| Literature DB >> 16515707 |
Bernd Gagel1, Patrick Reinartz, Cengiz Demirel, Hans J Kaiser, Michael Zimny, Marc Piroth, Michael Pinkawa, Sven Stanzel, Branka Asadpour, Kurt Hamacher, Heinz H Coenen, Ulrich Buell, Michael J Eble.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Experimental and clinical evidence suggest that hypoxia in solid tumours reduces their sensitivity to conventional treatment modalities modulating response to ionizing radiation or chemotherapeutic agents. The aim of the present study was to show the feasibility of determining radiotherapeutically relevant hypoxia and early tumour response by ([18F] Fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) and [18F]-2-fluoro-2'-deoxyglucose (FDG) PET.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16515707 PMCID: PMC1456976 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-6-51
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Characteristics of the population
| Characteristics | |
| Age | Years |
| Mean | 58 |
| Median | 56 |
| Range | 41–76 |
| Sex | No. of patients |
| Male | 5 |
| Female | 3 |
| ECOG performance scale | |
| 0 | 4 |
| 1 | 4 |
| Clinical stage | |
| IIIA | 1 |
| IIIB | 6 |
| IV | 1 |
| Histology | |
| Adenocarzinoma | 3 |
| Squamous carcinoma | 4 |
| Adenosquamous carcinoma | 0 |
| Large-cell carcinoma | 1 |
ECOG performance Scale: 0 – normal activity; asymptomytic
1 – symptomatic; fully ambulatory
Figure 1Development in haemoglobin concentrations. Change in haemoglobin concentrations during the course of chemotherapy. Mean difference in Hb concentration was 1.7 g/dl (SD = 0.4 g/dl) between baseline and final laboratory testing (paired T-test; p = 0.033)
Patient data of FDG and FMISO PET (; increase of mean SUV of FDG uptake)
| 1 | 1.90 | 1.40 | 2.12 | 1.83 | 1.12 | 1.04 | 9.70 | 7.70 | 12.32 | 8.16 |
| 2 | 2.20 | 1.40 | 2.48 | 1.63 | 1.45 | 1.26 | 17.10 | 8.10 | 20.19 | 9.69 |
| 3 | 1.90 | 1.90 | 2.57 | 2.43 | 1.54 | 1.36 | 14.10 | 7.10 | 16.28 | 7.96 |
| 4 | 3.70 | 2.20 | 4.59 | 2.43 | 5.85 | 1.51 | 14.00 | 8.30 | 19.02 | 9.40 |
| 7b | 2.60 | 2.00 | 3.02 | 2.34 | 1.86 | 1.52 | 8.60 | 5.10 | 11.85 | 7.15 |
| Mean | 2.31 | 1.83 | 2.77 | 2.19 | 1.99 | 1.36 | 10.47 | 8.54 | 13.23 | 10.30 |
| SD | 0.20 | 0.12 | 0.27 | 0.13 | 0.49 | 0.08 | 1.50 | 0.63 | 1.80 | 0.86 |
SUV = standard uptake value; Tu./Musc. = tumour to muscle ratio; Cht. = chemotherapy
Differences in FDG and FMISO PET data before and after chemotherapy (; increase in mean SUV of FDG uptake); * kidney metastasis as well as an early local tumour progression; †local PR but disseminated lung metastases.
| post Cht. | post RT/Cht. | |||||
| 1 | -0.50 | -0.08 | -2.00 | -4,16 | PR | CR |
| 2 | -0.80 | -0.19 | -9.00 | -10.50 | PR | |
| 3 | 0.00 | -0.14 | -7.00 | -8.32 | PR | CR |
| 4 | -1.50 | -4.34 | -5.70 | -9.62 | PR | PR |
| 7b | -0.60 | -0.34 | -3.50 | -4.70 | PR | PR |
| Mean | -0.48 | -0.62 | -1.92 | -2.93 | ||
| SD | 0.17 | 0.47 | 1.73 | 2.34 | ||
SUV = standard uptake value; Tu./Musc. = tumour to muscle ratio; Cht. = chemotherapy
Figure 2Patient with differences in FMISO uptake. Patient with different FMISO uptake in the primary tumour at the right hilus (coronar slices of the posterior mediastinum, anterior view of thorax) and in one large lymph node metastasis in the right mediastinum (coronar slices of the anterior mediastinum, anterior view of thorax) after chemotherapy: discrepant tumour response according to tumour oxygenation. Cht. = chemotherapy, SD = stable disease, PR = partial remission, R = right side