Literature DB >> 16434187

Risk-reducing surgery in women with familial susceptibility for breast and/or ovarian cancer.

Yoland Antill1, John Reynolds, Mary-Anne Young, Judy Kirk, Katherine Tucker, Tarli Bogtstra, Shirley Wong, Tracy Dudding, Juliana Di Iulio, Kelly-Anne Phillips.   

Abstract

This multicentre study examined uptake of bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy (BRRM) and bilateral risk-reducing oophorectomy (BRRO) in women at increased risk for breast and/or ovarian cancer who had attended a familial cancer clinic (FCC) between January 1999 and June 2000. Eligible women (N=396), were mailed a questionnaire assessing: BRRM and BRRO details; risk perception; and anxiety. Family history, genetic testing and risk assessment were abstracted from medical records. Surgery was cross-tabulated with demographics, risk perception and anxiety with either Fisher's exact test or the exact form of the Mantel-Haenszel test (for ordinal factors) used to investigate for associations. Ordinal logistic regression was used with continuous-scale covariates. In total, 130 women were lost to follow-up leaving 266; of these 182 (68.4%) responded. Mean follow-up time was 3.73 years. The BRRM rate was 4.4%; with no difference found between moderate and high-risk groups. BRRM was associated with increasing numbers of affected relatives (P=0.025). BRRO was undertaken by 17.3%, more commonly in women older than 40 years of age (P=0.023) and with a BRCA1/2 mutation (P=0.017). Women who underwent BRRM (P=0.052) or BRRO (P<0.001) had a lower post-procedure risk perception than those who did not. During the timeframe of this study, risk-reducing surgery was undertaken by a small percentage of Australian women at increased risk for breast and/or ovarian cancer who attended FCCs. Family cancer history and mutation status were associated with uptake.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16434187     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.11.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  14 in total

Review 1.  Predictors of choosing life-long screening or prophylactic surgery in women at high and moderate risk for breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  J R J De Leeuw; M J van Vliet; M G E M Ausems
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  The consequences of risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: the case for a coordinated approach to long-term follow up post surgical menopause.

Authors:  Carmel Pezaro; Paul James; Joanne McKinley; Mary Shanahan; Mary-Anne Young; Gillian Mitchell
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Preserving the self: the process of decision making about hereditary breast cancer and ovarian cancer risk reduction.

Authors:  A Fuchsia Howard; Lynda G Balneaves; Joan L Bottorff; Patricia Rodney
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2010-10-27

4.  Long-term outcomes of BRCA1/BRCA2 testing: risk reduction and surveillance.

Authors:  Marc D Schwartz; Claudine Isaacs; Kristi D Graves; Elizabeth Poggi; Beth N Peshkin; Christy Gell; Clinton Finch; Scott Kelly; Kathryn L Taylor; Lauren Perley
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Catalysts to withdrawal from familial ovarian cancer screening for surgery and reactions to discontinued screening: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Kate J Lifford; Alison Clements; Lindsay Fraser; Deborah Lancastle; Kate Brain
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 6.  New strategies in ovarian cancer: uptake and experience of women at high risk of ovarian cancer who are considering risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.

Authors:  Suzanne M Miller; Pagona Roussi; Mary B Daly; John Scarpato
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  The process of deciding about prophylactic surgery for breast and ovarian cancer: Patient questions, uncertainties, and communication.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman; Wendy Chung
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.802

8.  Psychosocial factors and uptake of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women at high risk for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Bettina Meiser; Melanie A Price; Phyllis N Butow; Janan Karatas; Judy Wilson; Louise Heiniger; Brandi Baylock; Margaret Charles; Sue-Anne McLachlan; Kelly-Anne Phillips
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Patient compliance based on genetic medicine: a literature review.

Authors:  Kai Insa Schneider; Jörg Schmidtke
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-08-10

Review 10.  Women's decision making about risk-reducing strategies in the context of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  A Fuchsia Howard; Lynda G Balneaves; Joan L Bottorff
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-10-03       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.