Literature DB >> 19529880

Peripheral bone density in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Helmut Franck1, Jurgen Gottwalt.   

Abstract

Bone loss in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) varies at different skeletal sites. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether bone mineral density (BMD) of the forearm is significantly different in patients with RA and controls and may correlate to BMD or other parameters of inflammation or bone resorption. We included 421 patients (357 women: mean age 58.4 +/- 12.87 years and 64 men: mean age 56.11 +/- 12.80 years) with RA in the study. BMD values of the ultradistal forearm (0.381 +/- 0.052 g/cm(2)) and middistal forearm (0.519 +/- 0.091 g/cm(2)) were significantly (p < 0.01) lower in women with RA than controls (0.395 +/- 0.043 and 0.535 +/- 0.052 g/cm(2), respectively). In contrast, there was no difference in bone density at the lumbar spine (women 0.921 +/- 0.1570 g/cm(2), men 0.941 +/- 0.144 g/cm(2)) or hip (women 08.11 +/- 0.140 g/cm(2), men 0.895 +/- 0.143 g/cm(2)) in patients with RA in comparison to controls (lumbar spine: women 0.930 +/- 0.146 g/cm(2); men 0.960 +/- 0.146 g/cm(2); hip: women 0.820 +/- 0.122 g/cm(2); men 0.899 +/- 0.144/cm(2)). Patients with increased inflammatory activity (elevated C-reactive protein) presented with significantly lower BMD of the hip (0.7533 +/- 0.144 versus 0.825 +/- 0.138 g/cm(2)) and ultradistal forearm (0.366 +/- 0.09 versus 0.390 +/- 0.07 g/cm(2)). This was not the case for the lumbar spine. BMD of the forearm is precise and, in contrast to BMD of the lumbar spine, significantly lower in patients with RA. It is related to inflammatory activity, grip strength, and treatment with glucocorticoids in patients with RA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19529880     DOI: 10.1007/s10067-009-1211-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  28 in total

1.  Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry of the forearm: reproducibility and correlation with single-photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  M S Leboff; G E Fuleihan; J E Angell; S Chung; K Curtis
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  The relation between joint erosion and generalized osteoporosis and disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Filiz Sivas; Nurdan Barça; Mustafa Onder; Kürşat Ozoran
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  An evaluation of forearm bone mineral measurement with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  G Larcos; H W Wahner
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Effects of disease and corticosteroids on appendicular bone mass in postmenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis: comparison with axial measurements.

Authors:  J C Martin; R Munro; M K Campbell; D M Reid
Journal:  Br J Rheumatol       Date:  1997-01

5.  Comparison of dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR), and conventional radiographs in the evaluation of osteoporosis and bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  T Jensen; M Hansen; K E Jensen; J Pødenphant; T M Hansen; L Hyldstrup
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Forearm bone mineral densitometry cannot be used to monitor response to alendronate therapy in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  M L Bouxsein; R A Parker; S L Greenspan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Forearm bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  J Iwamoto; T Takeda; S Ichimura
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2001-12-21       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Evaluation of bone mineral density, hormones, biochemical markers of bone metabolism, and osteoprotegerin serum levels in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  Helmut Franck; Thomas Meurer; Lorenz Christian Hofbauer
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.666

9.  Comparison of ultrasound and X-ray absorptiometry bone measurements in a case control study of female rheumatoid arthritis patients and randomly selected subjects in the population.

Authors:  G Haugeberg; R E Ørstavik; T Uhlig; J A Falch; J I Halse; T K Kvien
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone mineral measurement--comparison of a single-beam and fan-beam design: the effect of osteophytic calcification on spine bone mineral density.

Authors:  H Franck; M Munz; M Scherrer
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.333

View more
  3 in total

1.  Benefits of exercise in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Jennifer K Cooney; Rebecca-Jane Law; Verena Matschke; Andrew B Lemmey; Jonathan P Moore; Yasmeen Ahmad; Jeremy G Jones; Peter Maddison; Jeanette M Thom
Journal:  J Aging Res       Date:  2011-02-13

Review 2.  Revision total elbow replacement.

Authors:  Kuen Chin; Simon Lambert
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-07-03

3.  Changes in bone density and bone turnover in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with rituximab, results from an exploratory, prospective study.

Authors:  Gillian Wheater; Mohsen Elshahaly; Kamran Naraghi; Stephen P Tuck; Harish K Datta; Jacob M van Laar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.