Literature DB >> 19802692

Women's decision making about risk-reducing strategies in the context of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a systematic review.

A Fuchsia Howard1, Lynda G Balneaves, Joan L Bottorff.   

Abstract

Women who have a mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes have up to an 87% lifetime risk of breast cancer and up to a 40% lifetime risk of ovarian cancer. Cancer prevention and early detection strategies are often considered by these women to address this heightened risk. Risk-reducing strategies include risk-reducing mastectomy and oophorectomy, breast and ovarian cancer screening, and chemoprevention. This systematic literature review summarizes the factors and contexts that influence decision making related to cancer risk-reducing strategies among women at high-risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. In the 43 published research articles reviewed, three main types of factors are identified that influence high-risk women's decisions about risk-reducing strategies: a) medical and physical factors, b) psychological factors and c) social context factors. How these factors operate in women's lives over time remains unknown, and would best be elucidated through prospective, longitudinal research, as well as qualitative research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19802692     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-009-9245-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  60 in total

1.  A qualitative study of the information needs of high-risk women undergoing prophylactic oophorectomy.

Authors:  N Hallowell
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Surveillance behavior and prophylactic surgery after predictive testing for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Erna Claes; Gerry Evers-Kiebooms; Marleen Decruyenaere; Lieve Denayer; Andrea Boogaerts; Kristien Philippe; Eric Legius
Journal:  Behav Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.104

3.  BRCA1/2 testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families III: risk perception and screening.

Authors:  Aideen McInerney-Leo; Donald Hadley; Ronald G Kase; Therese R Giambarresi; Jeffery P Struewing; Barbara Bowles Biesecker
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 2.802

4.  Prophylactic surgery decisions and surveillance practices one year following BRCA1/2 testing.

Authors:  C Lerman; C Hughes; R T Croyle; D Main; C Durham; C Snyder; A Bonney; J F Lynch; S A Narod; H T Lynch
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.

Authors:  D Ford; D F Easton; M Stratton; S Narod; D Goldgar; P Devilee; D T Bishop; B Weber; G Lenoir; J Chang-Claude; H Sobol; M D Teare; J Struewing; A Arason; S Scherneck; J Peto; T R Rebbeck; P Tonin; S Neuhausen; R Barkardottir; J Eyfjord; H Lynch; B A Ponder; S A Gayther; M Zelada-Hedman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Predictors of and satisfaction with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy.

Authors:  M E Stefanek; K J Helzlsouer; P M Wilcox; F Houn
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Breast and ovarian cancer incidence in BRCA1-mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.

Authors:  D F Easton; D Ford; D T Bishop
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  International variation in rates of uptake of preventive options in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Kelly A Metcalfe; Daphna Birenbaum-Carmeli; Jan Lubinski; Jacek Gronwald; Henry Lynch; Pal Moller; Parviz Ghadirian; William D Foulkes; Jan Klijn; Eitan Friedman; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Peter Ainsworth; Barry Rosen; Susan Domchek; Teresa Wagner; Nadine Tung; Siranoush Manoukian; Fergus Couch; Ping Sun; Steven A Narod
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Attitudes to prophylactic surgery and chemoprevention in Australian women at increased risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  B Meiser; P Butow; M Price; B Bennett; G Berry; K Tucker
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  An exploratory qualitative study of women's perceptions of risk management options for familial ovarian cancer: implications for informed decision making.

Authors:  Kate Brain; Clare Gravell; Elizabeth France; Alison Fiander; Jonathon Gray
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.482

View more
  29 in total

1.  A qualitative study of rural women's views for the treatment of early breast cancer.

Authors:  Eli Ristevski; Melanie Regan; David Birks; Nicole Steers; Anny Byrne
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Concerns about unintended negative consequences of informing the public about multifactorial risks may be premature for young adult smokers.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Caroline Kincaid; Annette R Kaufman; Michelle L Stock; Laurel M Peterson; Nicole L Muscanell; Rosanna E Guadagno
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2013-10-01

3.  Predictors of risk-reducing surgery intentions following genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Mary Kathleen Ladd; Beth N Peshkin; Leigha Senter; Shari Baldinger; Claudine Isaacs; Hannah Segal; Samantha Philip; Chloe Phillips; Kate Shane; Aimee Martin; Veronique Weinstein; Robert Pilarski; Joanne Jeter; Kevin Sweet; Bonnie Hatten; Elisabeth J Wurtmann; Shanda Phippen; Della Bro; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  "It was an Emotional Baby": Previvors' Family Planning Decision-Making Styles about Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Marleah Dean; Emily A Rauscher
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  A Psychological Perspective on Factors Predicting Prophylactic Salpingo-Oophorectomy in a Sample of Italian Women from the General Population. Results from a Hypothetical Study in the Context of BRCA Mutations.

Authors:  Teresa Gavaruzzi; Alessandra Tasso; Marzena Franiuk; Liliana Varesco; Lorella Lotto
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Cancer risk management in Tasmanian women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.

Authors:  Stephanie Kearton; Karen Wills; Michael Bunting; Penny Blomfield; Paul A James; Jo Burke
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Catalysts to withdrawal from familial ovarian cancer screening for surgery and reactions to discontinued screening: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Kate J Lifford; Alison Clements; Lindsay Fraser; Deborah Lancastle; Kate Brain
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Genetic counseling content: How does it impact health behavior?

Authors:  Kimberly M Kelly; Lee Ellington; Nancy Schoenberg; Thomas Jackson; Stephanie Dickinson; Kyle Porter; Howard Leventhal; Michael Andrykowski
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2014-12-23

9.  Understanding the needs of women considering risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.

Authors:  Carol Cherry; Mary Ropka; Jennifer Lyle; Laura Napolitano; Mary B Daly
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.592

10.  The knowledge value-chain of genetic counseling for breast cancer: an empirical assessment of prediction and communication processes.

Authors:  Nabil Amara; Jolyane Blouin-Bougie; Jalila Jbilou; Norrin Halilem; Jacques Simard; Réjean Landry
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.