Literature DB >> 19449415

A prospective, longitudinal study of the impact of GJB2/GJB6 genetic testing on the beliefs and attitudes of parents of deaf and hard-of-hearing infants.

Christina G S Palmer1, Ariadna Martinez, Michelle Fox, Jin Zhou, Nina Shapiro, Yvonne Sininger, Wayne W Grody, Lisa A Schimmenti.   

Abstract

There are limited data on the impact of incorporating genetic counseling and testing into the newborn hearing screening process. We report on results from a prospective, longitudinal study to determine the impact of genetic counseling and GJB2/GJB6 genetic testing on parental knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about genetic testing. One hundred thirty culturally hearing parents of 93 deaf or hard-of-hearing children ages 0-3 years primarily identified through newborn hearing screening received pre- and post-test genetic counseling for GJB2 and GJB6. Parents completed questionnaires following pre-test counseling, and 1- and 6-month post-test result disclosure. Results indicate that following pre-test counseling all parents perceived benefits to genetic testing. While parents who received positive results continued to perceive benefits from testing, perceived benefit declined among parents who received inconclusive or negative results. Parents did not perceive genetic testing as harmful following pre-test counseling or receipt of test results. Parents who received positive test results performed better in understanding recurrence and causation of their child's deafness and indicated greater interest in prenatal genetic testing than those who received inconclusive or negative test results. Parents felt that pediatricians and audiologists should inform parents of genetic testing availability; however, there was no consensus on timing of this discussion. Thus culturally hearing parents do not perceive genetic testing of their deaf or hard-of-hearing infants/toddlers as harmful; they feel that primary care providers should discuss genetic testing with them; and positive genetic test results with genetic counseling give rise to better understanding and perceived benefit than negative or inconclusive results. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19449415      PMCID: PMC2866144          DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  47 in total

1.  Genetic testing for hearing loss: different motivations for the same outcome.

Authors:  Orit Dagan; Hagit Hochner; Haya Levi; Annick Raas-Rothschild; Michal Sagi
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2002-11-22

Review 2.  Universal neonatal hearing screening moving from evidence to practice.

Authors:  C Kennedy; D McCann
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 3.  Genetic epidemiology of hearing impairment.

Authors:  N E Morton
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA1 gene testing.

Authors:  C Lerman; B Biesecker; J L Benkendorf; J Kerner; A Gomez-Caminero; C Hughes; M M Reed
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-01-15       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Psychological responses to BRCA1 mutation testing: preliminary findings.

Authors:  R T Croyle; K R Smith; J R Botkin; B Baty; J Nash
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.267

6.  Prevalence of major depression one year after predictive testing for Huntington's disease.

Authors:  Ann-Marie Codori; Phillip R Slavney; Adam Rosenblatt; Jason Brandt
Journal:  Genet Test       Date:  2004

7.  Attitudes toward genetic testing among the general population and relatives of patients with a severe genetic disease: a survey from Finland.

Authors:  M Hietala; A Hakonen; A R Aro; P Niemelä; L Peltonen; P Aula
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Attitudes of deaf individuals towards genetic testing.

Authors:  Patricia Rubal Taneja; Arti Pandya; Debra L Foley; Lauren Vanner Nicely; Kathleen S Arnos
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 2.802

9.  Prevalence and evolutionary origins of the del(GJB6-D13S1830) mutation in the DFNB1 locus in hearing-impaired subjects: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Ignacio Del Castillo; Miguel A Moreno-Pelayo; Francisco J Del Castillo; Zippora Brownstein; Sandrine Marlin; Quint Adina; David J Cockburn; Arti Pandya; Kirby R Siemering; G Parker Chamberlin; Ester Ballana; Wim Wuyts; Andréa Trevas Maciel-Guerra; Araceli Alvarez; Manuela Villamar; Mordechai Shohat; Dvorah Abeliovich; Hans-Henrik M Dahl; Xavier Estivill; Paolo Gasparini; Tim Hutchin; Walter E Nance; Edi L Sartorato; Richard J H Smith; Guy Van Camp; Karen B Avraham; Christine Petit; Felipe Moreno
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-10-21       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Genetics Evaluation Guidelines for the Etiologic Diagnosis of Congenital Hearing Loss. Genetic Evaluation of Congenital Hearing Loss Expert Panel. ACMG statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  13 in total

1.  Prevalence of genetic testing in CHARGE syndrome.

Authors:  Timothy S Hartshorne; Kasee K Stratton; Conny M A van Ravenswaaij-Arts
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Reprogenetics, Genetic Tools and Reproductive Risk: Attitudes and Understanding Among Ethnic Groups in Israel.

Authors:  Frida Simonstein; Michal Mashiach-Eizenberg
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Opinions of hearing parents about the causes of hearing impairment of their children with biallelic GJB2 mutations.

Authors:  Aisen V Solovyev; Lilya U Dzhemileva; Olga L Posukh; Nikolay A Barashkov; Marita S Bady-Khoo; Semen L Lobov; Natalya Yu Popova; Georgii P Romanov; Nikolay N Sazonov; Alexander A Bondar; Igor V Morozov; Mikhail I Tomsky; Sardana A Fedorova; Elza K Khusnutdinova
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2017-03-21

4.  Diagnostic exome sequencing in children: A survey of parental understanding, experience and psychological impact.

Authors:  J Wynn; R Ottman; J Duong; A L Wilson; P Ahimaz; J Martinez; R Rabin; E Rosen; R Webster; C Au; M T Cho; C Egan; E Guzman; M Primiano; J E Shaw; R Sisson; R L Klitzman; P S Appelbaum; U Lichter-Konecki; K Anyane-Yeboa; A Iglesias; W K Chung
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 4.438

5.  Perception of Genetic Testing for Deafness and Factors Associated with Interest in Genetic Testing Among Deaf People in a Selected Population in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Babatunde O Adedokun; Bidemi O Yusuf; J Taye Lasisi; A A Jinadu; M T Sunmonu; A F Ashanke; O Akeem Lasisi
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  A proposal for comprehensive newborn hearing screening to improve identification of deaf and hard-of-hearing children.

Authors:  A Eliot Shearer; Jun Shen; Sami Amr; Cynthia C Morton; Richard J Smith
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 8.864

7.  Non-syndromic sensorineural prelingual deafness: the importance of genetic counseling in demystifying parents' beliefs about the cause of their children's deafness.

Authors:  Fidjy Rodrigues; Milena Paneque; Cláudia Reis; Margarida Venâncio; Jorge Sequeiros; Jorge Saraiva
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Common genes for non-syndromic deafness are uncommon in sub-Saharan Africa: a report from Nigeria.

Authors:  Akeem O Lasisi; Guney Bademci; Joseph Foster; Susan Blanton; Mustafa Tekin
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 1.675

9.  Effect of pre-test genetic counseling for deaf adults on knowledge of genetic testing.

Authors:  Erin E Baldwin; Patrick Boudreault; Michelle Fox; Janet S Sinsheimer; Christina G S Palmer
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Impact of genetic counseling and Connexin-26 and Connexin-30 testing on deaf identity and comprehension of genetic test results in a sample of deaf adults: a prospective, longitudinal study.

Authors:  Christina G S Palmer; Patrick Boudreault; Erin E Baldwin; Janet S Sinsheimer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.