Literature DB >> 26200891

Expectations developed over multiple timescales facilitate visual search performance.

Nikos Gekas, Aaron R Seitz, Peggy Seriès.   

Abstract

Our perception of the world is strongly influenced by our expectations, and a question of key importance is how the visual system develops and updates its expectations through interaction with the environment. We used a visual search task to investigate how expectations of different timescales (from the last few trials to hours to long-term statistics of natural scenes) interact to alter perception. We presented human observers with low-contrast white dots at 12 possible locations equally spaced on a circle, and we asked them to simultaneously identify the presence and location of the dots while manipulating their expectations by presenting stimuli at some locations more frequently than others. Our findings suggest that there are strong acuity differences between absolute target locations (e.g., horizontal vs. vertical) and preexisting long-term biases influencing observers' detection and localization performance, respectively. On top of these, subjects quickly learned about the stimulus distribution, which improved their detection performance but caused increased false alarms at the most frequently presented stimulus locations. Recent exposure to a stimulus resulted in significantly improved detection performance and significantly more false alarms but only at locations at which it was more probable that a stimulus would be presented. Our results can be modeled and understood within a Bayesian framework in terms of a near-optimal integration of sensory evidence with rapidly learned statistical priors, which are skewed toward the very recent history of trials and may help understanding the time scale of developing expectations at the neural level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26200891      PMCID: PMC4511121          DOI: 10.1167/15.9.10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  62 in total

1.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Konrad P Körding; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  How can a Bayesian approach inform neuroscience?

Authors:  Jill X O'Reilly; Saad Jbabdi; Timothy E J Behrens
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Rapidly learned stimulus expectations alter perception of motion.

Authors:  Matthew Chalk; Aaron R Seitz; Peggy Seriès
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 4.  Statistical decision theory to relate neurons to behavior in the study of covert visual attention.

Authors:  Miguel P Eckstein; Matthew F Peterson; Binh T Pham; Jason A Droll
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Flexible visual statistical learning: transfer across space and time.

Authors:  Nicholas B Turk-Browne; Brian J Scholl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  A Bayesian model for efficient visual search and recognition.

Authors:  Lior Elazary; Laurent Itti
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

8.  The ganglion cell and cone distributions in the monkey's retina: implications for central magnification factors.

Authors:  V H Perry; A Cowey
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Covert visual search: prior beliefs are optimally combined with sensory evidence.

Authors:  Benjamin Vincent
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 10.  Expectation (and attention) in visual cognition.

Authors:  Christopher Summerfield; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  3 in total

1.  Variance misperception under skewed empirical noise statistics explains overconfidence in the visual periphery.

Authors:  Charles J Winter; Megan A K Peters
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Perception of action-outcomes is shaped by life-long and contextual expectations.

Authors:  Myrthel Dogge; Ruud Custers; Surya Gayet; Herbert Hoijtink; Henk Aarts
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Implicit expectation modulates multisensory perception.

Authors:  Mick Zeljko; Philip M Grove; Ada Kritikos
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.199

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.