Literature DB >> 21993935

Economic evaluation of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery: a systematic review.

Giuseppe Turchetti1, Ilaria Palla, Francesca Pierotti, Alfred Cuschieri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health technology assessment (HTA) is frequently used when a new and expensive technology is being introduced into clinical practice. This certainly is the case with the da Vinci surgical robot, with costs ranging from $1 to $2.5 million for each unit. This systematic review documents major variability in the reported cost evaluation studies of da Vinci robot-assisted operations compared with those performed by the direct manual laparoscopic approach.
METHODS: Published studies in the English language related to the period 2000-2010 were searched using economic and clinical electronic databases.
RESULTS: All 11 reports included some form of cost analysis, which made it possible for the authors to extract information on certain specific economic outcomes: operating room time, hospital stay, and total costs. With the exception of two studies, the reported operating room time was higher with the robotic approach than with manual laparoscopic surgery, and the hospital stay was the same for the two techniques. Robotic surgery is significantly more expensive if the purchase and maintenance costs of the robot system are included in the total costs. Only 3 of the 11 publications included these costs.
CONCLUSIONS: The disadvantage of robotic surgery is its higher costs related to purchase and maintenance of technology and its longer operating room time. However, emerging evidence shows that operating room time decreases with experience using the robot. From the HTA viewpoint, the result of this review is that the jury still is out on the HTA of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21993935     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1936-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  23 in total

1.  New technology and health care costs--the case of robot-assisted surgery.

Authors:  Gabriel I Barbash; Sherry A Glied
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Robotic vascular surgery, 150 cases.

Authors:  P Stádler; L Dvoracek; P Vitasek; P Matous
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.547

3.  Health technology assessment. Evaluation of biomedical innovative technologies.

Authors:  Giuseppe Turchetti; Enza Spadoni; Eliezer Elie Geisler
Journal:  IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag       Date:  2010 May-Jun

Review 4.  Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: Consensus on Health Economic Criteria.

Authors:  Silvia Evers; Mariëlle Goossens; Henrica de Vet; Maurits van Tulder; André Ament
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.188

5.  Cost comparison of robotic, video-assisted thoracic surgery and thoracotomy approaches to pulmonary lobectomy.

Authors:  Bernard J Park; Raja M Flores
Journal:  Thorac Surg Clin       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.750

6.  Outcomes of pancreatoduodenectomy with robotic surgery versus open surgery.

Authors:  Ning-xin Zhou; Jun-zhou Chen; Quanda Liu; Xiaodong Zhang; Zhifei Wang; Shiyan Ren; Xiong-fei Chen
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 2.547

7.  Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M Morino; G Benincà; G Giraudo; G M Del Genio; F Rebecchi; C Garrone
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.

Authors:  Dimitri Sarlos; Lavonne Kots; Nebojsa Stevanovic; Gabriel Schaer
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 2.435

9.  Technical feasibility of robot-sewn anastomosis in robotic surgery for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hoon Hur; June Young Kim; Yong Kwan Cho; Sang-Uk Han
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.878

10.  Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy.

Authors:  A L Rawlings; J H Woodland; R K Vegunta; D L Crawford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 3.453

View more
  49 in total

1.  Laparoscopic robot-assisted versus open total pancreatectomy: a case-matched study.

Authors:  Ugo Boggi; Simona Palladino; Gabriele Massimetti; Fabio Vistoli; Fabio Caniglia; Nelide De Lio; Vittorio Perrone; Linda Barbarello; Mario Belluomini; Stefano Signori; Gabriella Amorese; Franco Mosca
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Robotic surgery for rectal cancer can overcome difficulties associated with pelvic anatomy.

Authors:  Se Jin Baek; Chang Hee Kim; Min Soo Cho; Sung Uk Bae; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Seung Hyuk Baik; Kang Young Lee; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The first nationwide evaluation of robotic general surgery: a regionalized, small but safe start.

Authors:  Blair A Wormer; Kristian T Dacey; Kristopher B Williams; Joel F Bradley; Amanda L Walters; Vedra A Augenstein; Dimitrios Stefanidis; B Todd Heniford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic and robot-assisted major hepatectomies: an Italian multi-institutional comparative study.

Authors:  Marcello Giuseppe Spampinato; Andrea Coratti; Luigi Bianco; Fabio Caniglia; Andrea Laurenzi; Francesco Puleo; Giuseppe Maria Ettorre; Ugo Boggi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Robotic liver surgery.

Authors:  Universe Leung; Yuman Fong
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 6.  Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Kun Li; Jianan Zou; Jianxiong Tang; Jianzhong Di; Xiaodong Han; Pin Zhang
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  The cost of robotics: an analysis of the added costs of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery using the National Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Zhamak Khorgami; Wei T Li; Theresa N Jackson; C Anthony Howard; Guido M Sclabas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Cost comparison of open approach, transoral laser microsurgery and transoral robotic surgery for partial and total laryngectomies.

Authors:  Manon Dombrée; Ralph Crott; Georges Lawson; Pascal Janne; Annick Castiaux; Bruno Krug
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer in a single surgeon's experience: a cost analysis covering the initial 50 robotic cases with the da Vinci Si.

Authors:  Luca Morelli; Simone Guadagni; Valentina Lorenzoni; Gregorio Di Franco; Luigi Cobuccio; Matteo Palmeri; Giovanni Caprili; Cristiano D'Isidoro; Andrea Moglia; Vincenzo Ferrari; Giulio Di Candio; Franco Mosca; Giuseppe Turchetti
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-07-31       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Robotic surgery trends in general surgical oncology from the National Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Camille L Stewart; Philip H G Ituarte; Kurt A Melstrom; Susanne G Warner; Laleh G Melstrom; Lily L Lai; Yuman Fong; Yanghee Woo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.