BACKGROUND: Despite the positive conclusions of several randomized controlled trials and the publication of national recommendations on colorectal cancer (crc) screening, uptake remained low. The inauguration of the National Colorectal Cancer Screening Network in 2007, the same year that the first screening program was announced in Canada, provided an opportunity for integrated knowledge translation to accelerate the processes of program implementation and screening uptake. AIM: Two primary aims were identified. The first focused on means to monitor the effects of various implementation plans in delivering high-quality population-based crc screening. The second focused on identifying and addressing knowledge gaps that may impair screening participation. METHOD: The methods used are described in the context of the knowledge-to-action cycle and demonstrate that the initiative itself dictates the point in the cycle at which to start. RESULTS: The identified need to monitor various implementation plans resulted in the shared development of a quality determinants document. All programs committed to designing data collection so that core components could be measured and compared; 6 operating programs have conducted the first data collection, which will allow for monitoring and for new knowledge creation as the process develops further. The knowledge gap identification project started with new knowledge creation, which identified a higher-than-expected willingness of Canadians to discuss crc screening with physicians, but a low level of understanding of screening as a wellness-related behaviour. Knowledge translation interventions have been developed with the stakeholders to address those gaps, and ongoing surveys to be carried out later in 2011 will help to gauge progress in the understanding and acceptance of crc screening by the population. CONCLUSIONS: A national network that engaged all programs, policymakers, experts, and lay representatives successfully used knowledge translation principles to enhance the trajectory of crc screening in Canada.
BACKGROUND: Despite the positive conclusions of several randomized controlled trials and the publication of national recommendations on colorectal cancer (crc) screening, uptake remained low. The inauguration of the National Colorectal Cancer Screening Network in 2007, the same year that the first screening program was announced in Canada, provided an opportunity for integrated knowledge translation to accelerate the processes of program implementation and screening uptake. AIM: Two primary aims were identified. The first focused on means to monitor the effects of various implementation plans in delivering high-quality population-based crc screening. The second focused on identifying and addressing knowledge gaps that may impair screening participation. METHOD: The methods used are described in the context of the knowledge-to-action cycle and demonstrate that the initiative itself dictates the point in the cycle at which to start. RESULTS: The identified need to monitor various implementation plans resulted in the shared development of a quality determinants document. All programs committed to designing data collection so that core components could be measured and compared; 6 operating programs have conducted the first data collection, which will allow for monitoring and for new knowledge creation as the process develops further. The knowledge gap identification project started with new knowledge creation, which identified a higher-than-expected willingness of Canadians to discuss crc screening with physicians, but a low level of understanding of screening as a wellness-related behaviour. Knowledge translation interventions have been developed with the stakeholders to address those gaps, and ongoing surveys to be carried out later in 2011 will help to gauge progress in the understanding and acceptance of crc screening by the population. CONCLUSIONS: A national network that engaged all programs, policymakers, experts, and lay representatives successfully used knowledge translation principles to enhance the trajectory of crc screening in Canada.
Authors: Michael J Duffy; Leo G M van Rossum; Sietze T van Turenhout; Outi Malminiemi; Catherine Sturgeon; Rolf Lamerz; Andrea Nicolini; Caj Haglund; Lubos Holubec; Callum G Fraser; Stephen P Halloran Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2011-01-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: J D Hardcastle; J O Chamberlain; M H Robinson; S M Moss; S S Amar; T W Balfour; P D James; C M Mangham Journal: Lancet Date: 1996-11-30 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Katie M Di Sebastiano; Gayathri Murthy; Kristin L Campbell; Sophie Desroches; Rachel A Murphy Journal: Adv Nutr Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 8.701
Authors: Nathan M Solbak; Jian-Yi Xu; Jennifer E Vena; Ala Al Rajabi; Sanaz Vaseghi; Heather K Whelan; S Elizabeth McGregor Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-01-25 Impact factor: 3.295