Literature DB >> 1404450

Screening sigmoidoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality.

P A Newcomb1, R G Norfleet, B E Storer, T S Surawicz, P M Marcus.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sigmoidoscopy may reduce colorectal cancer mortality by identifying both cancers and precursor lesions (including polyps) for treatment; however, evidence regarding the efficacy of this technique as a screening procedure is extremely limited.
PURPOSE: In the absence of data from randomized controlled trials, we performed a retrospective case-control study to determine if sigmoidoscopy screening is associated with a reduction in colorectal cancer mortality.
METHODS: The medical records of 66 members of the Greater Marshfield Community Health Plan (GMCHP) who died of large-bowel cancer from 1979 to 1988 were reviewed for history of screening for colorectal cancer (case subjects). For comparison, the records of 196 GMCHP members of similar gender, age, and enrollment duration were randomly selected for review (control subjects).
RESULTS: History of screening sigmoidoscopy was much less common among case subjects (10%) than among control subjects (30%). Risk for death from colorectal cancer was reduced among individuals having had a single examination by screening sigmoidoscopy (odds ratio = 0.21; 95% confidence interval = 0.08-0.52), compared with the risk for those who never had one. The reduction in risk appeared to be limited to tumors in the rectum and distal colon. Neither fecal occult blood testing nor digital rectal examination was associated with a reduction in colorectal cancer mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that screening sigmoidoscopy can substantially reduce mortality from cancers of the rectum and distal colon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1404450     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/84.20.1572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  150 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers as surrogates for cancer development.

Authors:  E Hawk; J L Viner; J A Lawrence
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Colorectal cancer screening in the UK: Joint Position Statement by the British Society of Gastroenterology, The Royal College of Physicians, and The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Authors:  J M Rhodes
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Computed tomography colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a new method for colorectal screening.

Authors:  C D Johnson; D A Ahlquist
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Colorectal cancer screening. Recommendation statement from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-07-24       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  [Staging of colorectal cancer. Official recommendations of the Canadian Study Group on Preventive Medicine].

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Colorectal cancer screening. Recommendation statement from the Canadian task force on preventive health care.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Primary care physicians' decisions to perform flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  J D Lewis; D A Asch; G G Ginsberg; T C Hoops; M L Kochman; W B Bilker; B L Strom
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Management of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A Melville; T A Sheldon; R Gray; A Sowden
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-06

9.  Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence.

Authors:  F Citarda; G Tomaselli; R Capocaccia; S Barcherini; M Crespi
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 10.  Screening for cancer: valuable or not?

Authors:  Frank L Meyskens
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.