Literature DB >> 12560430

Whole body 18FDG-PET and the response of esophageal cancer to induction therapy: results of a prospective trial.

Robert J Downey1, Tim Akhurst, David Ilson, Robert Ginsberg, Manjit S Bains, Mithat Gonen, Heng Koong, Marc Gollub, Bruce D Minsky, Maureen Zakowski, Alan Turnbull, Steven M Larson, Valerie Rusch.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Whole-body 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging before and after induction therapy was prospectively evaluated in patients with esophageal cancer to determine whether changes in PET images could measure response to therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between April 1997 and April 1999, 39 patients (34 men and five women; median age, 59 years; range, 36 to 76 years) with esophageal cancer were prospectively enrolled in a single-institution clinical trial of staging, including PET, induction therapy, restaging including PET, and esophagectomy. All patients undergoing esophagectomy after induction therapy (n = 17) were followed either to recurrence, to death, or through a disease-free interval of at least 24 months.
RESULTS: PET after standard staging studies and before therapy imaged undetected sites of metastatic disease in six patients (15%). Restaging (including PET) after induction therapy did not identify any patients with disease progression or any patients with loco-regionally unresectable disease at exploration. The median decrease in the standardized uptake value (SUV) during induction therapy was 59%. After R0 esophagectomy, the 2-year disease-free and overall survival was 38% and 63%, respectively, among patients who had a less than 60% decrease in SUV, and 67% and 89%, respectively, among patients who had a greater than 60% decrease in SUV (P =.055 and P =.088, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Compared with conventional imaging, PET detects additional sites of metastatic disease at initial evaluation. After induction therapy, PET did not add to the estimation of loco-regional resectability and did not detect new distant metastases. However, changes in [18F]FDG PET may predict disease-free and overall survival after induction therapy and resection in patients with esophageal cancer. Further evaluation in larger trials is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12560430     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  81 in total

1.  Accuracy of PET-CT in predicting survival in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Claire Brown; Ben Howes; Glyn G Jamieson; Dylan Bartholomeusz; Urs Zingg; Thomas R Sullivan; Sarah K Thompson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Positron emission tomography's changing significance in the treatment of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Shane Hopkins; Gary Yang
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2009-10-15

3.  [Neoadjuvant therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus].

Authors:  F Lordick
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 4.  [18F-FDG-PET in therapy response of esophageal cancer].

Authors:  H A Wieder; K Herrmann; K Ott; B J Krause
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Clinical significance of primary lesion FDG uptake for choice between oesophagectomy and endoscopic submucosal dissection for resectable oesophageal squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Masatoyo Nakajo; Masayuki Nakajo; Atsushi Tani; Yoriko Kajiya; Shunji Shimaoka; Akio Matsuda; Tatsuyuki Nioh; Tohru Nihara; Toyokuni Suenaga; Sadao Tanaka; Hiroshi Shirahama; Michiyo Higashi; Chihaya Koriyama
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Quantitative assessment of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in patients with primary rectal cancer: correlation with FDG-PET/CT.

Authors:  Jing Gu; Pek-Lan Khong; Silun Wang; Queenie Chan; Wailun Law; Jingbo Zhang
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Staging with PET and the "Will Rogers" effect: redefining prognosis and survival in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Sandip Basu; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Risk stratification for recurrence in patients with esophageal and junctional carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery.

Authors:  S Dixit; M Tilston; W M Peter
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 3.064

9.  The evaluation of esophageal adenocarcinoma using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Eugene Y Chang; Xin Li; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Ryan A Priest; C Kristian Enestvedt; Jingang Xu; Charles S Springer; Blair A Jobe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Surgical management of esophagogastric junction tumors.

Authors:  Burkhard H A von Rahden; Hubert J Stein; J Rüdiger Siewert
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.