Literature DB >> 25730718

Decision making and cancer.

Valerie F Reyna1, Wendy L Nelson2, Paul K Han3, Michael P Pignone4.   

Abstract

We review decision making along the cancer continuum in the contemporary context of informed and shared decision making in which patients are encouraged to take a more active role in their health care. We discuss challenges to achieving informed and shared decision making, including cognitive limitations and emotional factors, but argue that understanding the mechanisms of decision making offers hope for improving decision support. Theoretical approaches to decision making that explain cognition, emotion, and their interaction are described, including classical psychophysical approaches, dual-process approaches that focus on conflicts between emotion versus cognition (or reason), and modern integrative approaches such as fuzzy-trace theory. In contrast to the earlier emphasis on rote use of numerical detail, modern approaches emphasize understanding the bottom-line gist of options (which encompasses emotion and other influences on meaning) and retrieving relevant social and moral values to apply to those gist representations. Finally, research on interventions to support better decision making in clinical settings is reviewed, drawing out implications for future research on decision making and cancer. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25730718      PMCID: PMC4347999          DOI: 10.1037/a0036834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Psychol        ISSN: 0003-066X


  89 in total

Review 1.  Heuristic decision making.

Authors:  Gerd Gigerenzer; Wolfgang Gaissmaier
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 2.  A heuristics approach to understanding cancer risk perception: contributions from judgment and decision-making research.

Authors:  Ellen Peters; Kevin D McCaul; Michael Stefanek; Wendy Nelson
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2006-02

3.  Bringing meaning to numbers: the impact of evaluative categories on decisions.

Authors:  Ellen Peters; Nathan F Dieckmann; Daniel Västfjäll; C K Mertz; Paul Slovic; Judith H Hibbard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2009-09

4.  Context and the interpretation of likelihood information: the role of intergroup comparisons on perceived vulnerability.

Authors:  Paul D Windschitl; René Martin; Annette R Flugstad
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2002-05

5.  A web exercise in evidence-based medicine using cognitive theory.

Authors:  F J Lloyd; V F Reyna
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Active surveillance program for prostate cancer: an update of the Johns Hopkins experience.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; Bruce J Trock; Patricia Landis; Zhaoyong Feng; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin; Patrick C Walsh; H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.

Authors:  Dawn Stacey; Carol L Bennett; Michael J Barry; Nananda F Col; Karen B Eden; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; Anne Lyddiatt; France Légaré; Richard Thomson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-10-05

8.  Communicating treatment risk reduction to people with low numeracy skills: a cross-cultural comparison.

Authors:  Rocio Garcia-Retamero; Mirta Galesic
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Are patients getting the "gist" in risk communication? Patient understanding of prognosis in breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  David W Hutton; Jeffrey K Belkora; Ross D Shachter; Dan H Moore
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  Dual equipoise shared decision making: definitions for decision and behaviour support interventions.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Dominick Frosch; Stephen Rollnick
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 7.327

View more
  59 in total

1.  Affective forecasting and medication decision making in breast-cancer prevention.

Authors:  Michael Hoerger; Laura D Scherer; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.267

2.  Not the last word: dissemination strategies for patient-centred research in nursing.

Authors:  Teresa L Hagan; Karen Schmidt; Guyanna R Ackison; Megan Murphy; Jennifer R Jones
Journal:  J Res Nurs       Date:  2017-06-26

3.  Dread sensitivity in decisions about real and imagined electrical shocks does not vary by age.

Authors:  Corinna E Löckenhoff; Joshua L Rutt; Gregory R Samanez-Larkin; Ted O'Donoghue; Valerie F Reyna; Barbara Ganzel
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2016-12

4.  Incongruence in treatment decision making is associated with lower health-related quality of life among prostate cancer survivors: results from the PiCTure study.

Authors:  Frances J Drummond; Anna T Gavin; Linda Sharp
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  What Is a "Good" Treatment Decision? Decisional Control, Knowledge, Treatment Decision Making, and Quality of Life in Men with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Heather Orom; Caitlin Biddle; Willie Underwood; Christian J Nelson; D Lynn Homish
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Communicating Numerical Risk: Human Factors That Aid Understanding in Health Care.

Authors:  Priscila G Brust-Renck; Caisa E Royer; Valerie F Reyna
Journal:  Rev Hum Factors Ergon       Date:  2013-10

7.  Using a Non-Fit Message Helps to De-Intensify Negative Reactions to Tough Advice.

Authors:  Ilona Fridman; Karen A Scherr; Paul A Glare; E Tory Higgins
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2016-08

8.  Social Determinants and Health Behaviors: Conceptual Frames and Empirical Advances.

Authors:  Susan E Short; Stefanie Mollborn
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2015-10

9.  Decision Aids: The Effect of Labeling Options on Patient Choices and Decision Making.

Authors:  James G Dolan; Olena A Cherkasky; Nancy Chin; Peter J Veazie
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Emotional Distress Increases the Likelihood of Undergoing Surgery among Men with Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Heather Orom; Willie Underwood; Caitlin Biddle
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.