Literature DB >> 21624022

Imagined futures: how experiential knowledge of disability affects parents' decision making about fetal abnormality.

Emma F France1, Louise Locock, Kate Hunt, Sue Ziebland, Kate Field, Sally Wyke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of disability is considered key information to enable informed antenatal screening decisions by expectant parents. However, little is known about the role of experiential knowledge of disability in decisions to terminate or continue with a pregnancy diagnosed with a fetal abnormality.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the role that expectant parents' experiential knowledge of disabilities and conditions can play in real-life decisions to continue or end a pregnancy with a fetal abnormality.
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of qualitative narrative interview data informed by contextual systems framework.
SETTING: Participants were recruited throughout the United Kingdom and interviewed between 2004 and 2006. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-four women and four of their male partners who had direct or indirect experience of disability or illness and who had proceeded with or ended a pregnancy diagnosed with a fetal abnormality.
FINDINGS: Most respondents recounted using their experiential knowledge of disability, whether of their unborn baby's condition or of a different condition, to try to imagine the future for their unborn child, themselves and their family when making their decision. Some, who were considering continuing their pregnancy and had little or no experience of their unborn baby's specific disability, sought out others' experiences of the condition following antenatal diagnosis.The nature of a parent's experiential knowledge did not predict whether they continued with or terminated their pregnancy. DISCUSSION: Prospective parents may find it helpful to discuss their existing knowledge of their unborn baby's condition with health professionals who are aware of the influence this might have on parents' decisions.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21624022      PMCID: PMC5060609          DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00672.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  36 in total

Review 1.  Termination rates after prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome, spina bifida, anencephaly, and Turner and Klinefelter syndromes: a systematic literature review. European Concerted Action: DADA (Decision-making After the Diagnosis of a fetal Abnormality).

Authors:  C Mansfield; S Hopfer; T M Marteau
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 2.  Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data.

Authors:  C Pope; S Ziebland; N Mays
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-08

3.  Living with achondroplasia: attitudes toward population screening and correlation with quality of life.

Authors:  Sarah E Gollust; Richard E Thompson; Holly C Gooding; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 4.  Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries?

Authors:  I T Coyne
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.187

5.  The inclusion of patient testimonials in decision aids: effects on treatment choices.

Authors:  P A Ubel; C Jepson; J Baron
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Continuation of Pregnancy Following the Diagnosis of a Fetal Sex Chromosome Abnormality: A Study of Parents' Counseling Needs and Experiences.

Authors:  N Petrucelli; M Walker; E Schorry
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  How do patients evaluate and make use of online health information?

Authors:  Elizabeth Sillence; Pam Briggs; Peter Richard Harris; Lesley Fishwick
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Prenatal diagnosis for inherited deafness--what is the potential demand?

Authors:  A Middleton; J Hewison; R Mueller
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Attitudes toward genetic testing among the general population and relatives of patients with a severe genetic disease: a survey from Finland.

Authors:  M Hietala; A Hakonen; A R Aro; P Niemelä; L Peltonen; P Aula
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Thalassaemia carrier testing in Pakistani adults: behaviour, knowledge and attitudes.

Authors:  Shenaz Ahmed; Hilary Bekker; Jenny Hewison; Sally Kinsey
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2002
View more
  7 in total

1.  The implications of patients and carers as active agents in health care and the consequences for their own health, the health of their families and health system.

Authors:  Jonathan Tritter
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  It's complicated - Factors predicting decisional conflict in prenatal diagnostic testing.

Authors:  Cécile Muller; Linda D Cameron
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Disability Experiences and Perspectives Regarding Reproductive Decisions, Parenting, and the Utility of Genetic Services: a Qualitative Study.

Authors:  C Roadhouse; C Shuman; K Anstey; K Sappleton; D Chitayat; E Ignagni
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Presenting life with cystic fibrosis: a Q-methodological approach to developing balanced, experience-based prenatal screening information.

Authors:  Katherine F Wright; Louise D Bryant; Stephen Morley; Jenny Hewison; Alistair J A Duff; Daniel Peckham
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Parental decision-making following a prenatal diagnosis that is lethal, life-limiting, or has long term implications for the future child and family: a meta-synthesis of qualitative literature.

Authors:  Claire Blakeley; Debbie M Smith; Edward D Johnstone; Anja Wittkowski
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  Experience as knowledge: Disability, distillation and (reprogenetic) decision-making.

Authors:  Felicity K Boardman
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Neonatal End-of-Life Decision Making: The Possible Behavior of Greek Physicians, Midwives, and Nurses in Clinical Scenarios.

Authors:  Maria Dagla; Vasiliki Petousi; Antonios Poulios
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.