Literature DB >> 23515370

Clinical usefulness of single-balloon endoscopy in patients with previously incomplete colonoscopy.

Kiyonori Kobayashi1, Miyuki Mukae, Taishi Ogawa, Kaoru Yokoyama, Miwa Sada, Wasaburo Koizumi.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the clinical usefulness of single-balloon endoscopy (SBE) in patients in whom a colonoscope was technically difficult to insert previously.
METHODS: The study group comprised 15 patients (8 men and 7 women) who underwent SBE for colonoscopy (30 sessions). The number of SBE sessions was 1 in 7 patients, 2 in 5 patients, 3 in 1 patient, 4 in 1 patient, and 6 in 1 patient. In all patients, total colonoscopy was previously unsuccessful. The reasons for difficulty in scope passage were an elongated colon in 6 patients, severe intestinal adhesions after open surgery in 4, an elongated colon and severe intestinal adhesions in 2, a left inguinal hernia in 2, and multiple diverticulosis of the sigmoid colon in 1. Three endoscopists were responsible for SBE. The technique for inserting SBE in the colon was basically similar to that in the small intestine. The effectiveness of SBE was assessed on the basis of the success rate of total colonoscopy and the presence or absence of complications. We also evaluated the diagnostic and treatment outcomes of colonoscopic examinations with SBE.
RESULTS: Total colonoscopy was successfully accomplished in all sessions. The mean insertion time to the cecum was 22.9 ± 8.9 min (range 9 to 40). Abnormalities were found during 21 sessions of SBE. The most common abnormality was colorectal polyps (20 sessions), followed by radiation colitis (3 sessions) and diverticular disease of the colon (3 sessions). Colorectal polyps were resected endoscopically in 15 sessions. A total of 42 polyps were resected endoscopically, using snare polypectomy in 32 lesions, hot biopsy in 7 lesions, and endoscopic mucosal resection in 3 lesions. Fifty-six colorectal polyps were newly diagnosed on colonoscopic examination with SBE. Histopathologically, these lesions included 2 intramucosal cancers, 42 tubular adenomas, and 2 tubulovillous adenomas. The mean examination time was 48.2 ± 20.0 min (range 25 to 90). Colonoscopic examination or endoscopic treatment with SBE was not associated with any serious complications.
CONCLUSION: SBE is a useful and safe procedure in patients in whom a colonoscope is technically difficult to insert.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colonoscopy; Diagnosis; Difficult to insert; Endoscopic treatment; Single-balloon endoscopy

Year:  2013        PMID: 23515370      PMCID: PMC3600547          DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i3.117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc


  21 in total

1.  New system of double-balloon enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of small intestinal disorders.

Authors:  Hinonori Yamamoto; Tomonori Yano; Hiroto Kita; Keijiro Sunada; Kenichi Ido; Kentaro Sugano
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Usefulness of a small-caliber, variable-stiffness colonoscope as a backup in patients with difficult or incomplete colonoscopy.

Authors:  Akira Horiuchi; Yoshiko Nakayama; Masashi Kajiyama; Hideyasu Fujii; Naoki Tanaka
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Push-and-pull enteroscopy using a single-balloon technique for difficult colonoscopy.

Authors:  A May; L Nachbar; C Ell
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  Usefulness of the double-balloon enteroscope in colonoscopies performed in patients with previously failed colonoscopy.

Authors:  Klaus Mönkemüller; Claudia Knippig; Steffen Rickes; Lucia C Fry; Annekathrin Schulze; Peter Malfertheiner
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.423

5.  Use of a push enteroscope improves ability to perform total colonoscopy in previously unsuccessful attempts at colonoscopy in adult patients.

Authors:  G R Lichtenstein; P D Park; W B Long; G G Ginsberg; M L Kochman
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  A new variable stiffness colonoscope makes colonoscopy easier: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  J C Brooker; B P Saunders; S G Shah; C B Williams
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Use of a double balloon enteroscope facilitates caecal intubation after incomplete colonoscopy with a standard colonoscope.

Authors:  T Kaltenbach; R Soetikno; S Friedland
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 4.088

8.  Spiral overtube-assisted colonoscopy after incomplete colonoscopy in the redundant colon.

Authors:  Drew B Schembre; Andrew S Ross; Michael N Gluck; John J Brandabur; Susan E McCormick; Otto S Lin
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Quality assessment of colonoscopic cecal intubation: an analysis of 6 years of continuous practice at a university hospital.

Authors:  Florence Aslinia; Lance Uradomo; Allison Steele; Bruce D Greenwald; Jean-Pierre Raufman
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  CathCam guide wire-directed colonoscopy: first pilot study in patients with a previous incomplete colonoscopy.

Authors:  A Fritscher-Ravens; S Fox; C P Swain; P Milla; G Long
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 10.093

View more
  4 in total

1.  Advances in balloon endoscopes.

Authors:  Akihiro Araki; Kiichiro Tsuchiya; Mamoru Watanabe
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-23

Review 2.  Current status of single-balloon enteroscopy: Insertability and clinical applications.

Authors:  Takuji Kawamura; Koji Uno; Kiyohito Tanaka; Kenjiro Yasuda
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-01-16

3.  Balloon-Assisted Colonoscopy after Incomplete Conventional Colonoscopy-Experience from Two European Centres with A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Alexander R Robertson; Anastasios Koulaouzidis; Diana E Yung; Christopher Fraser; Artur Nemeth; Kenneth Trimble; Ervin Toth; John N Plevris; Gabriele Wurm Johansson
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  High Efficacy of Repeating Colonoscopy by an Advanced Endoscopist after an Incomplete Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Ana Ponte; Rolando Pinho; Adélia Rodrigues; Luísa Proença; Joana Silva; Jaime P Rodrigues; Mafalda Sousa; João Carlos Silva; João Carvalho
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-02-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.