Literature DB >> 3704799

Postoperative instability after decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.

K E Johnsson, S Willner, K Johnsson.   

Abstract

Slipping after decompression for myelographically verified spinal stenosis (AP diameter less than or equal to 11 mm) was studied in 45 patients (32 men and 13 women). Mean age at the time of operation was 64 years. Mean time of postoperative observation was 46 months. The results in 29 patients were excellent or good and in 16 unchanged or worse. Degenerative spondylolisthesis was found in 20 patients and acquired spinal stenosis in 25. Postoperative slipping was seen in 18 patients. Seven belonged to the good group. A significant increase of patients with slipping was seen in the poor group (P less than 0.01). An enhanced risk of further slipping was seen in degenerative spondylolisthesis (P less than 0.01), but it did not influence the result of the operation. The radicality of the operation was about equal in both the good and poor groups and in the groups with or without postoperative slipping. A general decrease of the disc heights after operation was seen in all groups but was not significant in the poor group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3704799     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198603000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  53 in total

1.  Interspinous implant with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients.

Authors:  Sung-Joo Ryu; In-Soo Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-05-31

2.  Anterior shear strength of the porcine lumbar spine after laminectomy and partial facetectomy.

Authors:  Guido B van Solinge; Albert J van der Veen; Jaap H van Dieën; Idsart Kingma; Barend J van Royen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Diagnostic approach in instability and irritative state of a "lumbar motion segment" following disc surgery--failed back surgery syndrome.

Authors:  T M Markwalder; H J Reulen
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis-results of expansive laminoplasty.

Authors:  S S Sangwan; Zile Singh Kundu; Pankaj Walecha; R C Siwach; Pradeep Kamboj; Raj Singh
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Midterm outcome after unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: 5-year prospective study.

Authors:  Halit Cavuşoğlu; Ramazan Alper Kaya; Osman Nuri Türkmenoglu; Cengiz Tuncer; Ibrahim Colak; Yunus Aydin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Patient-based outcomes for the operative treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Samo K Fokter; Scott A Yerby
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  [Minimally invasive decompression techniques for spinal cord stenosis].

Authors:  A Korge; C Mehren; S Ruetten
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Early results of stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion in iatrogenic spondylolisthesis patients.

Authors:  M A König; F V Ebrahimi; A Nitulescu; E Behrbalk; B M Boszczyk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Surgical treatment and results in patients suffering from lumbar spinal stenoses.

Authors:  M Lange; C Hamburger; E Waidhauser; O J Beck
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.042

10.  Low risk for vertebral slipping after decompression with facet joint preserving technique for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  B Jönsson; M Akesson; K Jonsson; B Strömqvist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.