Literature DB >> 28980162

"My Plate is Full": Reasons for Declining a Genetic Evaluation of Hearing Loss.

Marci M Lesperance1, Erin Winkler2, Tori L Melendez3, Beverly M Yashar2,4.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to obtain patient and parent perspectives on genetic evaluation of hearing loss, in order to identify motivators, expectations, and barriers. Three focus groups were conducted following a semi-structured discussion guide, led by an independent moderator. Participants were hearing parents of children with permanent hearing loss or deaf adults. Qualitative content analysis was used to develop a codebook and identify major themes and subthemes. Participant views were compared to national guidelines. The 28 participants comprised 23 parents representing 21 unique families and 5 deaf adults. 13/21 families and 0/5 adults reported comorbidities, 4/21 families and 3/5 adults had a positive family history, and 12/21 families versus 0/5 adults had utilized genetics services. A common theme among adults and parents was a curiosity as to the cause of hearing loss. Parents were motivated to detect comorbidities and optimize care for hearing loss. Some parents felt overwhelmed by the hearing loss and unprepared to pursue early genetic evaluation as recommended in guidelines. Several reported positive experiences following genetics consultation, while others reported unease and unmet expectations. Notably, both parents and adults expressed ambivalence regarding the desire for genetic knowledge. Financial concerns and difficulties obtaining a referral were cited as extrinsic barriers. For parents of children with hearing loss, both the presence of comorbidities and a positive family history were drivers of genetics consultation and/or genetic testing. We identified educational opportunities for both patients and providers that would improve informed decision-making and increase access to genetic services. Consideration of the patient/family perspective and their decision-making processes, along with flexibility in the approach to genetics evaluation and its timing, will optimize both the development and implementation of guidelines.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autonomy; Comorbidities; Deafness; Genetic services; Hearing loss; Patient preferences

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28980162     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0149-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  33 in total

1.  Genetic testing for hearing loss: different motivations for the same outcome.

Authors:  Orit Dagan; Hagit Hochner; Haya Levi; Annick Raas-Rothschild; Michal Sagi
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2002-11-22

Review 2.  Quality of life in rare genetic conditions: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Julie S Cohen; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 3.  Evidence-based algorithm for the evaluation of a child with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Sanjay Morzaria; Brian D Westerberg; Frederick K Kozak
Journal:  J Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-10

Review 4.  Genetic epidemiology of hearing impairment.

Authors:  N E Morton
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Language of early- and later-identified children with hearing loss.

Authors:  C Yoshinaga-Itano; A L Sedey; D K Coulter; A L Mehl
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 6.  Adaptation to living with a genetic condition or risk: a mini-review.

Authors:  B B Biesecker; L Erby
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.438

7.  Ethnic differences in parental perceptions of genetic testing for deaf infants.

Authors:  Christina G S Palmer; Ariadna Martinez; Michelle Fox; Yvonne Sininger; Wayne W Grody; Lisa A Schimmenti
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-19       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  A focus group study of consumer attitudes toward genetic testing and newborn screening for deafness.

Authors:  Sarah K Burton; Kara Withrow; Kathleen S Arnos; Andrea L Kalfoglou; Arti Pandya
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guideline for the clinical evaluation and etiologic diagnosis of hearing loss.

Authors:  Raye L Alford; Kathleen S Arnos; Michelle Fox; Jerry W Lin; Christina G Palmer; Arti Pandya; Heidi L Rehm; Nathaniel H Robin; Daryl A Scott; Christine Yoshinaga-Itano
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Technical report: Ethical and policy issues in genetic testing and screening of children.

Authors:  Lainie Friedman Ross; Laine Friedman Ross; Howard M Saal; Karen L David; Rebecca R Anderson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.