Literature DB >> 12636464

Screening men for prostate and colorectal cancer in the United States: does practice reflect the evidence?

Brenda E Sirovich1, Lisa M Schwartz, Steven Woloshin.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The debate about the efficacy of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for prostate cancer has received substantial attention in the medical literature and the media, but the extent to which men are actually screened is unknown. If practice were evidence-based, PSA screening would be less common among men than colorectal cancer screening, a preventive service of broad acceptance and proven efficacy.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the prevalences of PSA and colorectal cancer screening among US men. DESIGN, SETTING, AND POPULATION: The 2001 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, an annual population-based telephone survey of US adults conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, was used to gather data on a representative sample of men aged 40 years or older from all 50 states and the District of Columbia (n = 49 315). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportions of men ever screened and up to date on screening for prostate cancer (with PSA testing) and colorectal cancer (with fecal occult blood testing, flexible sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy).
RESULTS: Overall, men are more likely to report having ever been screened for prostate cancer than for colorectal cancer; 75% of those aged 50 years or older have had a PSA test vs 63% for any colorectal cancer test (risk ratio [RR], 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-1.21). Up-to-date PSA screening is also more common than colorectal cancer screening for men of all ages. Among men aged 50 to 69 years (those for whom there is the greatest consensus in favor of screening), 54% reported an up-to-date PSA screen, while 45% reported up-to-date testing for colorectal cancer (RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.16-1.21). In state-level analyses of this age group, men were significantly more likely to be up to date on prostate cancer screening compared with colorectal cancer screening in 27 states, while up-to-date colorectal cancer screening was more common in only 1 state.
CONCLUSION: Among men in the United States, prostate cancer screening is more common than colorectal cancer screening. Physicians should ensure that men who choose to be screened for cancer are aware of the known mortality benefit of colorectal cancer screening and the uncertain benefits of screening for prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12636464     DOI: 10.1001/jama.289.11.1414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  101 in total

1.  Brief report: physicians and their personal prostate cancer-screening practices with prostate-specific antigen. A national survey.

Authors:  Evelyn C Y Chan; Michael J Barry; Sally W Vernon; Chul Ahn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  A computerized intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening for underserved populations: theoretical background and algorithm development.

Authors:  K Allen Greiner; Mugur V Geana; Aaron Epp; Angela Watson; Melissa Filippi; Christine Makosky Daley; Kimberly K Engelman; Aimee S James; Marci Campbell
Journal:  Technol Health Care       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.285

3.  Remaining Life Expectancy Measurement and PSA Screening of Older Men.

Authors:  Ashwin A Kotwal; Supriya G Mohile; William Dale
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 3.599

4.  Prostate-specific antigen testing for prostate cancer: Depleting a limited pool of susceptible individuals?

Authors:  Morten Valberg; Tom Grotmol; Steinar Tretli; Marit B Veierød; Tron A Moger; Susan S Devesa; Odd O Aalen
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  Brief report: Free prostate-specific antigen test utilization. Consistency with guidelines.

Authors:  Brian R Jackson; William L Roberts
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Behind Closed Doors: What Happens when Patients and Providers Talk about Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening?: Survey of the Effects of a Community-Based Intervention.

Authors:  Lauren McCormack; Pamela Williams-Piehota; Carla Bann
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  Older age does not impact perioperative complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Leah Y Nakamura; Rafael N Nunez; Paul E Andrews; Robert G Ferrigni; Mitchell R Humphreys; Scott K Swanson; Christopher E Wolter; Erik P Castle
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-02-05

Review 8.  Cancer disparities in people with HIV: A systematic review of screening for non-AIDS-defining malignancies.

Authors:  Kelsey L Corrigan; Kevin C Wall; John A Bartlett; Gita Suneja
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Vascular targeted photodynamic therapy for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2008

10.  Patient-Provider Communication About Prostate Cancer Screening and Treatment: New Evidence From the Health Information National Trends Survey.

Authors:  Soumitra S Bhuyan; Aastha Chandak; Niodita Gupta; Sudhir Isharwal; Chad LaGrange; Asos Mahmood; Dan Gentry
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2016-07-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.