Literature DB >> 21160614

New endoscopy devices to improve population adherence to colorectal cancer prevention programs.

Asimina Gaglia1, Ioannis S Papanikolaou, Wilfried Veltzke-Schlieker.   

Abstract

Despite recent advances in medicine, colorectal cancer (CRC) remains one of the greatest hazards for public health worldwide and especially the industrialized world. It has been well documented with concrete data that regular screening colonoscopy aimed at early detection of precancerous polyps can help decrease the incidence of CRC. However, the adherence of the general population to such screening programs has been shown to be lower than that expected, thus allowing CRC to remain a major threat for public health. Various reasons have been suggested to explain the disappointing compliance of the population to CRC screening programs, some of them associated with colonoscopy per se, which is viewed by many people as an unpleasant examination. Governments, medical societies, individual gastroenterologists, as well as the medical industry are working in order to improve endoscopic devices and/or to improve standard colonoscopy. The aim is to improve the acceptance of the population for this method of CRC screening, by providing a painless and reliable examination of the colon. This review focuses on some of the latest improvements in this field.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer screening; New colonoscopes; Technology

Year:  2010        PMID: 21160614      PMCID: PMC2999142          DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v2.i7.244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc


  34 in total

1.  Descriptive epidemiology of colorectal cancer in the United States, 1998-2001.

Authors:  Jeannette Jackson-Thompson; Faruque Ahmed; Robert R German; Sue-Min Lai; Carol Friedman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Variable stiffness colonoscope versus regular adult colonoscope: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  M O Othman; A G Bradley; A Choudhary; R M Hoffman; P K Roy
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  Effect of variable stiffness colonoscopes on cecal intubation times for routine colonoscopy by an experienced examiner in sedated patients.

Authors:  D K Rex
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  Screening behavior of individuals at high risk for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Eveline M A Bleiker; Fred H Menko; Babs G Taal; Irma Kluijt; Lidwina D V Wever; Miranda A Gerritsma; Hans F A Vasen; Neil K Aaronson
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Computer-assisted colonoscopy (the NeoGuide Endoscopy System): results of the first human clinical trial ("PACE study").

Authors:  Axel Eickhoff; Jacques van Dam; Ralf Jakobs; Valerie Kudis; Dirk Hartmann; Ulrich Damian; Uwe Weickert; Dieter Schilling; Jürgen F Riemann
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Meredith A Goldwasser; Lawrence F Paszat; Refik Saskin; David R Urbach; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Adherence to screening examinations for colorectal cancer after diagnosis in a first-degree relative.

Authors:  J L Richardson; K Danley; G T Mondrus; D Deapen; T Mack
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Prospective multicenter performance evaluation of the second-generation colon capsule compared with colonoscopy.

Authors:  R Eliakim; K Yassin; Y Niv; Y Metzger; J Lachter; E Gal; B Sapoznikov; F Konikoff; G Leichtmann; Z Fireman; Y Kopelman; S N Adler
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect?

Authors:  A Adler; H Pohl; I S Papanikolaou; H Abou-Rebyeh; G Schachschal; W Veltzke-Schlieker; A C Khalifa; E Setka; M Koch; B Wiedenmann; T Rösch
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Protection by endoscopy against death from colorectal cancer. A case-control study among veterans.

Authors:  A D Müller; A Sonnenberg
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1995-09-11
View more
  4 in total

1.  Awareness and attitudes of Greek medical students on colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Ioannis S Papanikolaou; Athanasios D Sioulas; Stylianos Kalimeris; Persephone Papatheodosiou; Ioannis Karabinis; Olga Agelopoulou; Iosif Beintaris; Dimitrios Polymeros; George Dimitriadis; Konstantinos Triantafyllou
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-11-16

2.  Academic hospital staff compliance with a fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening program.

Authors:  Georgia Vlachonikolou; Paraskevas Gkolfakis; Athanasios D Sioulas; Ioannis S Papanikolaou; Anastasia Melissaratou; Giannis-Aimant Moustafa; Eleni Xanthopoulou; Gerasimos Tsilimidos; Ioanna Tsironi; Paraskevas Filippidis; Chrysoula Malli; George D Dimitriadis; Konstantinos Triantafyllou
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-08-15

3.  Validation of a Patient Satisfaction Scale in Patients Undergoing Bowel Preparation Prior to Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Hind T Hatoum; Swu-Jane Lin; Raymond E Joseph; David N Dahdal
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 4.  Emerging next-generation robotic colonoscopy systems towards painless colonoscopy.

Authors:  Chung-Kwong Yeung; Jo Lk Cheung; Biji Sreedhar
Journal:  J Dig Dis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.325

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.