PURPOSE: To prospectively study the capacity of positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) to determine response soon after radical radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy and, thereby, predict survival. PET is known to provide a more accurate estimate of true extent of disease than CT when used to stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-three patients with NSCLC underwent [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET and CT scans before and after radical radiotherapy (n = 10) or chemoradiotherapy (n = 63). Follow-up PET scans were performed at a median of 70 days after radiotherapy. The median PET-CT interval was 1 day. Each patient had determinations of response to therapy made with PET and CT, categorized as complete response, partial response, no response, progressive disease, or nonassessable. Responses were correlated with subsequent survival. RESULTS: Median survival after follow-up PET was 24 months. There was poor agreement between PET and CT responses (weighted kappa = 0.35), which were identical in only 40% of patients. There were significantly more complete responders on PET (n = 34) than CT (n = 10), whereas fewer patients were judged to be nonresponders (12 patients on PET v 20 on CT) or nonassessable (zero patients on PET v six on CT) by PET. Both CT and PET responses were individually significantly associated with survival duration; but on multifactor analysis that included the known prognostic factors of CT response, performance status, weight loss, and stage, only PET response was significantly associated with survival duration (P <.0001). CONCLUSION: In NSCLC, a single, early, posttreatment PET scan is a better predictor of survival than CT response, stage, or pretreatment performance status.
PURPOSE: To prospectively study the capacity of positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) to determine response soon after radical radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy and, thereby, predict survival. PET is known to provide a more accurate estimate of true extent of disease than CT when used to stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-three patients with NSCLC underwent [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET and CT scans before and after radical radiotherapy (n = 10) or chemoradiotherapy (n = 63). Follow-up PET scans were performed at a median of 70 days after radiotherapy. The median PET-CT interval was 1 day. Each patient had determinations of response to therapy made with PET and CT, categorized as complete response, partial response, no response, progressive disease, or nonassessable. Responses were correlated with subsequent survival. RESULTS: Median survival after follow-up PET was 24 months. There was poor agreement between PET and CT responses (weighted kappa = 0.35), which were identical in only 40% of patients. There were significantly more complete responders on PET (n = 34) than CT (n = 10), whereas fewer patients were judged to be nonresponders (12 patients on PET v 20 on CT) or nonassessable (zero patients on PET v six on CT) by PET. Both CT and PET responses were individually significantly associated with survival duration; but on multifactor analysis that included the known prognostic factors of CT response, performance status, weight loss, and stage, only PET response was significantly associated with survival duration (P <.0001). CONCLUSION: In NSCLC, a single, early, posttreatment PET scan is a better predictor of survival than CT response, stage, or pretreatment performance status.
Authors: I Zerizer; A Al-Nahhas; D Towey; P Tait; B Ariff; H Wasan; G Hatice; N Habib; T Barwick Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2012-05-30 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Dirk Hellwig; Andreas Gröschel; Thomas P Graeter; Anne P Hellwig; Ursula Nestle; Hans-Joachim Schäfers; Gerhard W Sybrecht; Carl-Martin Kirsch Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2005-09-09 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Michael MacManus; Sarah Everitt; Tanja Schimek-Jasch; X Allen Li; Ursula Nestle; Feng-Ming Spring Kong Journal: Transl Lung Cancer Res Date: 2017-12
Authors: Mitchell Machtay; Fenghai Duan; Barry A Siegel; Bradley S Snyder; Jeremy J Gorelick; Janet S Reddin; Reginald Munden; Douglas W Johnson; Larry H Wilf; Albert DeNittis; Nancy Sherwin; Kwan Ho Cho; Seok-Ki Kim; Gregory Videtic; Donald R Neumann; Ritsuko Komaki; Homer Macapinlac; Jeffrey D Bradley; Abass Alavi Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-09-16 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Willem Grootjans; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Esther G C Troost; Eric P Visser; Wim J G Oyen; Johan Bussink Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 66.675