Literature DB >> 16481615

Spatial heterogeneity, predator cognition, and the evolution of color polymorphism in virtual prey.

Alan B Bond1, Alan C Kamil.   

Abstract

Cryptically colored prey species are often polymorphic, occurring in multiple distinctive pattern variants. Visual predators promote such phenotypic variation through apostatic selection, in which they attack more abundant prey types disproportionately often. In heterogeneous environments, disruptive selection to match the coloration of disparate habitat patches could also produce polymorphism, but how apostatic and disruptive selection interact in these circumstances is unknown. Here we report the first controlled selection experiment on the evolution of prey coloration on heterogeneous backgrounds, in which blue jays (Cyanocitta cristata) searched for digital moths on mixtures of dark and light patches at three different scales of heterogeneity. As predicted by ecological theory, coarse-grained backgrounds produced a functional dimorphism of specialists on the two patch types; fine-grained backgrounds produced generalists. The searching strategies of the jays also varied with the habitat configuration, however. Complex backgrounds with many moth-like features elicited a slow, serial search that depended heavily on selective attention. The result was increased apostatic selection, producing a broad range of moth phenotypes. Backgrounds with larger, more uniform patches allowed the birds to focus on the currently most rewarding patch type and to search entire patches rapidly in parallel. The result was less apostatic selection and lower phenotypic variability. The evolution of polymorphism in camouflaged prey depends on a complex interaction between habitat structure and predator cognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16481615      PMCID: PMC1413896          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0509963103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  14 in total

1.  From parallel to serial processing: a computational study of visual search.

Authors:  E Cohen; E Ruppin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-10

2.  Predator and prey views of spider camouflage.

Authors:  Marc Théry; Jérôme Casas
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-10       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  The genetics and evo-devo of butterfly wing patterns.

Authors:  Patrícia Beldade; Paul M Brakefield
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Segmentation of objects from backgrounds in visual search tasks.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Aude Oliva; Todd S Horowitz; Serena J Butcher; Aline Bompas
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Visual background complexity facilitates the evolution of camouflage.

Authors:  Sami Merilaita
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  A diffusion model account of response time and accuracy in a brightness discrimination task: fitting real data and failing to fit fake but plausible data.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

7.  Natural Selection in Cepaea.

Authors:  A J Cain; P M Sheppard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1954-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  Frequency-dependent selection by predators.

Authors:  J A Allen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1988-07-06       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Search images: selective attention to specific visual features of prey.

Authors:  C M Langley
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1996-04

10.  Visual search and selection of natural stimuli in the pigeon: the attention threshold hypothesis.

Authors:  A B Bond
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1983-07
View more
  33 in total

1.  Why the leopard got its spots: relating pattern development to ecology in felids.

Authors:  William L Allen; Innes C Cuthill; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel; Roland Baddeley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Disruptive and cryptic coloration.

Authors:  John A Endler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Empirical tests of the role of disruptive coloration in reducing detectability.

Authors:  Stewart Fraser; Alison Callahan; Dana Klassen; Thomas N Sherratt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Imperfect camouflage: how to hide in a variable world?

Authors:  Anna Hughes; Eric Liggins; Martin Stevens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Colour polymorphism in owls is linked to light variability.

Authors:  Arianna Passarotto; Deseada Parejo; Vincenzo Penteriani; Jesús M Avilés
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  The adaptive analysis of visual cognition using genetic algorithms.

Authors:  Robert G Cook; Muhammad A J Qadri
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2013-09-02

7.  Background complexity and the detectability of camouflaged targets by birds and humans.

Authors:  Feng Xiao; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Camouflage effects of various colour-marking morphs against different microhabitat backgrounds in a polymorphic pygmy grasshopper Tetrix japonica.

Authors:  Kaori Tsurui; Atsushi Honma; Takayoshi Nishida
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Visual search and attention in blue jays (Cyanocitta cristata): Associative cuing and sequential priming.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Goto; Alan B Bond; Marianna Burks; Alan C Kamil
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.478

10.  Frequency-dependent selection by wild birds promotes polymorphism in model salamanders.

Authors:  Benjamin M Fitzpatrick; Kim Shook; Reuben Izally
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 2.964

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.