Literature DB >> 11166048

Experience-dependent visual cue integration based on consistencies between visual and haptic percepts.

J E Atkins1, J Fiser, R A Jacobs.   

Abstract

We study the hypothesis that observers can use haptic percepts as a standard against which the relative reliabilities of visual cues can be judged, and that these reliabilities determine how observers combine depth information provided by these cues. Using a novel visuo-haptic virtual reality environment, subjects viewed and grasped virtual objects. In Experiment 1, subjects were trained under motion relevant conditions, during which haptic and visual motion cues were consistent whereas haptic and visual texture cues were uncorrelated, and texture relevant conditions, during which haptic and texture cues were consistent whereas haptic and motion cues were uncorrelated. Subjects relied more on the motion cue after motion relevant training than after texture relevant training, and more on the texture cue after texture relevant training than after motion relevant training. Experiment 2 studied whether or not subjects could adapt their visual cue combination strategies in a context-dependent manner based on context-dependent consistencies between haptic and visual cues. Subjects successfully learned two cue combination strategies in parallel, and correctly applied each strategy in its appropriate context. Experiment 3, which was similar to Experiment 1 except that it used a more naturalistic experimental task, yielded the same pattern of results as Experiment 1 indicating that the findings do not depend on the precise nature of the experimental task. Overall, the results suggest that observers can involuntarily compare visual and haptic percepts in order to evaluate the relative reliabilities of visual cues, and that these reliabilities determine how cues are combined during three-dimensional visual perception.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11166048     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00254-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  25 in total

1.  Demonstration of cue recruitment: change in visual appearance by means of Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  Qi Haijiang; Jeffrey A Saunders; Rebecca W Stone; Benjamin T Backus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The role of visuohaptic experience in visually perceived depth.

Authors:  Yun-Xian Ho; Sascha Serwe; Julia Trommershäuser; Laurence T Maloney; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Collision error avoidance: influence of proportion congruency and sensorimotor memory on open-loop grasp control.

Authors:  Ryan Brydges; Adam Dubrowski
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Do adjustments in search behavior depend on the precision of spatial memory?

Authors:  G Pfuhl; L B G Barrera; M Living; R Biegler
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Neck muscle spindle noise biases reaches in a multisensory integration task.

Authors:  Parisa Abedi Khoozani; Gunnar Blohm
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Modality-specific attention attenuates visual-tactile integration and recalibration effects by reducing prior expectations of a common source for vision and touch.

Authors:  Stephanie Badde; Karen T Navarro; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2020-02-06

7.  Using variability to guide dimensional weighting: associative mechanisms in early word learning.

Authors:  Keith S Apfelbaum; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-05-24

Review 8.  Statistically optimal perception and learning: from behavior to neural representations.

Authors:  József Fiser; Pietro Berkes; Gergo Orbán; Máté Lengyel
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Illusory visual-depth reversal can modulate sensations of contact surface.

Authors:  Yuka Igarashi; Keiko Omori; Tetsuya Arai; Yasunori Aizawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Humans use predictive kinematic models to calibrate visual cues to three-dimensional surface slant.

Authors:  Peter Scarfe; Andrew Glennerster
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.