Literature DB >> 16479111

First results after introduction of the four-armed da Vinci Surgical System in fully robotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Jeroen Heemskerk1, Ronald van Dam, Wim G van Gemert, Gerard L Beets, Jan Willem M Greve, Michael J H M Jacobs, Nicole D Bouvy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy offers less post-operative pain, less complications, and faster recovery compared with open cholecystectomy. However, laparoscopic surgery can be demanding because of several technical drawbacks. Robotic surgery allows dexterity skills to be performed faster and shortens the learning curve, possibly leading to faster and safer laparoscopic surgery.
METHODS: In this paper, we report the results of our first 12 cases of fully robotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the da Vinci Surgical System, comparing them with 12 cases of conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Using a fourth arm in robotic laparoscopy enables the surgeon to perform surgery without the use of a tableside assistant, leading to non-tiring, tremble-free assistance and reducing salary costs. Primary end points are operating time and costs. Secondary end points are operative complications and duration of admission.
RESULTS: Fully robotic cholecystectomy was completed in all 12 cases without increased complication rate and without conversions. However, robotic assistance results in an increased overall operating room stay of 31 min and increased costs of EUR 1,180.62.
CONCLUSION: Fully robotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and feasible but seems more expensive and time consuming at this moment. Copyright (c) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16479111     DOI: 10.1159/000091445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Surg        ISSN: 0253-4886            Impact factor:   2.588


  14 in total

Review 1.  Economic evaluation of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Giuseppe Turchetti; Ilaria Palla; Francesca Pierotti; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Caiwen Han; Xinyi Shan; Liang Yao; Peijing Yan; Meixuan Li; Lidong Hu; Hongwei Tian; Wutang Jing; Binbin Du; Lixia Wang; Kehu Yang; Tiankang Guo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  The role of surgical simulation and the learning curve in robot-assisted surgery.

Authors:  Reem Al Bareeq; Shiva Jayaraman; Bob Kiaii; Christopher Schlachta; John D Denstedt; Stephen E Pautler
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-03-29

4.  Getting started with robotics in general surgery with cholecystectomy: the Canadian experience.

Authors:  Shiva Jayaraman; Ward Davies; Christopher M Schlachta
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES) consensus statement on the use of robotics in general surgery.

Authors:  Amir Szold; Roberto Bergamaschi; Ivo Broeders; Jenny Dankelman; Antonello Forgione; Thomas Langø; Andreas Melzer; Yoav Mintz; Salvador Morales-Conde; Michael Rhodes; Richard Satava; Chung-Ngai Tang; Ramon Vilallonga
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Learning curve and robot set-up/operative times in singly docked totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Subhashini Ayloo; Eduardo Fernandes; Nabajit Choudhury
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Robot assistant versus human or another robot assistant in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Kumarakrishnan Samraj; Giuseppe Fusai; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-09-12

8.  Robotic cholecystectomy with new port sites.

Authors:  Ji Hun Kim; Nam Hyun Baek; Guangyl Li; Seung Hui Choi; In Ho Jeong; Jae Chul Hwang; Jin Hong Kim; Byung Moo Yoo; Wook Hwan Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Early experience with the da Vinci surgical system robot in gynecological surgery at King Abdulaziz University Hospital.

Authors:  Khalid H Sait
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2011-07-26

10.  Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic fundoplication: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  B P Müller-Stich; M A Reiter; M N Wente; V V Bintintan; J Köninger; M W Büchler; C N Gutt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 3.453

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.