Literature DB >> 16528644

CathCam guide wire-directed colonoscopy: first pilot study in patients with a previous incomplete colonoscopy.

A Fritscher-Ravens1, S Fox, C P Swain, P Milla, G Long.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Conventional colonoscopy as the gold standard for large-bowel diagnostics and therapy may fail in 5 %-20 % of cases, depending on the experience of the examiner. Colonoscopy is regarded as difficult and painful by many patients. In an attempt to overcome the limitations of conventional colonoscopes, a guide wire-directed, thin, flexible diagnostic colonoscope, the CathCam was developed. In this prospective pilot study, we report its use in patients in whom conventional colonoscopy had failed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 49 patients with a previous or current failure of complete colonoscopy were invited to participate in a trial using the new CathCam system, and 14 (nine men; mean age 59 years) accepted. The CathCam is an 11-mm diameter disposable, multilumen catheter, with visualization by a 3-mm camera with six light-emitting diodes. In the first five patients, the CathCam was inserted over a newly developed 0.024-inch, hinged, lumen-seeking guide wire. Subsequently, a modified combined approach was used: a conventional colonoscope was introduced into the sigmoid or left colon, then the guide wire was advanced as far as possible, followed by CathCam insertion over it. Caecal intubation rate, insertion times and patient discomfort were recorded; patients received low-dose midazolam sedation (2-5 mg).
RESULTS: One patient was excluded during colonoscopy. The caecum could be eventually reached in 12 of 13 patients; in the remaining patient a significant sigmoid stricture could be passed, but further advancement appeared too risky. The mean caecal intubation time was 24 minutes (range 3-105 min). Only two patients experienced pain and discomfort during the procedure (one immediate assessment and one case reported at later telephone interview). No complications occurred, and previously undiagnosed important findings were obtained in 9 cases.
CONCLUSIONS: A combined approach, consisting of guide wire insertion via a partially introduced colonoscope followed by CathCam or colonoscope insertion into the caecum was successful in over 90 % of patients with previous failure of complete colonoscopy. Further improvements may make this system suitable for use as a standard diagnostic colonoscope, either as a single unit (CathCam plus guide wire) or using the guide wire alone with a standard colonoscope in difficult cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16528644     DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-925138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  8 in total

1.  Magnetic air capsule robotic system: proof of concept of a novel approach for painless colonoscopy.

Authors:  P Valdastri; G Ciuti; A Verbeni; A Menciassi; P Dario; A Arezzo; M Morino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  New endoscopy devices to improve population adherence to colorectal cancer prevention programs.

Authors:  Asimina Gaglia; Ioannis S Papanikolaou; Wilfried Veltzke-Schlieker
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-07-16

Review 3.  Mechanical analysis of insertion problems and pain during colonoscopy: why highly skill-dependent colonoscopy routines are necessary in the first place... and how they may be avoided.

Authors:  Arjo J Loeve; Paul Fockens; Paul Breedveld
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 4.  An innovative robotic platform for magnetically-driven painless colonoscopy.

Authors:  Federico Bianchi; Gastone Ciuti; Anastasios Koulaouzidis; Alberto Arezzo; Danail Stoyanov; Sebastian Schostek; Calogero Maria Oddo; Arianna Menciassi; Paolo Dario
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-11

5.  Perspectives of colorectal cancer screening in Germany 2009.

Authors:  Andreas Sieg; Kilian Friedrich
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-10-15

Review 6.  Advanced endoscopic technologies for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Keith L Obstein; Pietro Valdastri
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Clinical usefulness of single-balloon endoscopy in patients with previously incomplete colonoscopy.

Authors:  Kiyonori Kobayashi; Miyuki Mukae; Taishi Ogawa; Kaoru Yokoyama; Miwa Sada; Wasaburo Koizumi
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-03-16

Review 8.  The endoscopy evolution: 'the superscope era'.

Authors:  Nisha Patel; Ara Darzi; Julian Teare
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.