Literature DB >> 16881794

How direction of illumination affects visually perceived surface roughness.

Yun-Xian Ho1, Michael S Landy, Laurence T Maloney.   

Abstract

We examined visual estimation of surface roughness using random, computer-generated, three-dimensional (3D) surfaces rendered under a mixture of diffuse lighting and a punctate source. The angle between the tangent to the plane containing the surface texture and the direction to the punctate source was varied from 50 to 70 deg across lighting conditions. Observers were presented with pairs of surfaces under different lighting conditions and indicated which 3D surface appeared rougher. Surfaces were viewed either in isolation or in scenes with added objects whose shading, cast shadows, and specular highlights provided information about the spatial distribution of illumination. All observers perceived surfaces to be markedly rougher with decreasing illuminant angle. Performance in scenes with added objects was no closer to constant than that in scenes without added objects. We identified four novel cues that are valid cues to roughness under any single lighting condition but that are not invariant under changes in lighting condition. We modeled observers' deviations from roughness constancy as a weighted linear combination of these "pseudocues" and found that they account for a substantial amount of observers' systematic deviations from roughness constancy with changes in lighting condition.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16881794      PMCID: PMC2761220          DOI: 10.1167/6.5.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  22 in total

1.  Tactile roughness perception with a rigid link interposed between skin and surface.

Authors:  R L Klatzky; S J Lederman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-05

2.  Experience-dependent integration of texture and motion cues to depth.

Authors:  R A Jacobs; I Fine
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Illuminant cues in surface color perception: tests of three candidate cues.

Authors:  J N Yang; L T Maloney
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Recognition and the localization of visual traces.

Authors:  H WALLACH; P AUSTIN
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1954-06

5.  Human observers compensate for secondary illumination originating in nearby chromatic surfaces.

Authors:  Katja Doerschner; Huseyin Boyaci; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Perceived surface color in binocularly viewed scenes with two light sources differing in chromaticity.

Authors:  Huseyin Boyaci; Katja Doerschner; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-08-23       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Measurements of the effect of surface slant on perceived lightness.

Authors:  Caterina Ripamonti; Marina Bloj; Robin Hauck; Mitha Kiran; Scott Greenwald; Shannon I Maloney; David H Brainard
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-09-08       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Perturbation study of shading in pictures.

Authors:  J J Koenderink; A J van Doorn; C Christou; I S Lappin
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Perceived roughness of a grating: correlation with responses of mechanoreceptive afferents innervating the monkey's fingerpad.

Authors:  K Sathian; A W Goodwin; K T John; I Darian-Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion.

Authors:  M S Landy; L T Maloney; E B Johnston; M Young
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Color and material perception: achievements and challenges.

Authors:  Laurence T Maloney; David H Brainard
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Detection of light transformations and concomitant changes in surface albedo.

Authors:  Holly E Gerhard; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Visual perception: a gloss on surface properties.

Authors:  Michael S Landy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The effect of viewpoint on perceived visual roughness.

Authors:  Yun-Xian Ho; Laurence T Maloney; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Conjoint measurement of gloss and surface texture.

Authors:  Yun-Xian Ho; Michael S Landy; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-02

6.  The role of visuohaptic experience in visually perceived depth.

Authors:  Yun-Xian Ho; Sascha Serwe; Julia Trommershäuser; Laurence T Maloney; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The influence of shape cues on the perception of lighting direction.

Authors:  James P O'Shea; Maneesh Agrawala; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Visual motion and the perception of surface material.

Authors:  Katja Doerschner; Roland W Fleming; Ozgur Yilmaz; Paul R Schrater; Bruce Hartung; Daniel Kersten
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Invariant texture perception is harder with synthetic textures: Implications for models of texture processing.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas; Catherine Conlin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Effect of pictorial depth cues, binocular disparity cues and motion parallax depth cues on lightness perception in three-dimensional virtual scenes.

Authors:  Michiteru Kitazaki; Hisashi Kobiki; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.