Literature DB >> 18338239

Predictors of choosing life-long screening or prophylactic surgery in women at high and moderate risk for breast and ovarian cancer.

J R J De Leeuw1, M J van Vliet, M G E M Ausems.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to summarize published empirical data describing the predictors of adhering to screening practices and choosing to have prophylactic surgery in women at increased risk for breast and ovarian cancer. Pubmed, Psychinfo and Cinahl databases were searched to identify studies on the predictors of adherence to breast and ovarian cancer screening and predictors of having a prophylactic mastectomy or salpingo-oophorectomy. We found 37 empirical studies that met our inclusion criteria. The main predictors of the use of preventive measures are related to DNA test results, socio-demographic characteristics, and psychological outcome measures. It is concluded that there is no unequivocal relationship between age, education, risk perception, or anxiety and adherence to breast and ovarian cancer screening practices. Worrying about cancer is associated with a higher adherence to screening practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18338239     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-008-9189-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  59 in total

1.  Psychological distress, health beliefs, and frequency of breast self-examination.

Authors:  J Erblich; D H Bovbjerg; H B Valdimarsdottir
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2000-06

2.  A descriptive study of breast cancer worry.

Authors:  K D McCaul; A D Branstetter; S M O'Donnell; K Jacobson; K B Quinlan
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1998-12

3.  Genetic testing for a BRCA1 mutation: prophylactic surgery and screening behavior in women 2 years post testing.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Botkin; Ken R Smith; Robert T Croyle; Bonnie J Baty; Jean E Wylie; Debra Dutson; Anna Chan; Heidi A Hamann; Caryn Lerman; Jamie McDonald; Vickie Venne; John H Ward; Elaine Lyon
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2003-04-30       Impact factor: 2.802

4.  Surgical decisions made by 158 women with hereditary breast cancer aged <50 years.

Authors:  D G R Evans; F Lalloo; P Hopwood; A Maurice; A Baildam; A Brain; L Barr; A Howell
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 4.424

5.  Younger women at increased risk for breast cancer: perceived risk, psychological well-being, and surveillance behavior.

Authors:  C Lerman; K Kash; M Stefanek
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1994

6.  Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing on psychologic distress in a clinic-based sample.

Authors:  Marc D Schwartz; Beth N Peshkin; Chanita Hughes; David Main; Claudine Isaacs; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Prophylactic surgery decisions and surveillance practices one year following BRCA1/2 testing.

Authors:  C Lerman; C Hughes; R T Croyle; D Main; C Durham; C Snyder; A Bonney; J F Lynch; S A Narod; H T Lynch
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Predictors of and satisfaction with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy.

Authors:  M E Stefanek; K J Helzlsouer; P M Wilcox; F Houn
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Breast cancer worry and mammography use by women with and without a family history in a population-based sample.

Authors:  M Robyn Andersen; Robert Smith; H Meischke; D Bowen; N Urban
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  A comprehensive evaluation of family history and breast cancer risk. The Utah Population Database.

Authors:  M L Slattery; R A Kerber
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-10-06       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  4 in total

1.  Cancer risk management in Tasmanian women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.

Authors:  Stephanie Kearton; Karen Wills; Michael Bunting; Penny Blomfield; Paul A James; Jo Burke
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 2.  New strategies in ovarian cancer: uptake and experience of women at high risk of ovarian cancer who are considering risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.

Authors:  Suzanne M Miller; Pagona Roussi; Mary B Daly; John Scarpato
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 3.  Decision making for breast cancer prevention among women at elevated risk.

Authors:  Tasleem J Padamsee; Celia E Wills; Lisa D Yee; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 6.466

4.  Ovarian Cancer Previvors: How to manage these patients?

Authors:  Jesus Paula Carvalho; Edmund Chada Baracat; Filomena Marino Carvalho
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 2.365

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.