Literature DB >> 16472038

A heuristics approach to understanding cancer risk perception: contributions from judgment and decision-making research.

Ellen Peters1, Kevin D McCaul, Michael Stefanek, Wendy Nelson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The likelihood judgments that people make about their risks for cancer have important implications. At the individual level, risk estimates guide protective actions, such as cancer screening. However, at the extremes, exaggerated risk judgments can also lead to anxiety that degrades quality of life or to aggressive self-protective actions that are unwarranted given the objective risks. At the policy level, risk judgments may serve as an indicator of societal perceptions of the "war" against cancer. Using risk judgments, the public expresses its belief about whether we are winning.
PURPOSE: We present theoretical perspectives from judgment and decision making, illustrate how they can explain some of the existing empirical findings in the cancer risk literature, and describe additional predictions that have not yet been tested.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, we suggest that theories from the judgment and decision-making perspective offer a potentially powerful view for understanding and improving risk judgments for cancer and other diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16472038     DOI: 10.1207/s15324796abm3101_8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Behav Med        ISSN: 0883-6612


  30 in total

1.  Reduced fatalism and increased prevention behavior after two high-profile lung cancer events.

Authors:  David B Portnoy; Corinne R Leach; Annette R Kaufman; Richard P Moser; Catherine M Alfano
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2013-11-25

2.  Risk perception and preference for prevention of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Sukyung Chung; Kala Mehta; Martha Shumway; Jennifer Alvidrez; Eliseo J Perez-Stable
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 5.725

3.  Examining Intuitive Cancer Risk Perceptions in Haitian-Creole and Spanish-Speaking Populations.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hay; Debra Brennessel; M Margaret Kemeny; Erica I Lubetkin
Journal:  J Transcult Nurs       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 1.959

Review 4.  Decision making and cancer.

Authors:  Valerie F Reyna; Wendy L Nelson; Paul K Han; Michael P Pignone
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2015 Feb-Mar

5.  Understanding Genetic Breast Cancer Risk: Processing Loci of the BRCA Gist Intelligent Tutoring System.

Authors:  Christopher R Wolfe; Valerie F Reyna; Colin L Widmer; Elizabeth M Cedillos-Whynott; Priscila G Brust-Renck; Audrey M Weil; Xiangen Hu
Journal:  Learn Individ Differ       Date:  2016-07-01

6.  Don't know responses to cognitive and affective risk perception measures: Exploring prevalence and socio-demographic moderators.

Authors:  Eva Janssen; Philippe Verduyn; Erika A Waters
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2018-02-02

7.  Deliberative and intuitive risk perceptions as predictors of colorectal cancer screening over time.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hay; Marcel Ramos; Yuelin Li; Susan Holland; Debra Brennessel; M Margaret Kemeny
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-08-18

8.  Examining intuitive risk perceptions for cancer in diverse populations.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hay; Raymond Baser; Neil D Weinstein; Yuelin Li; Louis Primavera; M Margaret Kemeny
Journal:  Health Risk Soc       Date:  2014-01-01

9.  Management of chronic hypertension in older men: an exploration of patient goal-setting.

Authors:  Vanessa A Brown; L Kay Bartholomew; Aanand D Naik
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2007-09-24

10.  Breast cancer anxiety's associations with responses to a chemoprevention decision aid.

Authors:  Amanda J Dillard; Laura Scherer; Peter A Ubel; Dylan M Smith; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Jennifer B McClure; Sarah Greene; Azadeh Stark; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 4.634

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.