Literature DB >> 16387858

Demonstration of cue recruitment: change in visual appearance by means of Pavlovian conditioning.

Qi Haijiang1, Jeffrey A Saunders, Rebecca W Stone, Benjamin T Backus.   

Abstract

Until half a century ago, associative learning played a fundamental role in theories of perceptual appearance [Berkeley, G. (1709) An Essay Towards a New Theory of Vision (Dublin), 1st Ed.]. But starting in 1955 [Gibson, J. J. & Gibson, E. J. (1955) Psychol. Rev. 62, 32-41], most studies of perceptual learning have not been concerned with association or appearance but rather with improvements in discrimination ability. Here we describe a "cue recruitment" experiment, which is a straightforward adaptation of Pavlov's classical conditioning experiment, that we used to measure changes in visual appearance caused by exposure to novel pairings of signals in visual stimuli. Trainees viewed movies of a rotating wire-frame (Necker) cube. This stimulus is perceptually bistable. On training trials, depth cues (stereo and occlusion) were added to force the perceived direction of rotation. Critically, an additional signal was also added, contingent on rotation direction. Stimuli on test trials contained the new signal but not the depth cues. Over 45 min, two of the three new signals that we tested acquired the ability to bias perceived rotation direction on their own. Results were consistent across the eight trainees in each experiment, and the new cue's effectiveness was long lasting. Whereas most adaptation aftereffects on appearance are opposite in direction to the training stimuli, these effects were positive. An individual new signal can be recruited by the visual system as a cue for the construction of visual appearance. Cue recruitment experiments may prove useful for reexamining of the role of experience in perception.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16387858      PMCID: PMC1326158          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0506728103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  47 in total

1.  Experience-dependent integration of texture and motion cues to depth.

Authors:  R A Jacobs; I Fine
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Unsupervised statistical learning of higher-order spatial structures from visual scenes.

Authors:  J Fiser; R N Aslin
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-11

3.  The exploitation of regularities in the environment by the brain.

Authors:  H Barlow
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 4.  Object perception as Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Daniel Kersten; Pascal Mamassian; Alan Yuille
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 24.137

5.  Perceptual learning; differentiation or enrichment?

Authors:  J J GIBSON; E J GIBSON
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1955-01       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Recognition and the localization of visual traces.

Authors:  H WALLACH; P AUSTIN
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1954-06

7.  Experience-dependent visual cue integration based on consistencies between visual and haptic percepts.

Authors:  J E Atkins; J Fiser; R A Jacobs
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Pavlovian conditioning. It's not what you think it is.

Authors:  R A Rescorla
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1988-03

9.  Facilitation of perception by spelling contraints.

Authors:  J Baron
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1974-03

10.  Abrupt learning and retinal size specificity in illusory-contour perception.

Authors:  N Rubin; K Nakayama; R Shapley
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1997-07-01       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  51 in total

1.  Persistent states in vision break universality and time invariance.

Authors:  Mark Wexler; Marianne Duyck; Pascal Mamassian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Perceived slant of binocularly viewed large-scale surfaces: a common model from explicit and implicit measures.

Authors:  Zhi Li; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  How direction of illumination affects visually perceived surface roughness.

Authors:  Yun-Xian Ho; Michael S Landy; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Competition between newly recruited and pre-existing visual cues during the construction of visual appearance.

Authors:  Benjamin T Backus; Qi Haijiang
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  The effect of viewpoint on perceived visual roughness.

Authors:  Yun-Xian Ho; Laurence T Maloney; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Category-level contributions to the alphanumeric category effect in visual search.

Authors:  J Paul Hamilton; Michelle Mirkin; Thad A Polk
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-12

7.  Perceptual learning depends on perceptual constancy.

Authors:  Patrick Garrigan; Philip J Kellman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Adapting to altered image statistics using processed video.

Authors:  Michael Falconbridge; David Wozny; Ladan Shams; Stephen A Engel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-04-11       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  The role of visuohaptic experience in visually perceived depth.

Authors:  Yun-Xian Ho; Sascha Serwe; Julia Trommershäuser; Laurence T Maloney; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Vision contingent auditory pitch aftereffects.

Authors:  Wataru Teramoto; Maori Kobayashi; Souta Hidaka; Yoichi Sugita
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-02       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.