Literature DB >> 23716987

Robotic cholecystectomy with new port sites.

Ji Hun Kim1, Nam Hyun Baek, Guangyl Li, Seung Hui Choi, In Ho Jeong, Jae Chul Hwang, Jin Hong Kim, Byung Moo Yoo, Wook Hwan Kim.   

Abstract

AIM: To introduce robotic cholecystectomy (RC) using new port sites on the low abdominal area.
METHODS: From June 2010 to June 2011, a total of 178 RCs were performed at Ajou University Medical Center. We prospectively collected the set-up time (working time and docking time) and console time in all robotic procedures.
RESULTS: Eighty-three patients were male and 95 female; the age ranged from 18 to 72 years of age (mean 54.6 ± 15.0 years). All robotic procedures were successfully completed. The mean operation time was 52.4 ± 17.1 min. The set-up time and console time were 11.9 ± 5.4 min (5-43 min) and 15.1 ± 8.0 min (4-50 min), respectively. The conversion rate to laparoscopic or open procedures was zero. The complication rate was 0.6% (n = 1, bleeding). There was no bile duct injury or mortality. The mean hospital stay was 1.4 ± 1.1 d. There was a significant correlation between the console time and white blood cell count (r = 0.033, P = 0.015). In addition, the higher the white blood cell count (more than 10000), the longer the console time.
CONCLUSION: Robotic cholecystectomy using new port sites on the low abdominal area can be safely and efficiently performed, with sufficient patient satisfaction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal area; Gallbladder disease; Operation time; Port sites; Robotic cholecystectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23716987      PMCID: PMC3662947          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i20.3077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  29 in total

1.  What is the value of telerobotic technology in gastrointestinal surgery?

Authors:  A Perez; M J Zinner; S W Ashley; D C Brooks; E E Whang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-01-18       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems.

Authors:  G F Dakin; M Gagner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-02-17       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study.

Authors:  D Nio; W A Bemelman; O R C Busch; B C Vrouenraets; D J Gouma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Robotic surgery: a current perspective.

Authors:  Anthony R Lanfranco; Andres E Castellanos; Jaydev P Desai; William C Meyers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Stereoscopic vision provides a significant advantage for precision robotic laparoscopy.

Authors:  I C Jourdan; E Dutson; A Garcia; T Vleugels; J Leroy; D Mutter; J Marescaux
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 6.  An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S M Strasberg; M Hertl; N J Soper
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  A prospective analysis of 211 robotic-assisted surgical procedures.

Authors:  M A Talamini; S Chapman; S Horgan; W S Melvin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial Mayo Clinic Scottsdale experience.

Authors:  David W Miller; Richard T Schlinkert; Denise K Schlinkert
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  DaVinci robotic-assisted laparoscopic bariatric surgery: is it justified in a routine setting?

Authors:  Gilbert Mühlmann; Alexander Klaus; Werner Kirchmayr; Heinz Wykypiel; Andreas Unger; Elisabeth Höller; Hermann Nehoda; Franz Aigner; Helmut G Weiss
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 10.  Trocar site hernia.

Authors:  Hitoshi Tonouchi; Yukinari Ohmori; Minako Kobayashi; Masato Kusunoki
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2004-11
View more
  2 in total

1.  Cholecystectomy using the Revo-i robotic surgical system from Korea: the first clinical study.

Authors:  Jin Hong Lim; Woo Jung Lee; Seung Ho Choi; Chang Moo Kang
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-09-16

2.  Pain related to robotic cholecystectomy with lower abdominal ports: effect of the bilateral ultrasound-guided split injection technique of rectus sheath block in female patients: A prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  Jin Soo Kim; Jong Bum Choi; Sook Young Lee; Wook Hwan Kim; Nam Hyun Baek; Jayoun Kim; Chu Kyung Park; Yeon Ju Lee; Sung Yong Park
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.