Literature DB >> 16417049

Colorectal cancer screening: practices and attitudes of gastroenterologists, internists and surgeons.

Robert J Hilsden1, Elizabeth McGregor, Allison Murray, Shariq Khoja, Heather Bryant.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care has recommended the use of annual or biennial fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) and flexible sigmoidoscopy in the periodic health examination of asymptomatic people over 50 years of age. Therefore, we decided to ascertain the current colorectal cancer (CRC) screening practices and attitudes of surgeons, gastroenterologists and internists.
METHODS: In June 2002 (with a final mailing in December 2002), a questionnaire was sent to all gastroenterologists, internists and surgeons in Alberta. It included items on demographic and practice characteristics, CRC screening practices and opinions about CRC screening.
RESULTS: Responses were received from 42 gastroenterologists, 83 internists and 68 surgeons. Overall, 141 of 187 respondents (75.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 68.6%-81.4%) recommended that average-risk adults undergo CRC screening. Internists were less likely to recommend screening than either gastroenterologists or surgeons (95% CI for the difference 7.2%-32.8%). The most commonly recommended screening test was colonoscopy (70%), followed by FOBT (65%), flexible sigmoidoscopy (47%) and air-contrast barium enema (31%). Colonoscopy was the only test recommended by 7 (22.6%) of 33 gastroenterologists, 9 (16.4%) of 59 surgeons and 3 (6.1%) of 49 internists. Respondents were more likely to list barriers to the use of colonoscopy (mean 5 barriers) for screening than for either FOBT or flexible sigmoidoscopy (mean 2 barriers for both tests). Only 3 respondents indicated that they themselves would not undergo screening. Colonoscopy was the only screening test that 135 (70.0%) of the 193 would themselves undergo.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of Alberta specialists recommend CRC screening for average-risk adults. Colonoscopy was the most commonly recommended test, despite the perception of more barriers to that technique and the 2001 guidelines prepared by the Canadian Task Force for Preventive Health Care, which did not support colonoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16417049      PMCID: PMC3211734     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  14 in total

1.  Screening for colorectal cancer. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria.

Authors:  S N Glick; P W Ralls; D M Balfe; R L Bree; D J DiSantis; R Kidd; M S Levine; A J Megibow; D G Mezwa; S Saini; W P Shuman; F L Greene; L A Laine; K Lillemoe
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Colorectal cancer screening. Recommendation statement from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-07-24       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendation and rationale.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-16       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Are we doing enough to screen for colorectal cancer? Findings from the 1999 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

Authors:  Laura C Seeff; Jean A Shapiro; Marion R Nadel
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 0.493

5.  Prostate cancer testing: behaviour, motivation and attitudes among Western Australian men.

Authors:  T J Slevin; N Donnelly; J P Clarkson; D R English; J E Ward
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1999-08-16       Impact factor: 7.738

Review 6.  Cancer screening decisions.

Authors:  K D McCaul; H E Tulloch
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1999

7.  State trends in health risk factors and receipt of clinical preventive services among US adults during the 1990s.

Authors:  David E Nelson; Shayne Bland; Eve Powell-Griner; Richard Klein; Henry E Wells; Gary Hogelin; James S Marks
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002 May 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Are people being screened for colorectal cancer as recommended? Results from the National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Marion R Nadel; Donald K Blackman; Jean A Shapiro; Laura C Seeff
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-Update based on new evidence.

Authors:  Sidney Winawer; Robert Fletcher; Douglas Rex; John Bond; Randall Burt; Joseph Ferrucci; Theodore Ganiats; Theodore Levin; Steven Woolf; David Johnson; Lynne Kirk; Scott Litin; Clifford Simmang
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Screening men for prostate and colorectal cancer in the United States: does practice reflect the evidence?

Authors:  Brenda E Sirovich; Lisa M Schwartz; Steven Woloshin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-03-19       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  10 in total

1.  Common sense for a common problem: the question of screening the average-risk population for colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  Chris Vinden; Vivian C McAlister
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 2.  Cecal stampede: the headlong rush for screening colonoscopy: a position paper.

Authors:  Michael J Lawson; Martin Tobi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Screening and the family physician.

Authors:  Nicholas Pimlott
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Perception versus reality: overcoming barriers to colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Heather Bryant; S Elizabeth McGregor
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Pan-Canadian initiatives in colorectal cancer screening: adopting knowledge translation tools to accelerate uptake and impact.

Authors:  H E Bryant; S V Fekete; D H Major
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  The relationship between medical students' knowledge, confidence, experience, and skills related to colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Karen E Hauer; Luann Wilkerson; Arianne Teherani
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Frequency of colorectal cancer screening and the impact of family physicians on screening behaviour.

Authors:  Ryan Zarychanski; Yue Chen; Charles N Bernstein; Paul C Hébert
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Screening for Familial Colorectal Cancer Risk amongst Colonoscopy Patients New to an Open-Access Endoscopy Center.

Authors:  Sumana Moole; Thomas J McGarrity; Maria J Baker
Journal:  ISRN Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-03-22

9.  Adherence to colorectal cancer screening guidelines in Canada.

Authors:  Maida J Sewitch; Caroline Fournier; Antonio Ciampi; Alina Dyachenko
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Colorectal cancer screening behaviors of general surgeons and first-degree family members: a survey-based study.

Authors:  Suleyman Utku Celik; Hasan Gorkem Cay; Ersin Bayrakdar; Aysima Ince; Esra Nur Ince; Yasemin Celik; Yunus Emre Yucel; Mehmet Ali Koc; Siyar Ersoz; Cihangir Akyol
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 3.067

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.