Literature DB >> 8622014

Noninvasive monitoring of tumor metabolism using fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography in colorectal cancer liver metastases: correlation with tumor response to fluorouracil.

M Findlay1, H Young, D Cunningham, A Iveson, B Cronin, T Hickish, B Pratt, J Husband, M Flower, R Ott.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate and measure the metabolism of colorectal cancer liver metastases using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET), before and during the first month of chemotherapy. The findings were compared with tumor outcome conventionally assessed using changes in tumor size. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases were treated with fluorouracil (5FU) as a protracted venous infusion (300 mg/m2/d), with or without interferon-alpha 2b for two 10-week blocks separated by a 2-week break. Before and at 1 to 2 and 4 to 5 weeks on treatment, FDG PET scans were performed. Patients fasted, were injected intravenously with FDG (50 to 100 MBq), and scanned using a large-area positron camera; the image data was processed such that regions of interest could be identified. The results were expressed as a ratio of FDG uptake in the tumor and normal liver (T:L) or as a semiquantitative standardized uptake value (SUV). These measures were compared with the tumor dimensions measured on a computed tomographic (CT) scan performed at 12 weeks from commencement of chemotherapy.
RESULTS: Twenty patients were studied; however, two did not have assessable liver metastases. Objective partial responses were observed in 11 of 18 patients. A total of 27 metastatic lesions were assessable. Pretreatment T:L ratios and SUVs did not correlate with tumor response, although response was associated with lower 1- to 2-week (1.84 v 2.17; t=2.667; P < .02) and 4- to 5-week (1.36 v 2.28; t=5.02; P < .001) T:L ratios, and 4- to 5-week (3.57 v 4.95; t=2.492; P < .05) SUVs. Expressed as a percent of the baseline values of the T:L ratio, responding lesions had a greater reduction in metabolism (67% v 99%; t=7.53; P < .001). The 4- to 5-week T:L ratio was able to discriminate response from nonresponse both in a lesion-by-lesion and overall patient response assessment (sensitivity 100%; specificity 90% and 75%, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Positron emission tomography used to evaluate the uptake of FDG in tumors yields data that correlate with the antitumor effect of chemotherapy in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8622014     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.3.700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  49 in total

Review 1.  Positron emission tomography (PET): expanding the horizons of oncology drug development.

Authors:  Lisa A Hammond; Louis Denis; Umber Salman; Paul Jerabek; Charles R Thomas; John G Kuhn
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 2.  18F-Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of gastrointestinal malignancies.

Authors:  B B Chin; R L Wahl
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Use of positron emission tomography in anticancer drug development.

Authors:  Eric O Aboagye; Patricia M Price
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.850

4.  The impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with liver metastases.

Authors:  Siew C Chua; Ashley M Groves; Irfan Kayani; Leon Menezes; Svetislav Gacinovic; Yong Du; Jamshed B Bomanji; Peter J Ell
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  [18F]FDG-PET predicts complete pathological response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Alina Berriolo-Riedinger; Claude Touzery; Jean-Marc Riedinger; Michel Toubeau; Bruno Coudert; Laurent Arnould; Christophe Boichot; Alexandre Cochet; Pierre Fumoleau; François Brunotte
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Carbon-11-methionine positron emission tomography imaging of chordoma.

Authors:  Hong Zhang; Kyosan Yoshikawa; Katsumi Tamura; Kenji Sagou; Mei Tian; Tetsuya Suhara; Susumu Kandatsu; Kazutoshi Suzuki; Shuji Tanada; Hirohiko Tsujii
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2004-07-28       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Does the novel PET/CT imaging modality impact on the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer of the liver?

Authors:  Markus Selzner; Thomas F Hany; Peer Wildbrett; Lucas McCormack; Zakiyah Kadry; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Staging of the axilla in breast cancer: accurate in vivo assessment using positron emission tomography with 2-(fluorine-18)-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose.

Authors:  I C Smith; K N Ogston; P Whitford; F W Smith; P Sharp; M Norton; I D Miller; A K Ah-See; S D Heys; J A Jibril; O Eremin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  PET scans as a predictive marker of survival in advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Minsig Choi; Sri Lakshmi S Kollepara; Lance K Heilbrun; Daryn Smith; Anthony F Shields; Philip A Philip
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 4.481

10.  F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the context of other imaging techniques and prognostic factors in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Twyla B Bartel; Jeff Haessler; Tracy L Y Brown; John D Shaughnessy; Frits van Rhee; Elias Anaissie; Terri Alpe; Edgardo Angtuaco; Ronald Walker; Joshua Epstein; John Crowley; Bart Barlogie
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 22.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.