Literature DB >> 1640742

Damage in peripheral nerve from continuous electrical stimulation: comparison of two stimulus waveforms.

D B McCreery1, W F Agnew, T G Yuen, L A Bullara.   

Abstract

The propensity for two types of charge-balanced stimulus waveforms to induce injury during eight hours of continuous electrical stimulation of the cat sciatic nerve was investigated. One waveform was a biphasic, controlled-current pulse pair, each phase 50 microseconds in duration, with no delay between the phases ('short pulse', selected to excite primarily large axons), whereas in the second type each phase was 100 microseconds in duration, with a 400 microsecond delay between the phases (selected to excite axons of a broader spectrum of diameters). The sciatic nerve was examined for early axonal degeneration (EAD) seven days after the session of continuous stimulation. With both waveforms, the threshold stimulus current for axonal injury was greater than the current required to excite all of the nerve's large axons. The correlation between simple stimulus parameters and the amount of EAD was poor, especially with the 'short pulse' waveform, probably due to variability between animals. When the stimulus was normalised with respect to the current required to fully recruit the large axons, a good association between damage and stimulus amplitude emerged. The damage threshold was higher for the 'short pulse' waveform. The implications for clinical protocols are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1640742     DOI: 10.1007/bf02446202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  9 in total

Review 1.  Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: a review.

Authors:  J B Ranck
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1975-11-21       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Charge density and charge per phase as cofactors in neural injury induced by electrical stimulation.

Authors:  D B McCreery; W F Agnew; T G Yuen; L Bullara
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Local anaesthetic block protects against electrically-induced damage in peripheral nerve.

Authors:  W F Agnew; D B McCreery; T G Yuen; L A Bullara
Journal:  J Biomed Eng       Date:  1990-07

4.  The choice of pulse duration for chronic electrical stimulation via surface, nerve, and intramuscular electrodes.

Authors:  P E Crago; P H Peckham; J T Mortimer; J P Van der Meulen
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Urinary striated sphincter: what is its nerve supply?

Authors:  E A Tanagho; R A Schmidt; C G de Araujo
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  The effect of stimulus parameters on the recruitment characteristics of direct nerve stimulation.

Authors:  P H Gorman; J T Mortimer
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Physiology of the urinary bladder and urethra.

Authors:  W C deGroat; A M Booth
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Histological evaluation of neural damage from electrical stimulation: considerations for the selection of parameters for clinical application.

Authors:  T G Yuen; W F Agnew; L A Bullara; S Jacques; D B McCreery
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Histologic and physiologic evaluation of electrically stimulated peripheral nerve: considerations for the selection of parameters.

Authors:  W F Agnew; D B McCreery; T G Yuen; L A Bullara
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.934

  9 in total
  21 in total

1.  Neural morphological effects of long-term implantation of the self-sizing spiral cuff nerve electrode.

Authors:  E Romero; J F Denef; J Delbeke; A Robert; C Veraart
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Nerve conduction block utilising high-frequency alternating current.

Authors:  K L Kilgore; N Bhadra
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Different pulse shapes for selective large fibre block in sacral nerve roots using a technique of anodal block: an experimental study.

Authors:  A Vucković; N J M Rijkhoff
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Electrophysiological and histological studies of chronically implanted intrapapillary microelectrodes in rabbit eyes.

Authors:  Xiaoyun Fang; Hirokazu Sakaguchi; Takashi Fujikado; Makoto Osanai; Yasushi Ikuno; Motohiro Kamei; Masahito Ohji; Tetsuya Yagi; Yasuo Tano
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Depolarization and electrical stimulation enhance in vitro and in vivo sensory axon growth after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Ioana Goganau; Beatrice Sandner; Norbert Weidner; Karim Fouad; Armin Blesch
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2017-11-26       Impact factor: 5.330

6.  Destructive effect of monopolar electrocautery knife usage on femoral artery endothelium during spine surgery: experimental study.

Authors:  Ednan Bayram; Muhammet Çalik; Canan Atalay; Mehmet Dumlu Aydin; Cemal Gundogdu; Hasan Kocaturk
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2009-08

7.  Testing paradigms for assistive hearing devices in diverse acoustic environments.

Authors:  Ram M C Charan; Hussnain Ali; John H L Hansen
Journal:  Interspeech       Date:  2018-09

8.  Relationship between stimulus amplitude, stimulus frequency and neural damage during electrical stimulation of sciatic nerve of cat.

Authors:  D B McCreery; W F Agnew; T G Yuen; L A Bullara
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  The development of neural stimulators: a review of preclinical safety and efficacy studies.

Authors:  Robert K Shepherd; Joel Villalobos; Owen Burns; David A X Nayagam
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Neural electrode degradation from continuous electrical stimulation: comparison of sputtered and activated iridium oxide.

Authors:  Sandeep Negi; Rajmohan Bhandari; Loren Rieth; Rick Van Wagenen; Florian Solzbacher
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 2.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.