Literature DB >> 11300457

Noninvasive detection and evaluation of atherosclerotic coronary plaques with multislice computed tomography.

S Schroeder1, A F Kopp, A Baumbach, C Meisner, A Kuettner, C Georg, B Ohnesorge, C Herdeg, C D Claussen, K R Karsch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy in determining coronary lesion configuration by multislice computed tomography (MSCT). The results were compared with the findings of intracoronary ultrasound (ICUS).
BACKGROUND: The risk of acute coronary syndromes caused by plaque disruption and thrombosis depends on plaque composition rather than stenosis severity. Thus, the reliable noninvasive assessment of plaque configuration would constitute an important step forward for risk stratification in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Just recently, MSCT scanners became available for general purpose scanning. Due to improved spatial and temporal resolution, this new technology holds promise to allow for differentiation of coronary lesion configuration.
METHODS: The ICUS and MSCT scans (Somatom Volume Zoom, Siemens, Forchheim, Germany) were performed in 15 patients. Plaque composition was analyzed according to ICUS (plaque echogenity: soft, intermediate, calcified) and MSCT criteria (plaque density expressed by Hounsfield units [HU]).
RESULTS: Thirty-four plaques were analyzed. With ICUS, the plaques were classified as soft (n = 12), intermediate (n = 5) and calcified (n = 17). Using MSCT, soft plaques had a density of 14 +/- 26 HU (range -42 to +47 HU), intermediate plaques of 91 +/- 21 HU (61 to 112 HU) and calcified plaques of 419 +/- 194 HU (126 to 736 HU). Nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test revealed a significant difference of plaque density among the three groups (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that coronary lesion configuration might be correctly differentiated by MSCT. Since also rupture-prone soft plaques can be detected by MSCT, this noninvasive method might become an important diagnostic tool for risk stratification in the near future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11300457     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01115-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  153 in total

1.  New coronary imaging techniques: what to expect?

Authors:  P J de Feyter; K Nieman
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  The role of 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography in the detection of subclinical atherosclerosis of the coronary artery.

Authors:  Hae Chang Jeong; Youngkeun Ahn; Jum Suk Ko; Min Goo Lee; Doo Sun Sim; Keun Ho Park; Nam Sik Yoon; Hyun Ju Youn; Young Joon Hong; Kye Hun Kim; Hyung Wook Park; Ju Han Kim; Yun-Hyeon Kim; Myung Ho Jeong; Jeong Gwan Cho; Jong Chun Park; Jung Chaee Kang
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Assessment of atherosclerotic plaques in a rabbit model by delayed-phase contrast-enhanced CT angiography: comparison with histopathology.

Authors:  Jin Hur; Young Jin Kim; Hyo Sup Shim; Hye-Jeong Lee; Ji Eun Nam; Kyu Ok Choe; Byoung Wook Choi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Non-invasive coronary imaging: computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging?

Authors:  C R Peebles
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  Coronary arterial remodeling: from bench to bedside.

Authors:  Paul Schoenhagen; Steven E Nissen; E Murat Tuzcu
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.113

6.  ECG-gated multislice spiral computed tomography to clarify lesion severity in a case of left main stenosis. Multislice spiral computed tomography to clarify lesion severity.

Authors:  Ralf Koos; Andreas Horst Mahnken; Anil-Martin Sinha; Joachim Ernst Wildberger; Rainer Hoffmann
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  [Indications for multislice CT angiography of coronary arteries].

Authors:  C Rist; K Nikolaou; B J Wintersperger; G Bastarrika; M F Reiser; C R Becker
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 8.  Integrated imaging of cardiac anatomy, physiology, and viability.

Authors:  James A Arrighi
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Coronary plaque quantification by voxel analysis: dual-source MDCT angiography versus intravascular sonography.

Authors:  Harald Brodoefel; Christof Burgstahler; Adeel Sabir; Chun-Shan Yam; Faisal Khosa; Claus D Claussen; Melvin E Clouse
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Increased coronary atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability by coronary computed tomography angiography in HIV-infected men.

Authors:  Markella V Zanni; Suhny Abbara; Janet Lo; Bryan Wai; David Hark; Eleni Marmarelis; Steven K Grinspoon
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 4.177

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.