Literature DB >> 21188784

Perceived slant of binocularly viewed large-scale surfaces: a common model from explicit and implicit measures.

Zhi Li1, Frank H Durgin.   

Abstract

It is known that the perceived slants of large distal surfaces, such as hills, are exaggerated and that the exaggeration increases with distance. In a series of two experiments, we parametrically investigated the effect of viewing distance and slant on perceived slant using a high-fidelity virtual environment. An explicit numerical estimation method and an implicit aspect-ratio approach were separately used to assess the perceived optical slant of simulated large-scale surfaces with different slants and viewing distances while gaze direction was fixed. The results showed that perceived optical slant increased logarithmically with viewing distance and the increase was proportionally greater for shallow slants. At each viewing distance, perceived optical slant could be approximately fit by linear functions of actual slant that were parallel across distances. These linear functions demonstrated a fairly constant gain of about 1.5 and an intercept that increased logarithmically with distance. A comprehensive three-parameter model based on the present data provides a good fit to a number of previous empirical observations measured in real environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21188784      PMCID: PMC3156410          DOI: 10.1167/10.14.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  38 in total

1.  Distance determined by the angular declination below the horizon.

Authors:  T L Ooi; B Wu; Z J He
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-11-08       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Is the anisotropy of perceived 3-D shape invariant across scale?

Authors:  J M Loomis; J W Philbeck
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-04

3.  Visual perception of extent and the geometry of visual space.

Authors:  John M Foley; Nilton P Ribeiro-Filho; José A Da Silva
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Visually perceived eye level: changes induced by a pitched-from-vertical 2-line visual field.

Authors:  L Matin; W X Li
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Inaccurate representation of the ground surface beyond a texture boundary.

Authors:  Bing Wu; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Binocular depth discrimination and estimation beyond interaction space.

Authors:  Robert S Allison; Barbara J Gillam; Elia Vecellio
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Development of size constancy in children: a test of the metacognitive theory.

Authors:  Carl E Granrud
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  The perception of visual surfaces.

Authors:  J J GIBSON
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1950-07

9.  Optic flow and the metric of the visual ground plane.

Authors:  J M Beusmans
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Surface orientation from texture: ideal observers, generic observers and the information content of texture cues.

Authors:  D C Knill
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  24 in total

1.  Depth compression based on mis-scaling of binocular disparity may contribute to angular expansion in perceived optical slant.

Authors:  Zhi Li; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Does perceived angular declination contribute to perceived optical slant on level ground?

Authors:  Zhi Li; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  The social psychology of perception experiments: hills, backpacks, glucose, and the problem of generalizability.

Authors:  Frank H Durgin; Brennan Klein; Ariana Spiegel; Cassandra J Strawser; Morgan Williams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  A large-scale horizontal-vertical illusion produced with small objects separated in depth.

Authors:  Zhi Li; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  The underestimation of egocentric distance: evidence from frontal matching tasks.

Authors:  Zhi Li; John Phillips; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Counterpoint.

Authors:  Frank H Durgin
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-03

7.  Manual anchoring biases in slant estimation affect matches even for near surfaces.

Authors:  Dennis M Shaffer; Eric McManama; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12

8.  Manual matching of perceived surface orientation is affected by arm posture: evidence of calibration between proprioception and visual experience in near space.

Authors:  Zhi Li; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  On the anisotropy of perceived ground extents and the interpretation of walked distance as a measure of perception.

Authors:  Zhi Li; Emily Sun; Cassandra J Strawser; Ariana Spiegel; Brennan Klein; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Large perceptual distortions of locomotor action space occur in ground-based coordinates: Angular expansion and the large-scale horizontal-vertical illusion.

Authors:  Brennan J Klein; Zhi Li; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.