Literature DB >> 30507555

On the parameters used in finite element modeling of compound peripheral nerves.

Nicole A Pelot1, Christina E Behrend, Warren M Grill.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Computational modeling is an important tool for developing and optimizing implantable neural stimulation devices, but requires accurate electrical and geometrical parameter values to improve predictive value. We quantified the effects of perineurial (resistive sheath around each fascicle) and endoneurial (within each fascicle) parameter values for modeling peripheral nerve stimulation. APPROACH: We implemented 3D finite element models of compound peripheral nerves and cuff electrodes to quantify activation and block thresholds of model axons. We also implemented a 2D finite element model of a bundle of axons to estimate the bulk transverse endoneurial resistivity; we compared numerical estimates to an analytical solution. MAIN
RESULTS: Since the perineurium is highly resistive, potentials were approximately constant over the cross section of a fascicle, and the perineurium resistivity, longitudinal endoneurial resistivity, and fascicle diameter had important effects on thresholds. Activation thresholds increased up to ~130% for higher perineurium resistivity (~400 versus 2200 Ω m) and by ~35%-250% for lower longitudinal endoneurial resistivity (3.5 versus 0.75 Ω m), with larger increases for smaller diameter axons and for axons in larger fascicles. Further, thresholds increased by ~30%-180% for larger fascicle radii, yielding a larger increase with higher perineurium resistivity. Thresholds were largely insensitive to the transverse endoneurial resistivity, but estimates of the bulk resistivity increased with extracellular resistivity and axonal area fraction; the numerical and analytical estimates were in strong agreement except at high axonal area fractions, where structured axon placements that achieved tighter packing produced electric field inhomogeneities. SIGNIFICANCE: We performed a systematic investigation of the effects of values and methods for modeling the perineurium and endoneurium on thresholds for neural stimulation and block. These results provide guidance for future modeling studies, including parameter selection, data interpretation, and comparison to experimental results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30507555      PMCID: PMC7309635          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aaeb0c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  61 in total

1.  New measurements of the capacity and the resistance of the myelin sheath and the nodal membrane of the isolated frog nerve fiber.

Authors:  I TASAKI
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1955-06

2.  Application of a computational model of vagus nerve stimulation.

Authors:  S L Helmers; J Begnaud; A Cowley; H M Corwin; J C Edwards; D L Holder; H Kostov; P G Larsson; P M Levisohn; M S De Menezes; H Stefan; D M Labiner
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 3.209

3.  Effects of high-frequency alternating current on axonal conduction through the vagus nerve.

Authors:  Jonathan J Waataja; Katherine S Tweden; Christopher N Honda
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Computational analysis of kilohertz frequency spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain management.

Authors:  Scott F Lempka; Cameron C McIntyre; Kevin L Kilgore; Andre G Machado
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Modeling extracellular electrical stimulation: I. Derivation and interpretation of neurite equations.

Authors:  Hamish Meffin; Bahman Tahayori; David B Grayden; Anthony N Burkitt
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Modeling the excitability of mammalian nerve fibers: influence of afterpotentials on the recovery cycle.

Authors:  Cameron C McIntyre; Andrew G Richardson; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Vagus nerve anatomy at the lower esophagus and stomach. A study of 100 cadavers.

Authors:  T L Zhu; J S Tan; Z X Zhang; B K Zhang; Y P Ma
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 2.628

8.  Histopathologic features of the vagus nerve after electrical stimulation in swine.

Authors:  I Díaz-Güemes Martín-Portugués; F M Sánchez Margallo; S Pascual Sánchez-Gijón; V Crisóstomo Ayala; J Usón Gargallo
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  Drug discovery: a jump-start for electroceuticals.

Authors:  Kristoffer Famm; Brian Litt; Kevin J Tracey; Edward S Boyden; Moncef Slaoui
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Electron microscopy of tissue adherent to explanted electrodes in dystonia and Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  J Moss; T Ryder; T Z Aziz; M B Graeber; P G Bain
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2004-08-25       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  13 in total

1.  3D imaging of the vagus nerve fascicular anatomy with cryo-imaging and UV excitation.

Authors:  Chaitanya Kolluru; Ananya Subramaniam; Yehe Liu; Aniruddha Upadhye; Monty Khela; Lindsey Druschel; Farzad Fereidouni; Richard Levenson; Andrew Shoffstall; Michael Jenkins; David L Wilson
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2021-03-05

2.  Computational modelling of nerve stimulation and recording with peripheral visceral neural interfaces.

Authors:  Calvin D Eiber; Sophie C Payne; Natalia P Biscola; Leif A Havton; Janet R Keast; Peregrine B Osborne; James B Fallon
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Non-monotonic kilohertz frequency neural block thresholds arise from amplitude- and frequency-dependent charge imbalance.

Authors:  Edgar Peña; Nicole A Pelot; Warren M Grill
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  A computational outlook on neurostimulation.

Authors:  Marco Capogrosso; Scott F Lempka
Journal:  Bioelectron Med       Date:  2020-05-25

5.  A computational model to design neural interfaces for lower-limb sensory neuroprostheses.

Authors:  Marek Zelechowski; Giacomo Valle; Stanisa Raspopovic
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  Quantified Morphology of the Cervical and Subdiaphragmatic Vagus Nerves of Human, Pig, and Rat.

Authors:  Nicole A Pelot; Gabriel B Goldhagen; Jake E Cariello; Eric D Musselman; Kara A Clissold; J Ashley Ezzell; Warren M Grill
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Quantification of clinically applicable stimulation parameters for precision near-organ neuromodulation of human splenic nerves.

Authors:  Isha Gupta; Antonino M Cassará; Ilya Tarotin; Matteo Donega; Jason A Miranda; David M Sokal; Sebastien Ouchouche; Wesley Dopson; Paul Matteucci; Esra Neufeld; Matthew A Schiefer; Alison Rowles; Paul McGill; Justin Perkins; Nikola Dolezalova; Kourosh Saeb-Parsy; Niels Kuster; Refet Firat Yazicioglu; Jason Witherington; Daniel J Chew
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2020-10-16

8.  Augmented Transcutaneous Stimulation Using an Injectable Electrode: A Computational Study.

Authors:  Nishant Verma; Robert D Graham; Jonah Mudge; James K Trevathan; Manfred Franke; Andrew J Shoffstall; Justin Williams; Ashley N Dalrymple; Lee E Fisher; Douglas J Weber; Scott F Lempka; Kip A Ludwig
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-12-20

9.  Human organ donor-derived vagus nerve biopsies allow for well-preserved ultrastructure and high-resolution mapping of myelinated and unmyelinated fibers.

Authors:  Leif A Havton; Natalia P Biscola; Esther Stern; Plamen V Mihaylov; Chandrashekhar A Kubal; John M Wo; Anita Gupta; Elizabeth Baronowsky; Matthew P Ward; Deborah M Jaffey; Terry L Powley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Quantitative comparisons of block thresholds and onset responses for charge-balanced kilohertz frequency waveforms.

Authors:  Edgar Peña; Nicole A Pelot; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.