Literature DB >> 12894933

Visual background complexity facilitates the evolution of camouflage.

Sami Merilaita1.   

Abstract

Cryptic animal coloration or camouflage is an adaptation that decreases the risk of detection. The study of the evolution of camouflage has strongly emphasized the minimization of visual information that predators receive from prey, by means of background matching. However, the evolutionary effects of information processing after its reception have been virtually ignored. I constructed a model that employs an artificial neural network and simulates the evolution of prey coloration in a visually complex and simple habitat. The model suggests: (1) the difficulty of a detection task is related to the visual complexity of the habitat; (2) it is easier to decrease the risk of detection by the means of camouflage in a visually complex habitat; (3) selection on camouflage can exploit limitations in predators information processing; and (4) there are shortcomings in using the degree of background matching as the measure of camouflage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12894933     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00333.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  30 in total

1.  Aposematism and crypsis combined as a result of distance dependence: functional versatility of the colour pattern in the swallowtail butterfly larva.

Authors:  Birgitta S Tullberg; Sami Merilaita; Christer Wiklund
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Artificial neural networks and the study of evolution of prey coloration.

Authors:  Sami Merilaita
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  TDCS guided using fMRI significantly accelerates learning to identify concealed objects.

Authors:  Vincent P Clark; Brian A Coffman; Andy R Mayer; Michael P Weisend; Terran D R Lane; Vince D Calhoun; Elaine M Raybourn; Christopher M Garcia; Eric M Wassermann
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Background-matching and disruptive coloration, and the evolution of cryptic coloration.

Authors:  Sami Merilaita; Johan Lind
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Trade-off between warning signal efficacy and mating success in the wood tiger moth.

Authors:  Ossi Nokelainen; Robert H Hegna; Joanneke H Reudler; Carita Lindstedt; Johanna Mappes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Imperfect camouflage: how to hide in a variable world?

Authors:  Anna Hughes; Eric Liggins; Martin Stevens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  How camouflage works.

Authors:  Sami Merilaita; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Context-dependent crypsis: a prey's perspective of a color polymorphic predator.

Authors:  D Rodríguez-Morales; V Rico-Gray; J G García-Franco; H Ajuria-Ibarra; L T Hernández-Salazar; L E Robledo-Ospina; D Rao
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2018-05-12

9.  Background choice as an anti-predator strategy: the roles of background matching and visual complexity in the habitat choice of the least killifish.

Authors:  Karin Kjernsmo; Sami Merilaita
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Background complexity and the detectability of camouflaged targets by birds and humans.

Authors:  Feng Xiao; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.