Literature DB >> 8664231

Analysis of visual field progression in glaucoma.

F W Fitzke1, R A Hitchings, D Poinoosawmy, A I McNaught, D P Crabb.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread use of computerised perimetry the diagnosis of visual field deterioration in following glaucoma patients over time remains particularly difficult. A new method of analysis using a novel graphical display of longitudinal field data is presented.
METHODS: A linear regression model of the luminance sensitivity at each stimulus location against time of follow up transforms the quantitative data from a series of fields into a colour coded form which illustrates the spatial configuration of change to aid the interpretation of field loss. The method of analysis and the developed computer software (PROGRESSOR) is described. Comparison with STATPAC-2 glaucoma change probability analysis is given including levels of agreement between the techniques using series of fields of 10 eyes from patients with normal tension glaucoma.
RESULTS: Examples of this new method compare well with STATPAC-2 analysis. The level of agreement between the techniques to separate progressing from stable retinal locations is good (kappa = 0.62; SE = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: This new technique, which combines the change in perimetric sensitivity over time with colour coding of significant change into one image may provide an efficient method to detect true progression in glaucomatous field loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8664231      PMCID: PMC505382          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.80.1.40

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  21 in total

1.  Do computerised visual fields and automated optic disc analysis assist in the choice of therapy in glaucoma?

Authors:  F S Mikelberg
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Does computerised perimetry offer practical advances in choice of therapy in the glaucoma patient?

Authors:  H Dunbar Hoskins
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  The progress of the visual field in chronic simple glaucoma and ocular hypertension treated topically with pilocarpine or with timolol.

Authors:  R P Crick; R B Newson; M J Shipley; H Blackmore; C J Bulpitt
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Statpac 2 glaucoma change probability.

Authors:  R K Morgan; W J Feuer; D R Anderson
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-12

5.  Regression analysis of visual field progression in low tension glaucoma.

Authors:  B N Noureddin; D Poinoosawmy; F W Fietzke; R A Hitchings
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  The visual field in chronic open angle glaucoma: the rate of change in different regions of the field.

Authors:  C O'Brien; B Schwartz
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  New approach to estimating variability in visual field data using an image processing technique.

Authors:  D P Crabb; D F Edgar; F W Fitzke; A I McNaught; H P Wynn
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  The mode of progression of visual field defects in glaucoma.

Authors:  F S Mikelberg; S M Drance
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-10-15       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  Intraocular pressure and the rate of visual field loss in chronic open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  C O'Brien; B Schwartz; T Takamoto; D C Wu
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-04-15       Impact factor: 5.258

View more
  54 in total

1.  Frequency of testing for detecting visual field progression.

Authors:  S K Gardiner; D P Crabb
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  The rate of visual field change in the ocular hypertension treatment study.

Authors:  Shaban Demirel; Carlos Gustavo V De Moraes; Stuart K Gardiner; Jeffrey M Liebmann; George A Cioffi; Robert Ritch; Mae O Gordon; Michael A Kass
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Effect of treatment on the rate of visual field change in the ocular hypertension treatment study observation group.

Authors:  Carlos Gustavo De Moraes; Shaban Demirel; Stuart K Gardiner; Jeffrey M Liebmann; George A Cioffi; Robert Ritch; Mae O Gordon; Michael A Kass
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Bayes' theorem applied to perimetric progression detection in glaucoma: from specificity to positive predictive value.

Authors:  Nomdo M Jansonius
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  A spatially varying change points model for monitoring glaucoma progression using visual field data.

Authors:  Samuel I Berchuck; Jean-Claude Mwanza; Joshua L Warren
Journal:  Spat Stat       Date:  2019-02-22

Review 6.  [Conventional techniques of visual field examination: part 4 Static perimetry: interpretation--perimetric indices--follow-up--perimetry in childhood].

Authors:  U Schiefer; J Pätzold; B Wabbels; F Dannheim
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  Stabilization and comparison of TOP and Bracketing perimetric strategies using a threshold spatial filter.

Authors:  Manuel Gonzalez de la Rosa; Marta Gonzalez-Hernandez; Tinguaro Diaz Aleman; Manuel Sanchez Mendez
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Long-term follow-up of superior segmental optic hypoplasia.

Authors:  Keiko Hayashi; Atsuo Tomidokoro; Makoto Aihara; Hideki Tsuji; Shiroaki Shirato; Makoto Araie
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 2.447

9.  Visual field progression: comparison of Humphrey Statpac2 and pointwise linear regression analysis.

Authors:  A I McNaught; D P Crabb; F W Fitzke; R A Hitchings
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 10.  Normal tension glaucoma--a practical approach.

Authors:  D Kamal; R Hitchings
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.