Literature DB >> 10854458

Cancer screening decisions.

K D McCaul1, H E Tulloch.   

Abstract

This review focuses on why people decide to obtain or to avoid screening for cancer. We discuss three topics: (a) physician prompts that may elicit compliant screening behavior, (b) the independent and joint effects of risk perceptions and worry, and (c) the costs and benefits of getting screened. Overall, the data suggest that each of these factors will influence screening. So, for example, people are more likely to seek screening if a physician recommends the behavior, if they feel personally vulnerable and worry a little about cancer, if insurance covers the screening, and if they believe that the test is an effective early detection procedure. Future research needs include studies comparing theories, longitudinal rather than cross-sectional studies, and true experiments. We also need to know more about why physicians are such powerful change agents and the trade-offs of increasing personal risk versus exacerbating worry. Practical recommendations for promoting cancer screening include encouraging physician interventions, explaining risk, and lowering the costs while emphasizing the benefits of screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10854458     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a024209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr        ISSN: 1052-6773


  16 in total

1.  Effects of personalized colorectal cancer risk information on laypersons' interest in colorectal cancer screening: The importance of individual differences.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Christine W Duarte; Susannah Daggett; Andrea Siewers; Bill Killam; Kahsi A Smith; Andrew N Freedman
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2015-07-19

2.  Modeling pathways to affective barriers on colorectal cancer screening among Japanese Americans.

Authors:  Keiko Honda; Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2005-04

3.  Colorectal cancer screening: practices and attitudes of gastroenterologists, internists and surgeons.

Authors:  Robert J Hilsden; Elizabeth McGregor; Allison Murray; Shariq Khoja; Heather Bryant
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  HPV-related risk perceptions and HPV vaccine uptake among a sample of young rural women.

Authors:  Robin C Vanderpool; Baretta R Casey; Richard A Crosby
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2011-12

5.  Affective associations and cognitive beliefs relate to individuals' decisions to perform testicular or breast self-exams.

Authors:  Carolyn R Brown-Kramer; Marc T Kiviniemi
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-04-08

6.  Gay and bisexual men's willingness to receive anal Papanicolaou testing.

Authors:  Alison C Reed; Paul L Reiter; Jennifer S Smith; Joel M Palefsky; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 7.  Variation in Cervical Cancer Screening Preferences among Medically Underserved Individuals in the United States: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Caitlin B Biddell; Meghan C O'Leary; Stephanie B Wheeler; Lisa P Spees
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Health care access and breast cancer screening among Latinas along the California-Mexican border.

Authors:  Sheila F Castañeda; Vanessa L Malcarne; Pennie G Foster-Fishman; William S Davidson; Manpreet K Mumman; Natasha Riley; Georgia R Sadler
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2014-08

9.  Differential Use of Screening Mammography in Older Women Initiating Metformin versus Sulfonylurea.

Authors:  Jin-Liern Hong; Louise M Henderson; Michele Jonsson Funk; Jennifer L Lund; John B Buse; Virginia Pate; Til Stürmer
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.890

10.  Health care utilization, lifestyle, and emotional factors and mammography practices in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Authors:  Shoshana M Rosenberg; Chaya S Moskowitz; Jennifer S Ford; Tara O Henderson; A Lindsay Frazier; Lisa R Diller; Melissa M Hudson; Annette L Stanton; Joanne F Chou; Stephanie Smith; Wendy M Leisenring; Ann C Mertens; Cheryl L Cox; Paul C Nathan; Kevin R Krull; Leslie L Robison; Kevin C Oeffinger
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.