Literature DB >> 7301072

Histological evaluation of neural damage from electrical stimulation: considerations for the selection of parameters for clinical application.

T G Yuen, W F Agnew, L A Bullara, S Jacques, D B McCreery.   

Abstract

The relationship of charge density per phase, or QD/ph (expressed in units of microcoulombs per cm2 per phase of the charge-balanced wave form), and total charge (QDt) to neural damage has been investigated by light and electron microscopy after surface stimulation of the parietal cortex in normal cats. QD/ph values ranging from 40 to 400 were achieved by varying several stimulus parameters. The least amount of neural damage in this study was observed at QD/ph 40). The extent of neural injury at stimulated sites increased with the charge density and was evident as disruption of cell membranes, intracytoplasmic vacoulation, an increasing glycogen content, the deposition of intracellular calcium hydroxyapatite, and neuronal and astrocytic degeneration. Although individual factors contributing to neural damage are isolated with difficulty, charge density and total charge seem to be predominant among the contributing parameters. In view of these findings, recommendations have been made for the selection of electrical stimulus parameters to be used in central nervous system prostheses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7301072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  40 in total

1.  Damage in peripheral nerve from continuous electrical stimulation: comparison of two stimulus waveforms.

Authors:  D B McCreery; W F Agnew; T G Yuen; L A Bullara
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the excitability of the leg motor cortex.

Authors:  Dean T Jeffery; Jonathan A Norton; Francois D Roy; Monica A Gorassini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Genetic algorithm reveals energy-efficient waveforms for neural stimulation.

Authors:  Amorn Wongsarnpigoon; Warren M Grill
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2009

4.  Safety assessment of epidural wire electrodes for cough production in a chronic pig model of spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Krzysztof E Kowalski; Tomasz Kowalski; Anthony F DiMarco
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Safety parameter considerations of anodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in rats.

Authors:  Mark P Jackson; Dennis Truong; Milene L Brownlow; Jessica A Wagner; R Andy McKinley; Marom Bikson; Ryan Jankord
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 7.217

6.  Electrodes for high-definition transcutaneous DC stimulation for applications in drug delivery and electrotherapy, including tDCS.

Authors:  Preet Minhas; Varun Bansal; Jinal Patel; Johnson S Ho; Julian Diaz; Abhishek Datta; Marom Bikson
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  Efficiency analysis of waveform shape for electrical excitation of nerve fibers.

Authors:  Amorn Wongsarnpigoon; John P Woock; Warren M Grill
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 3.802

8.  Calcium activation of cortical neurons by continuous electrical stimulation: Frequency dependence, temporal fidelity, and activation density.

Authors:  Nicholas J Michelson; James R Eles; Alberto L Vazquez; Kip A Ludwig; Takashi D Y Kozai
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 4.164

9.  Mechanisms determining safety and performance of brain stimulating electrodes.

Authors:  Dana Lynn Andre; Balaji Shanmugasundaram; Jonathan Mason; Corina Drapaca; Bruce J Gluckman
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2009

10.  Comparison of neural damage induced by electrical stimulation with faradaic and capacitor electrodes.

Authors:  D B McCreery; W F Agnew; T G Yuen; L A Bullara
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.