Literature DB >> 16435114

MSCT is better than stress perfusion imaging for detecting CAD--For.

Filippo Cademartiri1, Jeroen J Bax.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2006        PMID： 16435114     DOI： 10.1007/s00259-005-1982-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN： 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


× No keyword cloud information.
  14 in total

1.  Prognostic value of cardiac risk factors and coronary artery calcium screening for all-cause mortality.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Paolo Raggi; Enrique Schisterman; Daniel S Berman; Tracy Q Callister
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Image reconstruction and image quality evaluation for a 64-slice CT scanner with z-flying focal spot.

Authors:  T G Flohr; K Stierstorfer; S Ulzheimer; H Bruder; A N Primak; C H McCollough
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Multislice CT coronary angiography: how to do it and what is the current clinical performance?

Authors:  Filippo Cademartiri; Joanne D Schuijf; Nico R Mollet; Patrizia Malagutti; Giuseppe Runza; Jeroen J Bax; Pim J de Feyter
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Global and regional left ventricular function assessment with 16-detector row CT: comparison with echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Liesbeth P Salm; Joanne D Schuijf; Albert de Roos; Hildo J Lamb; Hubert W Vliegen; J Wouter Jukema; Raoul Joemai; Ernst E van der Wall; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr       Date:  2005-08-10

5.  Assessment of myocardial viability in reperfused acute myocardial infarction using 16-slice computed tomography in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Andreas H Mahnken; Ralf Koos; Marcus Katoh; Joachim E Wildberger; Elmar Spuentrup; Arno Buecker; Rolf W Günther; Harald P Kühl
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography.

Authors:  Nico R Mollet; Filippo Cademartiri; Carlos A G van Mieghem; Giuseppe Runza; Eugène P McFadden; Timo Baks; Patrick W Serruys; Gabriel P Krestin; Pim J de Feyter
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Noninvasive detection and evaluation of atherosclerotic coronary plaques with multislice computed tomography.

Authors:  S Schroeder; A F Kopp; A Baumbach; C Meisner; A Kuettner; C Georg; B Ohnesorge; C Herdeg; C D Claussen; K R Karsch
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography.

Authors:  Gilbert L Raff; Michael J Gallagher; William W O'Neill; James A Goldstein
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 9.  [Electron beam computed tomography as a method to study coronary atherosclerosis].

Authors:  Paolo Raggi
Journal:  Ital Heart J Suppl       Date:  2002-12

10.  The prevalence of coronary artery calcium among diabetic individuals without known coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Julie Anne Hoff; Lauretta Quinn; Alexander Sevrukov; Rebecca B Lipton; Martha Daviglus; Daniel B Garside; Niraj K Ajmere; Sanjay Gandhi; George T Kondos
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-03-19       Impact factor: 24.094
View more
  1 in total

1.  Stress-ECG vs. CT coronary angiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a "real-world" experience.

Authors:  E Maffei; A Palumbo; C Martini; A Cuttone; F Ugo; E Emiliano; A Menozzi; L Vignali; V Brambilla; P Coruzzi; A Weustink; N Mollet; D Ardissino; C Reverberi; G Crisi; F Cademartiri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 3.469
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.