Literature DB >> 16525898

Attitudes to genetic testing for deafness: the importance of informed choice.

Marilys Guillemin1, Lynn Gillam.   

Abstract

With recent progress in the identification of genes for deafness, it is highly likely that genetic testing, including pre-natal testing, for deafness will become more widely available. In a context where there are concerns about pre-natal testing, and where many in the Deaf community contest the understanding of deafness as a disability, it is important to examine the attitudes of Deaf/deaf people toward genetic testing. This qualitative study employed in-depth interviews to investigate the views about genetic testing for deafness of 19 participants, who were identified as functionally deaf or hearing impaired, or as belonging to the Deaf community. The key findings are that participants were generally supportive of genetic testing for deafness but only when full information about all relevant aspects of deafness is given to prospective users of genetics services. Participants emphasized informed choice, stating that information about medical and technological options for deaf people should be provided, together with information about communication, education, and the experience of being deaf. Although there was less support for pre-natal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy for deafness, most participants nonetheless felt that individual choice was important and that pre-natal diagnosis should be made available to those who wanted to use it.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16525898     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-005-9003-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.717


  16 in total

1.  Genetics and deafness: what do families want?

Authors:  M J Parker; H M Fortnum; I D Young; A C Davis
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Connexin 26 mutations in hereditary non-syndromic sensorineural deafness.

Authors:  D P Kelsell; J Dunlop; H P Stevens; N J Lench; J N Liang; G Parry; R F Mueller; I M Leigh
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-05-01       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Attitudes of deaf and hard of hearing subjects towards genetic testing and prenatal diagnosis of hearing loss.

Authors:  S J Stern; K S Arnos; L Murrelle; K Oelrich Welch; W E Nance; A Pandya
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 4.  Clinical application of genetic testing for deafness.

Authors:  Richard J H Smith
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 2.802

5.  Disability rights, prenatal diagnosis and eugenics: a cross-cultural view.

Authors:  Aviad E Raz
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Mother father deaf: the heritage of difference.

Authors:  P Preston
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Prenatal diagnosis for inherited deafness--what is the potential demand?

Authors:  A Middleton; J Hewison; R Mueller
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Prenatal screening and discriminatory attitudes about disability.

Authors:  M Saxton
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  1987

9.  First-trimester prenatal screening for the common 35delG GJB2 mutation causing prelingual deafness.

Authors:  Domenico A Coviello; Bruno Brambati; Lucia Tului; Antonio Percesepe; Francesca Sironi; Achal Sahai; Roberto Bertorelli; Antonino Forabosco
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.050

10.  Attitudes of deaf adults toward genetic testing for hereditary deafness.

Authors:  A Middleton; J Hewison; R F Mueller
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  9 in total

1.  Access to genetic testing and genetic counseling in vulnerable populations: the d/Deaf and hard of hearing population.

Authors:  Sandra Cooke-Hubley; Victor Maddalena
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-05-01

2.  Providing a transcultural genetic counseling service in the UK.

Authors:  Anna Middleton; Fiona Robson; Liza Burnell; Mushtaq Ahmed
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Deaf adults' reasons for genetic testing depend on cultural affiliation: results from a prospective, longitudinal genetic counseling and testing study.

Authors:  Patrick Boudreault; Erin E Baldwin; Michelle Fox; Loriel Dutton; Leeelle Tullis; Joyce Linden; Yoko Kobayashi; Jin Zhou; Janet S Sinsheimer; Yvonne Sininger; Wayne W Grody; Christina G S Palmer
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2010-05-20

Review 4.  Ethical and social implications of genetic testing for communication disorders.

Authors:  Kathleen S Arnos
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 2.288

5.  A prospective, longitudinal study of the impact of GJB2/GJB6 genetic testing on the beliefs and attitudes of parents of deaf and hard-of-hearing infants.

Authors:  Christina G S Palmer; Ariadna Martinez; Michelle Fox; Jin Zhou; Nina Shapiro; Yvonne Sininger; Wayne W Grody; Lisa A Schimmenti
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.802

6.  "My Plate is Full": Reasons for Declining a Genetic Evaluation of Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Marci M Lesperance; Erin Winkler; Tori L Melendez; Beverly M Yashar
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Consumer motivations for pursuing genetic testing and their preferences for the provision of genetic services for hearing loss.

Authors:  Kara A Withrow; Sarah Burton; Kathleen S Arnos; Andrea Kalfoglou; Arti Pandya
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-02-05       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Imagined futures: how experiential knowledge of disability affects parents' decision making about fetal abnormality.

Authors:  Emma F France; Louise Locock; Kate Hunt; Sue Ziebland; Kate Field; Sally Wyke
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-05-30       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Examining the relationship between genetic counselors' attitudes toward deaf people and the genetic counseling session.

Authors:  Emily E Enns; Patrick Boudreault; Christina G S Palmer
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 2.537

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.