Literature DB >> 7608225

Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Decompression with and without arthrodesis.

D Grob1, T Humke, J Dvorak.   

Abstract

We prospectively evaluated the results of decompression of the spine, with and without arthrodesis, for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis without instability in forty-five patients (twenty-one men and twenty-four women) who had been managed between November 1989 and November 1990. The average age at the time of the operation was sixty-seven years (range, forty-eight to eighty-seven years). The patients were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups (fifteen patients in each group) according to when they were admitted to the hospital. Group I was treated with decompression with laminotomy and medial facetectomy; Group II, with decompression and arthrodesis of the most stenotic segment; and Group III, with decompression and arthrodesis of all of the decompressed vertebral segments. All of the operations were performed by the same surgeon. The average duration of follow-up was twenty-eight months (range, twenty-four to thirty-two months). All three groups had a significant improvement in the distance that the patients were able to walk at the time of the latest follow-up examination compared with before the operation (p < 0.001 for Group I, p < 0.002 for Group II, and p < 0.005 for Group III). With the numbers available, there were no significant differences in the results among the three groups with regard to the relief of pain (p = 0.25 for Group I compared with Group II, p = 0.36 for Group II compared with Group III, and p = 0.92 for Group I compared with Group III).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7608225     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199507000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  30 in total

1.  Expansive lumbar laminoplasty for degenerative spinal stenosis in patients below 70 years of age.

Authors:  H Matsui; M Kanamori; H Ishihara; N Hirano; H Tsuji
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Effect of fusion following decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Lin Liang; Wei-Min Jiang; Xue-Feng Li; Heng Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

3.  Spinal stenosis re-operation rate in Sweden is 11% at 10 years--a national analysis of 9,664 operations.

Authors:  Karl-Ake Jansson; Gunnar Németh; F Granath; P Blomqvist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Outcome of invasive treatment modalities on back pain and sciatica: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Maurits W van Tulder; Bart Koes; Seppo Seitsalo; Antti Malmivaara
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The effect of duration of symptoms on standard outcome measures in the surgical treatment of spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Leslie C L Ng; Suhayl Tafazal; Philip Sell
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Midterm outcome after unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: 5-year prospective study.

Authors:  Halit Cavuşoğlu; Ramazan Alper Kaya; Osman Nuri Türkmenoglu; Cengiz Tuncer; Ibrahim Colak; Yunus Aydin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Waste in the U.S. Health care system: a conceptual framework.

Authors:  Tanya G K Bentley; Rachel M Effros; Kartika Palar; Emmett B Keeler
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.911

8.  Patient-based outcomes for the operative treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Samo K Fokter; Scott A Yerby
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Determinants of patient satisfaction after surgery for central spinal stenosis without concomitant spondylolisthesis: a register study of 5100 patients.

Authors:  Freyr Gauti Sigmundsson; Bo Jönsson; Björn Strömqvist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Can decompression surgery relieve low back pain in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis combined with degenerative lumbar scoliosis?

Authors:  Shunji Tsutsui; Ryohei Kagotani; Hiroshi Yamada; Hiroshi Hashizume; Akihito Minamide; Yukihiro Nakagawa; Hiroshi Iwasaki; Munehito Yoshida
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.