Literature DB >> 15266210

Genetic information leaflets: influencing attitudes towards genetic testing.

Susan Michie1, Elena di Lorenzo, Ruth Lane, Kevin Armstrong, Saskia Sanderson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This article explores how a "neutral" genetics information leaflet influenced people's attitudes to be more positive toward predictive genetic testing. This is of concern, given the desire within clinical genetics and population based testing to provide information that informs choice without directing toward, or against, testing.
METHOD: Four studies are reported. The first two investigated presentation (glossy and colored vs. black and white), and method of reading (read only vs. read followed by probing questions). The second two investigated content, using "think aloud," "card sort," and delayed recall tasks.
RESULTS: Those receiving a glossy leaflet expressed more positive attitudes and more interest in undergoing testing than those receiving a black and white leaflet, and those who were asked questions about what they had read were more positive about genetic testing than those who only read the leaflet. Recall one week later varied from 72% to 28%, depending on type of information. Information that described the advantages of genetic testing or discussed genes and genetic testing in relation to disease were well recalled and rated positively. Attitudes toward information ranged from 100% positive (e.g., what diseases genetic tests are available for) to 0% positive (e.g., the meaning of a positive result).
CONCLUSION: These results show that quite small changes within a leaflet can change attitudes toward genetic testing. This is of concern, given the association between attitudes toward a behavior and undergoing that behavior. The form, method of presentation, and content of genetic information leaflets should be evaluated for impact on attitude and decisions before they are used clinically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15266210     DOI: 10.1097/01.gim.0000132685.60259.ea

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  7 in total

1.  Reporting genetic results in research studies: summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group.

Authors:  Ebony B Bookman; Aleisha A Langehorne; John H Eckfeldt; Kathleen C Glass; Gail P Jarvik; Michael Klag; Greg Koski; Arno Motulsky; Benjamin Wilfond; Teri A Manolio; Richard R Fabsitz; Russell V Luepker
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 2.802

2.  Attitudes Toward Genetics and Genetic Testing Among Participants in the Jackson and Framingham Heart Studies.

Authors:  Katherine W Saylor; Lynette Ekunwe; Donna Antoine-LaVigne; Deborah E Sellers; Sarah McGraw; Daniel Levy; Greta Lee Splansky; Steven Joffe
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  The importance of written information packages in support of case-finding within families at risk for inherited high cholesterol.

Authors:  Hélène W P van den Nieuwenhoff; Ilse Mesters; Joyce J T M Nellissen; Anton F Stalenhoef; Nanne K de Vries
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  A controlled trial of the knowledge impact of tuberculosis information leaflets among staff supporting substance misusers: pilot study.

Authors:  Anjana Roy; Ibrahim Abubakar; Ann Chapman; Nick Andrews; Mike Pattinson; Marc Lipman; Laura C Rodrigues; Jose Figueroa; Surinder Tamne; Mike Catchpole
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Balancing obligations: should written information about life-sustaining treatment be neutral?

Authors:  Vicki Xafis; Dominic Wilkinson; Lynn Gillam; Jane Sullivan
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Oncologists' and cancer patients' views on whole-exome sequencing and incidental findings: results from the CanSeq study.

Authors:  Stacy W Gray; Elyse R Park; Julie Najita; Yolanda Martins; Lara Traeger; Elizabeth Bair; Joshua Gagne; Judy Garber; Pasi A Jänne; Neal Lindeman; Carol Lowenstein; Nelly Oliver; Lynette Sholl; Eliezer M Van Allen; Nikhil Wagle; Sam Wood; Levi Garraway; Steven Joffe
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Investigating the knowledge of and public attitudes towards genetic testing within the Visegrad countries: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Klára Bíró; Viktor Dombrádi; Zita Fekete; Gábor Bányai; Klára Boruzs; Attila Nagy; Róza Ádány
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 3.295

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.