Literature DB >> 9374242

A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry, SITA.

B Bengtsson1, J Olsson, A Heijl, H Rootzén.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to develop a new family of test algorithms for computerized static threshold perimetry which significantly reduces test time without any reduction of data quality.
METHODS: A comprehensive visual field model constructed from available knowledge of normal and glaucomatous visual fields is continuously updated during testing. The model produces threshold estimates and also estimates of the certainty to which the threshold is known at each point. Testing is interrupted at each test location at predetermined levels of threshold certainty. New time-saving methods are employed for estimation of false answers, and test pacing is optimized. After completion of the test, all threshold estimates are re-computed, taking into account the complete body of patient responses. Computer simulations were used to optimize the different parameters of the new algorithms, to evaluate the relative importance of those parameters, and to evaluate the performance of the algorithm as a whole in comparison with a standard algorithm.
RESULTS: Simulated test results obtained with this algorithm were slightly more accurate than those of the Humphrey Full Threshold test algorithm. The number of simulated stimuli presented was reduced by an average of 29% in normal fields and 26% in glaucomatous fields. Actual clinical test time should be further reduced, since the influence of the improved timing algorithm was not included in the simulations.
CONCLUSIONS: We applied new methods which take available knowledge of visual field physiology and pathophysiology into account, and employ modern computer-intensive mathematical methods for real time estimates of threshold values and threshold error estimates. In this way it was possible to design a family of testing algorithms which significantly reduced perimetric test time without any loss of quality in results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9374242     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.1997.tb00392.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand        ISSN: 1395-3907


  126 in total

Review 1.  Acquired colour vision defects in glaucoma-their detection and clinical significance.

Authors:  M Pacheco-Cutillas; D F Edgar; A Sahraie
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Frequency of testing for detecting visual field progression.

Authors:  S K Gardiner; D P Crabb
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES): III. Ancestry differences in visual function in healthy eyes.

Authors:  Lyne Racette; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Christopher A Girkin; Linda M Zangwill; Sonia Jain; Lida M Becerra; Felipe A Medeiros; Christopher Bowd; Robert N Weinreb; Catherine Boden; Pamela A Sample
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-05

4.  A comparison of perimetric results with the Medmont and Humphrey perimeters.

Authors:  J Landers; A Sharma; I Goldberg; S Graham
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  A few remarks about glaucoma.

Authors:  A Wegner
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  The rate of visual field change in the ocular hypertension treatment study.

Authors:  Shaban Demirel; Carlos Gustavo V De Moraes; Stuart K Gardiner; Jeffrey M Liebmann; George A Cioffi; Robert Ritch; Mae O Gordon; Michael A Kass
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Influence of clinically invisible, but optical coherence tomography detected, optic disc margin anatomy on neuroretinal rim evaluation.

Authors:  Alexandre S C Reis; Neil O'Leary; Hongli Yang; Glen P Sharpe; Marcelo T Nicolela; Claude F Burgoyne; Balwantray C Chauhan
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm for central visual field defects unrelated to nerve fiber layer.

Authors:  Kazunori Hirasawa; Nobuyuki Shoji
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Comparing the full-threshold and Swedish interactive thresholding algorithms for short-wavelength automated perimetry.

Authors:  Minna Ng; Lyne Racette; John P Pascual; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Christopher A Girkin; Sarah L Lovell; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb; Pamela A Sample
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 10.  Fundus-driven perimetry (microperimetry) compared to conventional static automated perimetry: similarities, differences, and clinical applications.

Authors:  Jennifer H Acton; Vivienne C Greenstein
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 1.882

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.