OBJECTIVES: To understand how older adults perceive their risk of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and how this may shape their medical care decisions, we examined whether presence of established risk factors of AD is associated with individuals' perceived risk of AD, and with preference for preventing AD. PARTICIPANTS: Data came from the US Health and Retirement Study participants who were asked questions on AD risk perception (N = 778). MEASUREMENTS: Perceived risk of AD was measured by respondents' estimate of their percent chance (0-100) developing AD in the next 10 years. Preference for AD prevention was measured with questions eliciting willingness to pay for a drug to prevent AD. ANALYSIS: Multivariate linear regressions were used to estimate correlates of perceived risk and preference for prevention. RESULTS: Better cognitive functioning and physical activity are associated with decreased perceived risk. Neither age nor cardiovascular disease is associated with perceived risk. African Americans have lower perceived risk than non-Latino whites; the difference is wider among people age 65 and above. Only 4% to 7% of the variation in perceived risk was explained by the model. Preference for prevention is stronger with increased perceived risk, but not with the presence of risk factors. Persons with better cognitive functioning, physical functioning, or wealth status have a stronger preference for prevention. CONCLUSION: Some known risk factors appear to inform, but only modestly, individuals' perceived risk of AD. Furthermore, decisions about AD prevention may not be determined by objective needs alone, suggesting a potential discrepancy between need and demand for AD preventive care.
OBJECTIVES: To understand how older adults perceive their risk of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and how this may shape their medical care decisions, we examined whether presence of established risk factors of AD is associated with individuals' perceived risk of AD, and with preference for preventing AD. PARTICIPANTS: Data came from the US Health and Retirement Study participants who were asked questions on AD risk perception (N = 778). MEASUREMENTS: Perceived risk of AD was measured by respondents' estimate of their percent chance (0-100) developing AD in the next 10 years. Preference for AD prevention was measured with questions eliciting willingness to pay for a drug to prevent AD. ANALYSIS: Multivariate linear regressions were used to estimate correlates of perceived risk and preference for prevention. RESULTS: Better cognitive functioning and physical activity are associated with decreased perceived risk. Neither age nor cardiovascular disease is associated with perceived risk. African Americans have lower perceived risk than non-Latino whites; the difference is wider among peopleage 65 and above. Only 4% to 7% of the variation in perceived risk was explained by the model. Preference for prevention is stronger with increased perceived risk, but not with the presence of risk factors. Persons with better cognitive functioning, physical functioning, or wealth status have a stronger preference for prevention. CONCLUSION: Some known risk factors appear to inform, but only modestly, individuals' perceived risk of AD. Furthermore, decisions about AD prevention may not be determined by objective needs alone, suggesting a potential discrepancy between need and demand for AD preventive care.
Authors: F Reed Johnson; Ranjani Manjunath; Carol A Mansfield; Laurel J Clayton; Thomas J Hoerger; Ping Zhang Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Jennifer Weuve; Jae Hee Kang; JoAnn E Manson; Monique M B Breteler; James H Ware; Francine Grodstein Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-09-22 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: G G Fillenbaum; A Heyman; M S Huber; M A Woodbury; J Leiss; K E Schmader; A Bohannon; B Trapp-Moen Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 1998-07 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Jennifer L Etnier; Jeffrey D Labban; William B Karper; Laurie Wideman; Aaron T Piepmeier; Chia-Hao Shih; Michael Castellano; Lauren M Williams; Se-Yun Park; Vincent C Henrich; William N Dudley; Kelli L Rulison Journal: J Aging Phys Act Date: 2015-01-16 Impact factor: 1.961
Authors: Diane R Koeller; Wendy R Uhlmann; Deanna Alexis Carere; Robert C Green; J Scott Roberts Journal: J Genet Couns Date: 2017-05-16 Impact factor: 2.537