Literature DB >> 22477030

The consequences of risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: the case for a coordinated approach to long-term follow up post surgical menopause.

Carmel Pezaro1, Paul James, Joanne McKinley, Mary Shanahan, Mary-Anne Young, Gillian Mitchell.   

Abstract

Women with germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes have significantly increased lifetime risks of breast and ovarian cancer. To manage both the ovarian and breast cancer risks the current recommendation is undergo a risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) prior to natural menopause. To date, studies have focussed on quality of life and sexual dysfunction in women who undergo RRSO, but few have reported on the wider physical consequences. We performed a questionnaire study in women with BRCA 1 or 2 gene mutations known to the Peter MacCallum Familial Cancer Centre. We gathered information about ovarian surgery, ongoing follow-up, management of risk factors including osteoporosis, and current severity of menopausal symptoms. Two hundred and nineteen women were surveyed. One hundred and forty-three of 157 responding participants (91 %) reported having RRSO. Sixty one were pre-menopausal at RRSO. Post surgical follow-up rates were generally low, and a minority of women reported recent bone density imaging or pharmaceutical prevention or treatment of osteoporosis. Menopausal symptoms appeared generally mild. No significant differences in symptom severity were observed in women who underwent a pre-menopausal RRSO compared to RRSO after natural menopause. These data indicate that a formalised follow-up protocol is necessary to optimally manage the consequences of a RRSO.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22477030     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-012-9527-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  33 in total

1.  The Menopause Rating Scale (MRS): comparison with Kupperman index and quality-of-life scale SF-36.

Authors:  H P Schneider; L A Heinemann; H P Rosemeier; P Potthoff; H M Behre
Journal:  Climacteric       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.005

2.  Reproductive and hormonal factors, and ovarian cancer risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from the International BRCA1/2 Carrier Cohort Study.

Authors:  Antonis C Antoniou; Matti Rookus; Nadine Andrieu; Richard Brohet; Jenny Chang-Claude; Susan Peock; Margaret Cook; D Gareth Evans; Rosalind Eeles; Catherine Nogues; Laurence Faivre; Paul Gesta; Flora E van Leeuwen; Margreet G E M Ausems; Ana Osorio; Trinidad Caldes; Jacques Simard; Jan Lubinski; Anne-Marie Gerdes; Edith Olah; Christine Fürhauser; Hakan Olsson; Brita Arver; Paolo Radice; Douglas F Easton; David E Goldgar
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Salpingo-oophorectomy and the risk of ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancers in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation.

Authors:  Amy Finch; Mario Beiner; Jan Lubinski; Henry T Lynch; Pal Moller; Barry Rosen; Joan Murphy; Parviz Ghadirian; Eitan Friedman; William D Foulkes; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Teresa Wagner; Nadine Tung; Fergus Couch; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Peter Ainsworth; Mary Daly; Babara Pasini; Ruth Gershoni-Baruch; Charis Eng; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Jane McLennan; Beth Karlan; Jeffrey Weitzel; Ping Sun; Steven A Narod
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality.

Authors:  Susan M Domchek; Tara M Friebel; Christian F Singer; D Gareth Evans; Henry T Lynch; Claudine Isaacs; Judy E Garber; Susan L Neuhausen; Ellen Matloff; Rosalind Eeles; Gabriella Pichert; Laura Van t'veer; Nadine Tung; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Fergus J Couch; Wendy S Rubinstein; Patricia A Ganz; Mary B Daly; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Gail Tomlinson; Joellen Schildkraut; Joanne L Blum; Timothy R Rebbeck
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Survival among U.S. women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Valerie McGuire; Christine A Jesser; Alice S Whittemore
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  A prospective study of quality of life among women undergoing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy versus gynecologic screening for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Carolyn Y Fang; Carol Cherry; Karthik Devarajan; Tianyu Li; John Malick; Mary B Daly
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Increased cardiovascular mortality after early bilateral oophorectomy.

Authors:  Cathleen M Rivera; Brandon R Grossardt; Deborah J Rhodes; Robert D Brown; Véronique L Roger; L Joseph Melton; Walter A Rocca
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  International variation in rates of uptake of preventive options in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Kelly A Metcalfe; Daphna Birenbaum-Carmeli; Jan Lubinski; Jacek Gronwald; Henry Lynch; Pal Moller; Parviz Ghadirian; William D Foulkes; Jan Klijn; Eitan Friedman; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Peter Ainsworth; Barry Rosen; Susan Domchek; Teresa Wagner; Nadine Tung; Siranoush Manoukian; Fergus Couch; Ping Sun; Steven A Narod
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for the prevention of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast and gynecologic cancer: a multicenter, prospective study.

Authors:  Noah D Kauff; Susan M Domchek; Tara M Friebel; Mark E Robson; Johanna Lee; Judy E Garber; Claudine Isaacs; D Gareth Evans; Henry Lynch; Rosalind A Eeles; Susan L Neuhausen; Mary B Daly; Ellen Matloff; Joanne L Blum; Paul Sabbatini; Richard R Barakat; Clifford Hudis; Larry Norton; Kenneth Offit; Timothy R Rebbeck
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  No efficacy of annual gynaecological screening in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers; an observational follow-up study.

Authors:  B B J Hermsen; R I Olivier; R H M Verheijen; M van Beurden; J A de Hullu; L F Massuger; C W Burger; C T Brekelmans; M J Mourits; G H de Bock; K N Gaarenstroom; H H van Boven; T M Mooij; M A Rookus
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Ovarian Cancer Prevention in High-risk Women.

Authors:  Sarah M Temkin; Jennifer Bergstrom; Goli Samimi; Lori Minasian
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.190

Review 2.  Prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy as a prevention strategy in women at high-risk of ovarian cancer: a mini-review.

Authors:  Tess Schenberg; Gillian Mitchell
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 3.  Emotional and sexual concerns in women undergoing pelvic surgery and associated treatment for gynecologic cancer.

Authors:  Cara Stabile; Abigail Gunn; Yukio Sonoda; Jeanne Carter
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2015-04

4.  Mindfulness-based stress reduction for menopausal symptoms after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (PURSUE study): a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Cmg van Driel; G H de Bock; M J Schroevers; M J Mourits
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Genetic Variation and Hot Flashes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Carolyn J Crandall; Allison L Diamant; Margaret Maglione; Rebecca C Thurston; Janet Sinsheimer
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 5.958

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.