer Risk Factors, Symptoms and Time Taken to Seek Medical Help Among Public Attending Primary Care Setting in Muscat Governorate, Oman.

Authors:  Mohammed Al-Azri; Jamila Al-Kindi; Thuraiya Al-Harthi; Manal Al-Dahri; Sathiya Murthi Panchatcharam; Abdullah Al-Maniri
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Colorectal cancer surveillance in Portuguese families with lynch syndrome: a cohort study.

Authors:  Rita Vale Rodrigues; Isabel Claro; Pedro Lage; Isadora Rosa; Sara Ferreira; João Pereira da Silva; António Dias Pereira
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Choosing the optimal method in programmatic colorectal cancer screening: current evidence and controversies.

Authors:  Antoni Castells
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.409

4.  Surveillance Intensity Comparison by Risk for T1NX Locally Excised Rectal Adenocarcinoma: a Cost-Effective Analysis.

Authors:  Mason McCain; Yohanis O'Neill; Hernan Hernandez; Ryan Foley; Brian M Sadowski; Zachary Torgersen; Jennifer Beaty; Ruben Rojas Payacan; Charles A Ternent
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  Virtual gastrointestinal colonoscopy in combination with large bowel endoscopy: clinical application.

Authors:  Qing He; Ting Rao; Yong-Song Guan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Reevaluating the Evidence for Intensive Postoperative Extracolonic Surveillance for Nonmetastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Jonah Popp; David S Weinberg; Eva Enns; John A Nyman; J Robert Beck; Karen M Kuntz
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 5.101

7.  Cost-effectiveness of population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a comparison of guaiac-based faecal occult blood testing, faecal immunochemical testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  L Sharp; L Tilson; S Whyte; A O'Ceilleachair; C Walsh; C Usher; P Tappenden; J Chilcott; A Staines; M Barry; H Comber
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Automated telephone calls to enhance colorectal cancer screening: economic analysis.

Authors:  David H Smith; Adrienne C Feldstein; Nancy Perrin; A Gabriela Rosales; David M Mosen; Elizabeth G Liles; Jennifer L Schneider; Jennifer E Lafata; Ronald E Meyers; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.229

9.  Using resource modelling to inform decision making and service planning: the case of colorectal cancer screening in Ireland.

Authors:  Linda Sharp; Lesley Tilson; Sophie Whyte; Alan O Ceilleachair; Cathal Walsh; Cara Usher; Paul Tappenden; James Chilcott; Anthony Staines; Michael Barry; Harry Comber
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 10.  Flexible sigmoidoscopy versus faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals.

Authors:  Øyvind Holme; Michael Bretthauer; Atle Fretheim; Jan Odgaard-Jensen; Geir Hoff
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.