Literature DB >> 28008216

Understanding Genetic Breast Cancer Risk: Processing Loci of the BRCA Gist Intelligent Tutoring System.

Christopher R Wolfe1, Valerie F Reyna2, Colin L Widmer1, Elizabeth M Cedillos-Whynott1, Priscila G Brust-Renck2, Audrey M Weil1, Xiangen Hu3.   

Abstract

The BRCA Gist Intelligent Tutoring System helps women understand and make decisions about genetic testing for breast cancer risk. BRCA Gist is guided by Fuzzy-Trace Theory, (FTT) and built using AutoTutor Lite. It responds differently to participants depending on what they say. Seven tutorial dialogues requiring explanation and argumentation are guided by three FTT concepts: forming gist explanations in one's own words, emphasizing decision-relevant information, and deliberating the consequences of decision alternatives. Participants were randomly assigned to BRCA Gist, a control, or impoverished BRCA Gist conditions removing gist explanation dialogues, argumentation dialogues, or FTT images. All BRCA Gist conditions performed significantly better than controls on knowledge, comprehension, and risk assessment. Significant differences in knowledge, comprehension, and fine-grained dialogue analyses demonstrate the efficacy of gist explanation dialogues. FTT images significantly increased knowledge. Providing more elements in arguments against testing correlated with increased knowledge and comprehension.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast Cancer; Fuzzy-Trace Theory; Genetic Testing; Intelligent Tutoring System; Medical Decision-Making

Year:  2016        PMID: 28008216      PMCID: PMC5166605          DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2016.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Individ Differ        ISSN: 1041-6080


  33 in total

Review 1.  Assessing the risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  K Armstrong; A Eisen; B Weber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-02-24       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Genetic testing and medical decision making.

Authors:  V F Reyna; F J Lloyd; P Whalen
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2001-11-12

3.  When are tutorial dialogues more effective than reading?

Authors:  Kurt Vanlehn; Arthur C Graesser; G Tanner Jackson; Pamela Jordan; Andrew Olney; Carolyn P Rosé
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-02

4.  Learning, thinking, and emoting with discourse technologies.

Authors:  Arthur C Graesser
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2011-11

5.  Interprofessional education about shared decision making for patients in primary care settings.

Authors:  Nananda Col; Laura Bozzuto; Pia Kirkegaard; Marije Koelewijn-van Loon; Habeeb Majeed; Chirk Jen Ng; Valeria Pacheco-Huergo
Journal:  J Interprof Care       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.338

6.  BRCA mutation frequency and penetrance: new data, old debate.

Authors:  Kenneth Offit
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  A heuristics approach to understanding cancer risk perception: contributions from judgment and decision-making research.

Authors:  Ellen Peters; Kevin D McCaul; Michael Stefanek; Wendy Nelson
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2006-02

8.  Theories of medical decision making and health: an evidence-based approach.

Authors:  Valerie F Reyna
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Explaining contradictory relations between risk perception and risk taking.

Authors:  Britain Mills; Valerie F Reyna; Steven Estrada
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-05

Review 10.  Online patient education and risk assessment: project OPERA from Cancerbackup. Putting inherited breast cancer risk information into context using argumentation theory.

Authors:  James Mackay; Peter Schulz; Sara Rubinelli; Andrea Pithers
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2007-06-21
View more
  7 in total

1.  The effectiveness of argumentation in tutorial dialogues with an Intelligent Tutoring System for genetic risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Cedillos-Whynott; Christopher R Wolfe; Colin L Widmer; Priscila G Brust-Renck; Audrey Weil; Valerie F Reyna
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2016-09

2.  Active engagement in a web-based tutorial to prevent obesity grounded in Fuzzy-Trace Theory predicts higher knowledge and gist comprehension.

Authors:  Priscila G Brust-Renck; Valerie F Reyna; Evan A Wilhelms; Christopher R Wolfe; Colin L Widmer; Elizabeth M Cedillos-Whynott; A Kate Morant
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2017-08

Review 3.  Artificial Intelligence for Health Professions Educators.

Authors:  Kimberly Lomis; Pamela Jeffries; Anthony Palatta; Melanie Sage; Javaid Sheikh; Carl Sheperis; Alison Whelan
Journal:  NAM Perspect       Date:  2021-09-08

4.  Adapting a Theoretically-Based intervention for underserved clinical populations at increased risk for hereditary Cancer: Lessons learned from the BRCA-Gist experience.

Authors:  Alejandra Hurtado-de-Mendoza; Valerie F Reyna; Christopher R Wolfe; Sara Gómez-Trillos; Arnethea L Sutton; Ashleigh Brennan; Vanessa B Sheppard
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-07-05

5.  Viruses, Vaccines, and COVID-19: Explaining and Improving Risky Decision-making.

Authors:  Valerie F Reyna; David A Broniatowski; Sarah M Edelson
Journal:  J Appl Res Mem Cogn       Date:  2021-12-13

6.  Fuzzy-Trace Theory and the Battle for the Gist in the Public Mind.

Authors:  Christopher R Wolfe
Journal:  J Appl Res Mem Cogn       Date:  2021-12-13

7.  Enhancing Patient Understanding of Medication Risks and Benefits.

Authors:  Susan J Blalock; Elizabeth B Solow; Valerie F Reyna; Molly Keebler; Delesha Carpenter; Caprice Hunt; Genevieve Hickey; Jeffrey R Curtis; Kimberlee O'Neill; Sandra Bond Chapman
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 5.178

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.